Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2010, 01:09 PM   #31
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,755
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by BPF View Post
Not as a pass rusher. Here it is from Seymour himself. He's a run player now.:


Read more: High-priced Richard Seymour lost in the Raiders' shuffle - Sports - Modbee.com
He's always been a run player first and foremost. I don't see anything in that quote that suggests what you're saying he said.
BradyFTW! is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-05-2010, 01:11 PM   #32
All Pro Poster
 
JackBauer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 12,911
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhamz View Post
The 2009-2010 Patriots defense misses Seymour. They aren't as good without him as they would have been with him. I don't see how anyone logically would dispute that.

He was going to leave after the 2009-2010 season for no compensation because the Pats were not going to pay him the big $ and big years at his age with his injury history that someone else will. Again, I don't see how anyone logically would dispute that based on what we know about both parties.

Bill B thought the long term benefit of that future first round pick was worth the short term pain the team was absorbing by not having Seymour this year. He was willing to put a lessor team on the field this year in order to try to gain some long term advantages. Time will tell on whether it was a good move or not.
Pretty much spot on. Really nothing more to discuss in this thread.
JackBauer is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:11 PM   #33
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,755
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers View Post
Not as much as you think at OLB. AD plays a full 16 games last year and that projects out to 9 sacks- close to TBC's 9.5. Vrabes had 4. Burgess has 5. Thats a wash.
But AD didn't play a full 16 games last year. That's the point.

Also, to address some other posters re: Seymour's injury history: what injury history? He's had one significant injury in his career, which he sustained while playing FB and has since fully recovered from. Other than that, he's shown himself to be no more injury prone than Warren or Wilfork.
BradyFTW! is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:11 PM   #34
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
BradyManny's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,298
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunescribe View Post
The Patriots finished the season with 31 sacks, one more than last year when Richard Seymour had one of his best seasons. I say BB's decision to ship him out has been vindicated. Looking forward to that extra No. 1 pick, or whomever/whatever it brings.

Richard, by the way, finished the season with a whopping four sacks (including two in his first game as a Raider), tying him for 82nd in the league. Keep in mind that this was in a system designed to maximize his potential as a pass rusher.
All I can do is compare him to his replacement, Jarvis Green. And Jarvis Green is no Richard Seymour, against the run or the pass.

Let's put it this way, I'd feel better about the upcoming postseason with Seymour on this roster right now. I doubt many people would argue with that sentiment. I'm not saying it was a bad trade - but its hard to argue that he doesn't make the team better, stats or no stats.
BradyManny is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:14 PM   #35
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
 
Deus Irae's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,447
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhamz View Post
The 2009-2010 Patriots defense misses Seymour. They aren't as good without him as they would have been with him. I don't see how anyone logically would dispute that.

He was going to leave after the 2009-2010 season for no compensation because the Pats were not going to pay him the big $ and big years at his age with his injury history that someone else will. Again, I don't see how anyone logically would dispute that based on what we know about both parties.

Bill B thought the long term benefit of that future first round pick was worth the short term pain the team was absorbing by not having Seymour this year. He was willing to put a lessor team on the field this year in order to try to gain some long term advantages. Time will tell on whether it was a good move or not.
Unless you know something about compensation for lost free agents in the uncapped year that I don't (I looked for a change in the CBA regarding this, but couldn't find one), Seymour could have yielded a compensatory pick (likely a 3rd), as well as the extra year of service, even if the team had let him walk after this season.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
Deus Irae is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:18 PM   #36
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,377
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
But AD didn't play a full 16 games last year. That's the point.
I hear ya. Not a huge difference. I would agree w/ you that overall, the rush off the edge is better this year, but it's not clear-cut.

Seems the impact of his loss is more felt along the line.

My .02$
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick
robertweathers is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:23 PM   #37
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
BradyFTW!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 13,755
My Mood: Doh
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertweathers View Post
I hear ya. Not a huge difference. I would agree w/ you that overall, the rush off the edge is better this year, but it's not clear-cut.

Seems the impact of his loss is more felt along the line.

My .02$
I agree that it's felt on the line too, which makes sense since Warren, in particular, is seeing more double teams now that Seymour is gone. Wilfork isn't on the field on passing downs anyways. I know that this gets a little subjective at this point, but I will say that Burgess and TBC are *much* better at pressuring the QB than Woods and Vrabel were in 2008. The reason why the 2008 OLB's sack #s are even comparable to the 2009 group's is because there's nobody on the defensive line collapsing the pocket in 2009. If Seymour were with us, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that TBC would be at 12+ sacks this year. He's the best pass-rusher we've had at OLB since Willie McGinest, and they would have been coming off the same side.

That's the problem in comparing OLBs between 2008 and 2009 based on sack numbers alone. There are a number of variables that haven't been controlled for- most relevantly, Seymour.
BradyFTW! is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:31 PM   #38
BPF
In the Starting Line-up
 
BPF's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 2,456
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
He's always been a run player first and foremost. I don't see anything in that quote that suggests what you're saying he said.
I guess what I'm trying to say, so I can be as clear as possible. Seymour hasn't been a dominant player since he was 27. He's been on a steady decline since that point and I can name you only about 5 dominant DL's in the history of the league that played well once over age 30. Now, I'm not saying he couldn't be servicable but not any longer dominant. You don't get 1st Rd picks in return for servicable DL's and he is headed there quickly if not already. Seymour was at his best from 2002-2006, if you recall he missed most of the undefeated season due to injuries -- played 9 games. His best season was 2003. 2008 was an ok season stat wise but he wasn't dominant, everyone could clearly see that. He wasn't relentless and as active knocking down passes in addition to creating pressures. He did have 8 sacks but those numbers were very deceiving, his overall pressures were down. Would I feel better about the playoffs if we had 2003 Seymour, hell yeah!! But 2007 -2009 Seymour wouldn't really make a big difference.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit."
Aristotle

"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance."
Socrates

STH since 1994....sec 236

Last edited by BPF; 01-05-2010 at 01:34 PM..
BPF is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:36 PM   #39
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
robertweathers's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Central MA by way of the great state of New Hampshire
Posts: 7,377
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Quote:
Originally Posted by BradyFTW! View Post
I agree that it's felt on the line too, which makes sense since Warren, in particular, is seeing more double teams now that Seymour is gone. Wilfork isn't on the field on passing downs anyways. I know that this gets a little subjective at this point, but I will say that Burgess and TBC are *much* better at pressuring the QB than Woods and Vrabel were in 2008. The reason why the 2008 OLB's sack #s are even comparable to the 2009 group's is because there's nobody on the defensive line collapsing the pocket in 2009. If Seymour were with us, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that TBC would be at 12+ sacks this year. He's the best pass-rusher we've had at OLB since Willie McGinest, and they would have been coming off the same side.

That's the problem in comparing OLBs between 2008 and 2009 based on sack numbers alone. There are a number of variables that haven't been controlled for- most relevantly, Seymour.
Yep- agreed on collapsing the pocket observations. Thats why you're seeing Wright line up in the interior/over the center on 3rd down.

Gotta wonder what their real position is on Wilfork. 2 down player w/ a very limited pass rush ability.
__________________
“I'm not really concerned about the other 31 teams,” - Bill Belichick

"If a player has talent and doesn't succeed, that means that they either don't want to be successful or I have failed as a coach." - Bill Belichick

Last edited by robertweathers; 01-05-2010 at 01:44 PM..
robertweathers is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 01:40 PM   #40
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,293
Default Re: Anyone still miss Seymour? Final results are in

Final results are in?

The final results will be in when you compare a year of Seymour with whatever we get with the pick we got for Seymour.

I think there will be less discussion then.

Seymour was a great player for us, and he left us a legacy in the form of a first round pick.
__________________
“When we look at the board, based on everything we want in a football player at that particular time, we evaluate them and take the player that fits best for our football team. That’s what we always do, and I think the last nine years we’ve put a pretty competitive team out there on the field every year. I think that’s how you do it – you get good football players. Sometimes they are not always at the No. 1 position, but I don’t think you pass up good football players to get the guys who aren’t as good just because they’re at a position that somebody feels you need.”
BB on his draft philosophy, April 2010

Last edited by spacecrime; 01-05-2010 at 01:42 PM..
spacecrime is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone miss Seymour this weekend?? jeffbiologist PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 15 11-17-2009 11:01 AM
Predict the Score Contest: Final 2006 Results shakadave PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 2 09-22-2007 09:31 PM
Question: Did anyone even miss Seymour & Harrison? Armen Da Pats Fan PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 11 09-10-2007 11:25 AM
PFT: Seymour could miss season pats1 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 120 09-06-2007 02:12 PM
Predict the Score Contest - Final Results (2005) shakadave PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 14 05-09-2006 10:31 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC