- Joined
- Jan 16, 2005
- Messages
- 14,050
- Reaction score
- 11,422
They lost a bet .................there are people who actually own jaguars and buccaneers season tickets?
.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.They lost a bet .................there are people who actually own jaguars and buccaneers season tickets?
.
In those cases the teams want to double dip. They want the ticket sale for the unused ticket, as well as the sale of tickets to new/last moment fans.I know of 2 teams, the Jaguars and the Buccaneers, who have done the same already. I would bet there are others.
It's either that or make the weekly Sunday trip to Rite Aide to buy stool softenerthere are people who actually own jaguars and buccaneers season tickets?
.
I still wonder if any sort of conditions were placed on season ticket holders that they had to attend games. On the one hand, it doesn't seem right that scalpers be allowed to gouge actual fans even worse than these NFL teams. On the other hand, the right to season tickets on its own might be a valuable asset to the holders, which they are entitled to utilize at their own discretion.
Think of the kid who got season tickets passed down in a will, instead of say, the cabin. Property rights might be engaged here, could be an interesting legal battle.
I would be beyond shocked if there failed to be language in any season ticket agreements and on season tickets that operates to make sure there is no property interest in season tickets that can be enforced against the team outside of the current season.Think of the kid who got season tickets passed down in a will, instead of say, the cabin. Property rights might be engaged here, could be an interesting legal battle.
I am not sure what people want though. If you sell your ticket you could lose yours? Does that mean you just give it to a friend or don't go. There are a huge # of people who might want to see a game, some from a long ways away, and a very limited supply of single game tickets that are hard to get. So the resale provides opportunity for these fans to go. When I came last year, my brother and I spent $1000+ for 2 tickets, stayed 3 nights in Boston and spent a good bit eating, drinking etc. I wanted to see Brady play one time (it was the Bengals game). I did not feel ripped off (except the hotel price). If there is no way to get tickets to a single game, that is a big FU to your fans.
Ticket exchange.. there would still be a way to get tickets and you would get them at fair market value, not over-inflated prices
Although those overinflated prices are never going to go completely away because they sell thousands of tickets to resellers, radio stations, etc as promotional prizes
Ticket exchange.. there would still be a way to get tickets and you would get them at fair market value, not over-inflated prices
Although those overinflated prices are never going to go completely away because they sell thousands of tickets to resellers, radio stations, etc as promotional prizes
When you can get a 12 games of football for under $500, why wouldn't you..
But, if the season-ticket holder is in fact selling tickets to people who want to attend the games in person, is that not what is happening?Screw ST holders who use their seats as a financial asset. Let folks who want to attend in person go to games.
Most tickets on the back say that the ticket is only a "license" to attend. (And I know that you know ) ....that a license is the lowest rung on the property rights ladder, which generally speaking can be revoked at any time.I would be beyond shocked if there failed to be language in any season ticket agreements and on season tickets that operates to make sure there is no property interest in season tickets that can be enforced against the team outside of the current season.
I don't understand why teams are even that lenient. NE (and I'm sure the other ones as well) has verbiage about how tix aren't allowed to be resold except through team-approved channels (like ticketExchange here in NE). So why don't they actually enforce that? They could very easily void tickets sold on Ace/Stubhub/etc. so buyers couldn't get in with them. That'd kill off the online scalping market real fast.For teams with decade-long waiting lists, I think some kind of requirement like this is essential. Otherwise season ticket turnover could fall to zero. If you can turn a tidy profit on seats you no longer want, why ever give them up?
I don't understand why teams are even that lenient. NE (and I'm sure the other ones as well) has verbiage about how tix aren't allowed to be resold except through team-approved channels (like ticketExchange here in NE). So why don't they actually enforce that? They could very easily void tickets sold on Ace/Stubhub/etc. so buyers couldn't get in with them. That'd kill off the online scalping market real fast.
(Which reminds me -- I don't want to see a single penny of taxpayer dollars being spent to enforce anti-scalping laws. There shouldn't even be any anti-scalping laws. If a team/artist/venue/etc. doesn't want its tickets scalped, then let them do the enforcement themselves (such as I just mentioned) and let them sue scalpers for violating the terms of the ticket license if they care as much as they claim to.)