Updated cap status report - March 1st - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2006, 01:44 PM   #1
hwc
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,216
Default Updated cap status report - March 1st

ESPN's John Clayton just posted an updated list of the cap status for all NFL teams, based on a $92 million cap, as of 1:50 pm on Wed. March 1st. Although he doesn't say, I believe he gets these numbers from the league

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2349505

He shows the Pats as $1.5 million under the cap.

Other notables:

Pittsburgh: $7 million over
Indy: $9.4 million over
Jets: $11.1 million over
Broncos: $16.4 million over
Dolphins: $21.9 million over

Bills: $2 million under

Last edited by hwc; 03-01-2006 at 01:55 PM..
hwc is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-01-2006, 02:01 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default

The jets have done an amzing job so far. A restructuring of Penny and cutting/trading Abraham will put them under by a reasonable amount. Not bad since they started $30M over.
mgteich is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:04 PM   #3
hwc
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
The jets have done an amzing job so far.
I know what you are saying. However, $11 million over the cap without a healthy starting QB on the roster doesn't sound that great to me! As bad as the Jets are, you'd to be under the cap and looking to improve. With the cupboard already bare, $11 million over the cap sux.
hwc is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:05 PM   #4
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich
The jets have done an amzing job so far. A restructuring of Penny and cutting/trading Abraham will put them under by a reasonable amount. Not bad since they started $30M over.
But I don't think Abraham is likely to be traded by Friday, is he?

Pennington will take a reduction or be cut by Friday however - but with Abraham still under the franchise tag they'll have to find some cap room elsewhere.

Your point is still a good one however.

I'm amazed to see what trouble the Fins are in - and am wondering who they let go.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:10 PM   #5
hwc
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSixPat
I'm amazed to see what trouble the Fins are in - and am wondering who they let go.
The entire starting defense?
hwc is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:47 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,759
Default

They got the cap number down, but did it by releasing a bunch of players. On a terrible team, I wouldnt call getting to 11 mill over by cutting some of your better players a good job. Perhaps it was all they could do, but I'd say restructuring, trading, doing whatever to get down to 11mill WITHOUT reducing talent a lot would be a good job.

I dont remember all of the cuts but I know Fabini, their best OL is gone. Law, there best DB is gone, and Abraham, their best defensive player will be gone and thats still not getting them under the cap.

I'm not sure what the basis of 'good job' is. Getting rid of 20mill worth of talent to save 20mill on the cap when you have little talent to begin with doesnt seem to qualify.
AndyJohnson is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:53 PM   #7
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
dryheat44's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NOVA
Posts: 6,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
They got the cap number down, but did it by releasing a bunch of players. On a terrible team, I wouldnt call getting to 11 mill over by cutting some of your better players a good job. Perhaps it was all they could do, but I'd say restructuring, trading, doing whatever to get down to 11mill WITHOUT reducing talent a lot would be a good job.

I dont remember all of the cuts but I know Fabini, their best OL is gone. Law, there best DB is gone, and Abraham, their best defensive player will be gone and thats still not getting them under the cap.

I'm not sure what the basis of 'good job' is. Getting rid of 20mill worth of talent to save 20mill on the cap when you have little talent to begin with doesnt seem to qualify.
Great point. I find it hard to believe that a collection of bull***** players, like Miami, is 22 million over the cap. That's Bobby Grier style right there. Giving out huge contracts to Max Lane and the like.
__________________
When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
dryheat44 is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:56 PM   #8
hwc
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,216
Default

I haven't studied Miami's situation, but they have a LOT of high-priced veterans on the defensive side of the ball -- high-priced veterans who have done a lot of funny-money restructures overs the years.

Saban was always in a race against time to get a little offensive production before he had to blow up the defense.
hwc is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 03:03 PM   #9
Moderator
 
pats1's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,261
Default

Man, there will be a so-called "Bloody Thursday" if this deal doesn't get done.
pats1 is offline  
Old 03-01-2006, 03:21 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default

I agree that the organization was and is in really bad shape. Previous decisions have killed them. I just think that they have done what they needed to do. When they know the new cap numbers, they will act as needed with Abraham and Pennington.

And no, I don't expect the jets to be competititive until at least 2008. I expect them to draft their QB, who will take a couple of years to develop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson
They got the cap number down, but did it by releasing a bunch of players. On a terrible team, I wouldnt call getting to 11 mill over by cutting some of your better players a good job. Perhaps it was all they could do, but I'd say restructuring, trading, doing whatever to get down to 11mill WITHOUT reducing talent a lot would be a good job.

I dont remember all of the cuts but I know Fabini, their best OL is gone. Law, there best DB is gone, and Abraham, their best defensive player will be gone and thats still not getting them under the cap.

I'm not sure what the basis of 'good job' is. Getting rid of 20mill worth of talent to save 20mill on the cap when you have little talent to begin with doesnt seem to qualify.
mgteich is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC