ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
This year's offense is great. Clearly we could use another top wide receiver. However the issue for 2006 is that many players are unsigned. Others have one more year left on their contracts: Koppen, Branch and Graham.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's look at the roster with these nine free agents re-signed
Ashworth,Neal,Brown,Davis,Givens,Dwight,Flutie, Evans and Fauria
We then have an improvement over 2005 (Koppen and Light)
-----------------------------------------------------------
QB Brady,xFlutie,Cassell
RB Dillon,Faulk,Pass
FB xEvans
TE Graham,Watson,xFauria
WR Branch,xGivens,xBrown,xDwight,xDavis,Johnson
OL Light,Mankins,Koppen,Hochstein,Kaczur
xNeal,xAshworth,Gorin,Mruczkowksi/Yates
We also have three practice squad whom could compete for spots
WR Sam
WR Childress
OT Britt
================================================
I'm fine with signing everyone. We'd have an imporved team as the young line develops, and brings back Koppen and Light.
==================================================
Obviously, there are many places where we could improve instead of signing our own free agents. The most obvious is at WR and QB.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
This year's offense is great. Clearly we could use another top wide receiver. However the issue for 2006 is that many players are unsigned. Others have one more year left on their contracts: Koppen, Branch and Graham.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's look at the roster with these nine free agents re-signed
Ashworth,Neal,Brown,Davis,Givens,Dwight,Flutie, Evans and Fauria
We then have an improvement over 2005 (Koppen and Light)
-----------------------------------------------------------
QB Brady,xFlutie,Cassell
RB Dillon,Faulk,Pass
FB xEvans
TE Graham,Watson,xFauria
WR Branch,xGivens,xBrown,xDwight,xDavis,Johnson
OL Light,Mankins,Koppen,Hochstein,Kaczur
xNeal,xAshworth,Gorin,Mruczkowksi/Yates
We also have three practice squad whom could compete for spots
WR Sam
WR Childress
OT Britt
================================================
I'm fine with signing everyone. We'd have an imporved team as the young line develops, and brings back Koppen and Light.
==================================================
Obviously, there are many places where we could improve instead of signing our own free agents. The most obvious is at WR and QB.
I'd like to bring in a young vet RB to possibly take over for Corey in 2007, or sooner pending his health. Jonathan Wells and LaBrandon Toefield (RFA) would be my two top choices -- talented guys that just haven't gotten a real opportunity at being a starting RB.
__________________ When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee
I agree with your point with regard to RB. I would suspect that the entire draft should be focused on the offense, except for perhaps a DL. There will be plenty of room to draft a running back or two, as well as wide receivers.
I agree with your point with regard to RB. I would suspect that the entire draft should be focused on the offense, except for perhaps a DL. There will be plenty of room to draft a running back or two, as well as wide receivers.
IMO,most of the draft should be focused to defense. CB, SS, ILB. We should take a RB in the 2nd or 3rd round depending on who is there at the time .
I agree with your point with regard to RB. I would suspect that the entire draft should be focused on the offense, except for perhaps a DL. There will be plenty of room to draft a running back or two, as well as wide receivers.
Gee, Why do you want to go to the well to get water when its dry? If you mean signing FAs as opposed to drafting them for Offense, I could agree but this year's skill position offensive players are offensive, they S-T-I-N-K!
The age on this team is on Defense. At LB and this is the LB draft of the decade. BB/SP have complained that LBs coming out haven't measured up to their standards the past few seasons. Why not get them NOW!?
Not worried about the O-line. Dante's proven he can mold (motivated) lumps of clay into quality players there.
Givens we need, or a solid #2 WR in FA. Love to get Brown back for sentimental reasons, plus, hell, he's still the man on 3rd down. Other than that... they're optional IMHO.
The age on this team is on Defense. At LB and this is the LB draft of the decade. BB/SP have complained that LBs coming out haven't measured up to their standards the past few seasons. Why not get them NOW!?
Because the FA window isn't open yet and the draft isn't until April?