Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2009, 07:02 PM   #1
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 629
Default Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

I don't get it, Orton isn't known for being a 'big play' QB... he's not going to sling it down the field.

We gave up so much underneath, it was ridiculous. We should have been playing tight the whole game.
Phokus is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-11-2009, 07:06 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
vuudu's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,318
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

This was the real issue in the game. People are going to blame Brady, others will blame the OC, but the game was lost with this strategy. Clearly the Pats outcoached themselves.
vuudu is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:07 PM   #3
Banned
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 356
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

It's the old "bend but don't break"

You would think after the first half where the Broncos moved the ball easily they'd adjust, but no, they let Orton wind up with 350 yards.
LeonPowe is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:08 PM   #4
In the Starting Line-up
 
TriplecHamp's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Dirty
Posts: 4,920
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

I was aksing myself the same question. We were playing scard except for that drive at the end of the fourth. Youd think they would continue to play tight man but no. It really angers me because if Kyle Orton did that to us what will the good qb's do in the playoffs?
TriplecHamp is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:10 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
vuudu's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,318
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by TriplecHamp View Post
I was aksing myself the same question. We were playing scard except for that drive at the end of the fourth. Youd think they would continue to play tight man but no. It really angers me because if Kyle Orton did that to us what will the good qb's do in the playoffs?
Playoffs? Don't talk about playoffs. Are you kidding me? Playoffs? we are just hoping we can win a game, another game.

Last edited by vuudu; 10-11-2009 at 07:11 PM..
vuudu is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:11 PM   #6
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,114
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

The secondary gave up a total of 17 points, and played off a lot in the second half with a 10 point and then a seven point lead.

The offense had the job of scoring ONE POINT in the second half and failed. Brady had Welker open for a touchdown at 4 minutes and missed. Did the defense fold? No! Brady had the ball again with more than 2 minutes left, needing to score a field goal.

And you guys want to blame the defense and defensive coaching!!!! They needed to understand that the offense was incapable of scoring even one point in the second half.
mgteich is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:14 PM   #7
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 34
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

Defense drove me bat***** crazy tonight. Especially since they proved they can be aggressive and dominant against the Ravens.
PatsFan00042 is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:14 PM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 
thewaylifeshouldbe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 514
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by TriplecHamp View Post
I was aksing myself the same question. We were playing scard except for that drive at the end of the fourth. Youd think they would continue to play tight man but no. It really angers me because if Kyle Orton did that to us what will the good qb's do in the playoffs?
Playoffs???
__________________
Never enough rings......
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
thewaylifeshouldbe is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:15 PM   #9
U.S. Air Force Retired
 
Boston Boxer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 2,274
My Mood: Buzzed
Send a message via Yahoo to Boston Boxer
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

the two big issues that led to the loss in my opinion:

A) Brady is an average QB so far this year. He cant hit the open WRs and is just not throwing the ball well at all. The semi long pass to a wide open Randy Moss in the end zone was inexcusable. His knee is fine, so we can quit using that excuse. tom Brady is the best QB we have ever had and one of the top QBs in the NFL, EVER...but he is not above being called out when he clearly is having a terrible season.

B) The CBs suck...plain and simple. They play way too far off the ball and got shredded by Kyle frickin Orton. Give me a break.

Moroney was a none factor in this game. He missed a block that almost got Brady killed, and then i dont think he played more than a couple of downs after that. Its a shame because this was the game he could have showed what he is made of as a RB. another flop.

Last edited by Boston Boxer; 10-11-2009 at 07:15 PM..
Boston Boxer is offline  
Old 10-11-2009, 07:17 PM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 
condon84's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,682
Default Re: Why the hell did the secondary play so far off the receivers

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgteich View Post
The secondary gave up a total of 17 points, and played off a lot in the second half with a 10 point and then a seven point lead.

The offense had the job of scoring ONE POINT in the second half and failed. Brady had Welker open for a touchdown at 4 minutes and missed. Did the defense fold? No! Brady had the ball again with more than 2 minutes left, needing to score a field goal.

And you guys want to blame the defense and defensive coaching!!!! They needed to understand that the offense was incapable of scoring even one point in the second half.
While I agree that Brady sucked today, the criticism of our defensive strategy is not without merit.

The fact that we played soft and allowed Orton to be in rythm all game long and did not put pressure on him is dumbfounding. We only put pressure on him in that last drive and we came out with good results.

Our defense played extremely passive today. None of the aggressiveness it showed last week.
condon84 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Secondary Issues: Is it the players or the play-calling? tombonneau PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 11 11-25-2008 07:19 AM
Which of the Chargers receivers is a bigger threat to the Pats secondary PATRIOT64 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 20 01-19-2008 09:17 PM
Receivers who are ready to play mgteich PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 7 08-27-2007 03:06 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563