Christopher_Price
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Messages
- 1,407
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Mike the Brit said:My current understanding of BB/Pioli's policy on the Injury Report is that they are avoiding whines from Polian/****ing a snook at the league by applying the letter of the law.
First, they are listing everyone on the injury report who has missed even a portion of practice (that means Brady).
Second, they are only listing players as "probable" if they are almost sure to play (Brady again).
So, by listing players as "questionable" they are avoiding the potential objections if someone doesn't play.
That said, this list does NOT look good. What's the over-under on the number who don't play? I'll guess eight.
Mike the Brit said:My current understanding of BB/Pioli's policy on the Injury Report is that they are avoiding whines from Polian/****ing a snook at the league by applying the letter of the law.
First, they are listing everyone on the injury report who has missed even a portion of practice (that means Brady).
Second, they are only listing players as "probable" if they are almost sure to play (Brady again).
So, by listing players as "questionable" they are avoiding the potential objections if someone doesn't play.
That said, this list does NOT look good. What's the over-under on the number who don't play? I'll guess eight.
Brownfan80 said:Brady is always on the list and always probable.
Mike the Brit said:That said, this list does NOT look good. What's the over-under on the number who don't play? I'll guess eight.
JR4 said:Now this is starting to look more like the Patriots we all know and love ...