Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged] - Page 7 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2009, 10:25 AM   #61
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,535
Default Re: Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Seb - one of the things that we, as fans, don't know is how Woodley did in his interviews and in the film room with BB. If the Pats didn't feel he could handle the 2 gap scheme or if he didn't impress BB with his intelligence, or if he showed an attitude that BB felt would be detrimental to the team, then he wasn't brought in. This is something we'll never know.

I am sure we'd all love to have our binkies on the team, but it doesn't happen.. And those binkies go to other teams and have great careers and we are left wondering what might have been.. The issue is that we're not the coach. We're not the ones who would have to work with that player every day for 3-6 years (minus a month or two here and there). And That is all part of the process. It doesn't do any good to sit and complain or pretend like you know better like some other posters do. Because no one knows what would have happened had that player been taken by the Pats. He could have flopped. And then we'd be complaining about how the player flopped (ala Jackson).

All we can do now is hope that BB has brought in someone to help them find the linebackers that they need to help rebuild this defense to its prominence.. Its started with Mayo, Guyton, Crable, and McKenzie. It needs to continue.. Oh, and the fact that Crable and McKenzie have both gotten injured has no bearing since you can't predict injuries..
I don't know if you quoted me right after I posted that response, but I added an additional comment:

Quote:
However, there's no sense in crying over missed opportunities. I only brought Woodley up because I thought it was kind of interesting that NE now owns the rights to a number of young Wolverine LB's, and the two they passed up (Woodley and Harris) have been the most successful of the group.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
sebman2112 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-23-2009, 10:40 AM   #62
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,319
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Seb - one of the things that we, as fans, don't know is how Woodley did in his interviews and in the film room with BB. If the Pats didn't feel he could handle the 2 gap scheme or if he didn't impress BB with his intelligence, or if he showed an attitude that BB felt would be detrimental to the team, then he wasn't brought in. This is something we'll never know.

I am sure we'd all love to have our binkies on the team, but it doesn't happen.. And those binkies go to other teams and have great careers and we are left wondering what might have been.. The issue is that we're not the coach. We're not the ones who would have to work with that player every day for 3-6 years (minus a month or two here and there). And That is all part of the process. It doesn't do any good to sit and complain or pretend like you know better like some other posters do. Because no one knows what would have happened had that player been taken by the Pats. He could have flopped. And then we'd be complaining about how the player flopped (ala Jackson).

All we can do now is hope that BB has brought in someone to help them find the linebackers that they need to help rebuild this defense to its prominence.. Its started with Mayo, Guyton, Crable, and McKenzie. It needs to continue.. Oh, and the fact that Crable and McKenzie have both gotten injured has no bearing since you can't predict injuries..
i agree with you that woodley is not a pat and all the LB that we did not draft are not pats we got who we got

but as far as interviews and the film room i think some times coachs put to much in to that

BB said he was amazed by chad jackson in he's interview and the way he broke down the O in the film room

how did he work out for the pats

football is not that hard its run pass kick catch tackel

if you can play then you can play if you cant then you cant

i think woodley would have played good for the pats and any team in the NFL


would he put up the same numbers with the pats as he dose with the stellers no the pats dont run that kind of a D

AD was a 11 sack all pro OLB for the ravens with the pats he gets 5 sacks a year

the pats will never have that marcus ware 20 sack type player they play a band but dont brake D they dont stop the O they let the O stop them selfs

but like you said we dont have woodley we never did every one needs to get over it

Last edited by patsfan-1982; 09-23-2009 at 10:41 AM..
patsfan-1982 is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:46 AM   #63
Pats, B's, Sox
 
DaBruinz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sacshe, TX (by way of Salem,NH)
Posts: 22,617
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged]

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan-1982 View Post
i agree with you that woodley is not a pat and all the LB that we did not draft are not pats we got who we got

but as far as interviews and the film room i think some times coachs put to much in to that

BB said he was amazed by chad jackson in he's interview and the way he broke down the O in the film room

how did he work out for the pats
Jackson never was able to earn Brady's trust. For whatever reason. Its why he was cut after the final 53.

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan-1982 View Post
football is not that hard its run pass kick catch tackel

if you can play then you can play if you cant then you cant

i think woodley would have played good for the pats and any team in the NFL
Football is a lot more than just run, pass, kick, catch, tackle. Otherwise teams like the Pats wouldn't have playbooks that are 6 inches thick.


Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan-1982 View Post
would he put up the same numbers with the pats as he dose with the stellers no the pats dont run that kind of a D

AD was a 11 sack all pro OLB for the ravens with the pats he gets 5 sacks a year

the pats will never have that marcus ware 20 sack type player they play a band but dont brake D they dont stop the O they let the O stop them selfs

but like you said we dont have woodley we never did every one needs to get over it
The Pats defense in the 3-4 is predicated on being able to get pressure from any of the 4 LBer positions. They might have been able to do that this year if they had the personnel. They felt they didn't, so they went to the 4-3 as a base, which is very similar to 2001. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Pats bring in more LBers in the draft and in free agency...

And I wasn't slamming Seb. When it comes to things like the draft and adding players, he's got his head on straight. He's not like other people who sit and whine about players not being on this team.
DaBruinz is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:55 AM   #64
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,319
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged]

dabruinz i just seen you have over 13000 post wow how long have you been on this site

i fond this site like all most 2 years ago i only have 400 post will i did not post for a long time

but still 13000 thats cool
patsfan-1982 is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:59 AM   #65
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBruinz View Post
Its started with Mayo, Guyton, Crable, and McKenzie. It needs to continue.. Oh, and the fact that Crable and McKenzie have both gotten injured has no bearing since you can't predict injuries..
McKenzie's injury is obviously very legit and very unfortunate. But Crable's been on the IR twice - once with a "shin" and this year with a hammy. There's no way a hamstring injury is season-ending for a player who is able to contribute. History has not been kind to guys who are "stashed" on the IR for a full year, never mind 2 years. I'd say Crable is 95% towards being a bust.
bucky is offline  
Old 09-23-2009, 04:02 PM   #66
Practice Squad
 
NG Pats Fan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Reiss: Pats acquire LB Prescott Burgess from Ravens for cond. 7th [merged]

Maybe he is the next Adam Seward?
NG Pats Fan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pats acquire DE/OLB Derrick Burgess for draft picks GostkowSKI PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 426 08-10-2009 03:06 PM
Prescott Burgess: good coverage LB PonyExpress Patriots Draft Talk 11 02-05-2007 01:13 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563