Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2009, 10:53 PM   #1
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
Patspsycho's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 20 minutes from Foxboro
Posts: 1,831
Default Broncos vs. Patriots postgame critical analysis

After sleeping on this for a night and reading on a variety of opinions and point of views here, I would like to share my critical assessment of what happened in the game.

I have to point out that I don't have the luxury of having DVR to re-watch the game, nor do I have access to bird's view footages (I can sense BOR grumbling about this also).

And as far as assigning blame goes, it goes across the board, from execution, to playing to coaching. I am only going to key on a few critical aspects.

DEFENSE
I think that first and foremost, the critical error that we made, and that was more of a decisive factor than anything else, was playing too much prevent defense.

Now I understand those who argue that holding a team to 17 points in regulation isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, all good defenses have the goal of always trying to shut down the opponents, no matter what.

And in this case, playing prevent against Orton is playing right into his hands because as an ordinary methodical quarterback, Orton is going to be quite content with the short and intermediate gains, and never lose patience doing that. Hence the 98 yard drive, and his first 300 yard game in quite a while. I noticed that McD had him throw a lot of comebacks and curls on the outside, taking advantage of the big cushion we give on CBs as part of the prevent philosophy. As proof of this, I point to Bodden having 11 tackles, which is never a good thing. You want LB's to have a high number of tackles, but never your CB's.

Also I am starting to notice that our defense is not suited to playing prevent well. They are young and hungry and prideful; not old, patient and methodical. To have this defense play in prevent is akin to buying a porsche and restricting it to city driving. It is my hope that we stop doing that soon- we showed last week that there is no longer the need to "build" or "evolve" with the base D. This D gets its motivation and energy from making a big stop, be it a sack, interception, fumble, or incomplete.

However this is not to say that our D themselves escape scrutiny or being singled out- a big number of tackles were missed, and contrary to what most pundits here say, we did make halftime adjustments, trying to bring a lot more pressure in the 2nd half with sub packages, particularly in the dime, however credit must be given to the Denver OL which is much stronger than I initially thought- they did well in handling 4 rush pressure. So I don't think it is as much the lack of pressure we brought on 4 men as it was the Denver OL doing a great job.

Other notes:

MCDANIELS
One cannot underestimate his influence on the game which, surprisingly enough includes the defense. One needs to remember that he actually started off with defense when he first started with the Patriots. I noticed in particular one run play where Dawkins sat and seemed to me to be waiting for a gap to develop when the Pats OL pulled on a sweep, and he shot it perfectly and killed the play, and that to me, meant he had to have been coached by McDaniels on tendencies. I am sure if I had the DVR, I would have been able to identify more plays.

BRADY AND EXECUTION
As far as indicting the offense, I think it needs to start with Brady. With only five 2nd half completion and being 0-6 on third downs, the onus is definitely on the Quarterbacks as those numbers point to QB execution more than anything else. There were overthrows, miscommunication and a lack of execution, including the Moss overthrow, but I think what stands out is the Welker incompletion. I believe Welker was going to do a short comeback to get the down, but read on the run and adjusted because there were no safety over the top, so he kept going and would have had the TD if Brady saw the same thing, but he stuck to the play called, instead of adjusting. Who's right and who's wrong? We can discuss this to death, but I think the significance is how Brady and his receivers are still having trouble being in sync. Execution was the glaring weakness on offense.

I think that again I have to point out that Brady is coming off a major surgery. We cannot keep overlooking this fact. We cannot try to look past it. As I've said in the past, there are a number of QB's who have never recovered from having knee surgery.

I believe it was generally agreed in the preseason by most pundits that we would have a slow start to the season, and that is exactly the case right now. Yet there are quite a few people who are panicking and being depressed. And I think that is unnecessary. We do not "need a lot of work" and we do not need to make some drastic change or fire someone. All we need is patience and the foresight that this is a 16 game season.

People are lauding Denver, the Jets, Saints and Vikings as the second coming, but I would rather be where we are, struggling to come together, rather than peaking too early, which may well be the case with those teams whose records put them in the spotlight and set the stage for more and more attention being focused on finding what their weakness is. Even as I write right now, the Dolphins have pretty much taken away the vaunted blitzing defense of the Jets by utilizing a heavy combination of wildcat and runs, and by my count there only has been a few blitzes and one jailbreak.

This is my long-winded assessment, and I invite you to disagree with it or comment on it, but please back your statements with facts or stats. I do not consider myself by any means an expert on football.. and in that regard look forward to constructive comments.

EDIT: I will add more notes and more reviews later on if there is more interest, but if this drops right off the board I will probably take it as a sign to zip it.
__________________
‘Mr. Kraft? I’m Tom Brady. We haven’t met yet, but I’m the best decision this franchise has ever made.’

Last edited by Patspsycho; 10-12-2009 at 11:00 PM.
Patspsycho is online now   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a free Patriots T-Shirt and save 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 188

Updated 10/31/09

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2009 week 5 at broncos, post-game analysis

Sponsored Links


PATRIOTS MERCHANDISE

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426