Taking a quick peek at 2010 - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums

aeg · 11-05-2009, 08:42 PM

Interesting, stuff, pats1.

Most of my thoughts were already voiced by other posters, but one point is that McGowan only signed a 2 year deal (2009 and 2010).

If they can't get him to re-up, safety would be a concern again for 2011 and Sanders could end up back as a starter or third safety (if surpassed by Chung as we hope). An aging Springs (if still on the roster) would be another option.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pats1

Meriweather and McGowan, assuming he continues to surpass anyone's wildest dreams of his performance, seem to be set as part of the Patriots' safety rotation in the next 3-4 years. If all goes well, Chung will join that group (a la Meriweather in 2007-08) and Sanders will be phased out, even though he is a decent player who will find more playing time elsewhere.

***pats1*** · 11-06-2009, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aeg

Interesting, stuff, pats1.

Most of my thoughts were already voiced by other posters, but one point is that McGowan only signed a 2 year deal (2009 and 2010).

If they can't get him to re-up, safety would be a concern again for 2011 and Sanders could end up back as a starter or third safety (if surpassed by Chung as we hope). An aging Springs (if still on the roster) would be another option.

Assuming he doesn't turn into Ed Reed by then, I think he'll be back.

patsox23 · 11-06-2009, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patspsycho

For once, I wish they'd invest in a top notch RB.. this stingy "get them off the scrap heap and squeeze them" philosophy is exasperating me to no end.

#4 overall last year and #7 overall this year, despite injuries in both seasons, makes me question what you're saying here.

Wretch · 11-06-2009, 07:55 AM

Going into last years draft I thought the Pats would try to augment the right side of the OL, especially RG, address needs at OLB, and depth at ILB.

With the McKenzie pick they did some of that, I was disappointed by his injury.

I don't think my opinion has changed much. Neal is a very good RG but is getting older and has been injury prone lately (fingers crossed for this season). LB depth is still and issue. I love seeing Junior play, but the fact that he is on the team right now indicates to me that the Pats depth at LB is wanting.

I am not a Maroney basher, but the Pats stable of RBs will be thin next year I wouldn't be suprised to see a RB selected early.

TE will likely be a need if Watson doesn't resign and BB has shown a willingness to draft TEs early.

Frankly the Pats have a lot of depth through out the team, and because of this can really go any direction they want in the draft. It's nice to root for a team that that clearly has an established system and plan in place and executes that plan so well.

Though I suffered through the 70s and 80s with the Pats I thanks the lord for not letting me be born in Oakland, Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, NJ, Buffalo, Dallas, Jacksonville or TB. BB and Kraft have made the YEARS of suffering worth it.

***WhiZa*** · 11-06-2009, 08:57 AM

Mankins is a RFA? that's great news. Might explain why he's playing subpar this year knowing he's not getting a big contract next year.

I agree Ghost is a 1st round tender. Most teams would jump at the opportunity to get a pro-bowl kicker for a second round pick.

***mgteich*** · 11-06-2009, 09:56 AM

GUARD

Yes, I would have preferred to use a higher pick on this position in the 2009 draft, since Neal is a UFA and Mankins could be an UFA if there is a cap. But the key is that these are 2010 situations. Belichick chose to use a 4th for a developmental guard along while continuing to develop Connolly and Wendell. Belichick also brought in a veteran who has started for other teams at guard in Simmons.

Ohrnberger may have been a poor choice, but it seems to be a reasonable strategy to develop guards when we have no 2009 need, and to bring in a starting quality veteran backup.

Even if we were to lose both our starters, I would expect us to fine at this position. I would expect us to draft a guard or two in the first two rounds. In recent drafts, starting lineman have been available. Even this year, we could have Simmons and Connolly starting if there were injuries.

My BOTTOM LINE is that we have better depth and better preparation for the future on the OL than in any year that I can remember.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wretch

Going into last years draft I thought the Pats would try to augment the right side of the OL, especially RG, address needs at OLB, and depth at ILB.

With the McKenzie pick they did some of that, I was disappointed by his injury.

I don't think my opinion has changed much. Neal is a very good RG but is getting older and has been injury prone lately (fingers crossed for this season). LB depth is still and issue. I love seeing Junior play, but the fact that he is on the team right now indicates to me that the Pats depth at LB is wanting.

I am not a Maroney basher, but the Pats stable of RBs will be thin next year I wouldn't be suprised to see a RB selected early.

TE will likely be a need if Watson doesn't resign and BB has shown a willingness to draft TEs early.

Frankly the Pats have a lot of depth through out the team, and because of this can really go any direction they want in the draft. It's nice to root for a team that that clearly has an established system and plan in place and executes that plan so well.

Though I suffered through the 70s and 80s with the Pats I thanks the lord for not letting me be born in Oakland, Cleveland, Detroit, Washington, NJ, Buffalo, Dallas, Jacksonville or TB. BB and Kraft have made the YEARS of suffering worth it.

***unoriginal*** · 11-06-2009, 12:08 PM

So... with the release of Simmons that leaves Connolly, Ohrnberger, Wendell and Bussey as the guards behind Mankins and Neal.

Prufrock · 11-06-2009, 03:07 PM

I think Watson is gone at the end of the season. I don't think the Patriots are going to be willing to spend what it's going to take to keep him here. This is of course ignoring whatever crazy salary cap rules there are next year. (Even then I don't think they are going to pay up)

I also wonder if they could switch light to the right side and keep Vollmer at LT. The entire o-line has been relatively good, but I would like to see them try to improve it with some 1st or 2nd round picks. An elite offensive line could be an incredible asset to this team, especially with Brady getting older and even less mobile. My hope is that a franchise left tackle becomes available with the Raiders 2011 pick.

***pats1*** · 11-06-2009, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prufrock

I think Watson is gone at the end of the season. I don't think the Patriots are going to be willing to spend what it's going to take to keep him here. This is of course ignoring whatever crazy salary cap rules there are next year. (Even then I don't think they are going to pay up)

I also wonder if they could switch light to the right side and keep Vollmer at LT. The entire o-line has been relatively good, but I would like to see them try to improve it with some 1st or 2nd round picks. An elite offensive line could be an incredible asset to this team, especially with Brady getting older and even less mobile. My hope is that a franchise left tackle becomes available with the Raiders 2011 pick.

Kaczur just got extended; he didn't get extended and paid to be a 3rd OT.

***mgteich*** · 11-06-2009, 04:56 PM

Are you thinking that LeVoir just been extended and paid to be a 3rd OT?

Quote:

Originally Posted by pats1

Kaczur just got extended; he didn't get extended and paid to be a 3rd OT.