PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Using the "dead snap" to eliminate bad snaps


Status
Not open for further replies.

PP2

Hall of Fame Poster
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
24,079
Reaction score
24,544
Interesting read, and you can bet BB is all over it:

How one technique could end bad snaps forever

For those who want to avoid clicking on ESPN:

Jim Harbaugh needed to test the "dead snap." If he was going to challenge football's ultimate fundamental action, he would have to try it out for himself. So he lined up at quarterback in the shotgun, ready to handle the remodeled quarterback-center exchange advertised as the way to wipe out one of football's most infuriating and unforgivable blunders -- the bad snap.

"Coach Harbaugh thought it was great," Michigan offensive line coach Tim Drevno said. "Bad snaps can take points off the board and wins out of your hand."

Since then, Harbaugh-coached teams have ditched the spiral shotgun snap in favor of the dead snap.

Revolution could be underway.

More teams than ever before will break spiral-snap tradition and rely on the dead snap in 2017, as assistant coaches nurtured in the spread era flood sidelines and under-center playbooks become historical references. In 2016, 84 percent of snaps were run from the pistol or shotgun formation, a 33 percent increase since just 2011.

"This is something you're going to see more of," Rutgers offensive line coach AJ Blazek said.

Blazek was persuaded to experiment with football's primordial function by Northwestern assistant Adam Cushing, who was at a crossroads with his centers after the 2015 season. They couldn't snap the ball on target. His offensive coordinator, with each errant Saturday snap, would remind him of that. Seven snaps that season were classified as a disaster.

As Cushing canvassed the snapping landscape in his offseason probe, he noticed Michigan and a few other schools' centers peculiarly palming the football's nose rather than grabbing the laces in shotgun. They flipped and floated it back, allowing it to hang in the air without much rotation. It was a landmark judgment favoring precision over power.

That crude simplicity is the dead snap's most attractive feature. Once the ball is spotted, the center places the back point of the ball in his palm rather than gripping it like a quarterback arming a spiral. The nose is then placed into the ground so the ball is at a 45-degree angle with an inch of the ball grazing the turf. The fingers are spread, usually with one across the laces or seam to help with grip. Then with the wrist locked, the center swings his arm back like a pendulum and releases.

"Life changing," Cushing said.

It was the same for former Vanderbilt center Joe Townsend.

Small hands, sweaty palms -- that's how he characterizes his mitts, which were at the core of his issues with the Commodores. His hands weren't big enough to fully grip the football, and when the SEC swelter forced perspiration to slide down his arm, greasing the ball, he struggled to secure it.

Commodores guard Wesley Johnson suggested at a 2012 practice that he try a primitive sandlot method popular across backyards and barbecues. "Bear claw it," Johnson said. Stick the nose into your palm and shuffle it back, he said. "Trust me, just try it."

In the pre-practice walk-through, Townsend gave it an attempt. He didn't tell then-position coach Herb Hand, but quickly Townsend was snapping perfect chest-high changeups the quarterbacks could easily gather. "Coach Hand said, 'Joe, what the hell are you doing?' I said, 'I'm trying something out,' and he said, 'Well, come to me before changing s--- up!'" Townsend remembered. "But it worked, and I did it throughout my career."

If the dead snap sounds complicated, centers assure it's much easier than the spiral and avoids a hurtling fastball back to the quarterback. Northwestern center Brad North said his biggest flaw is overthinking, so after a 2015 season of bumbled snaps, he learned the straightforward dead snap in a few weeks. Last season, Northwestern did not have one snap that prematurely ended a play.

Elite programs can often recruit centers with a background in spiral snapping, and coaches usually won't fiddle with a lineman who is comfortable with his delivery. But a lot of schools have to fit a lineman in at center and then guide him. North was a high school tackle who had never snapped.

"And you can't be the starter if you can't snap," he said.
 
How much slower is this type of snap? It would seem given how fast a pass rush gets to you that even a split second would make a difference. Might not be a huge deal in college but could be in the pros.
 
How much slower is this type of snap? It would seem given how fast a pass rush gets to you that even a split second would make a difference. Might not be a huge deal in college but could be in the pros.

Later on in the article, it talks about Jeff Saturday using this while with the Colts. Didn't seem to cause any problems there.
 
So after 2,559,819 snaps in pro football history, the most repeated act in the game, they discover a new and better method?
 
Proposed rule to competition committee:

Only the team that popularized the dead snap can use it...and other teams on the competition committee.
 
How much slower is this type of snap? It would seem given how fast a pass rush gets to you that even a split second would make a difference. Might not be a huge deal in college but could be in the pros.

IDK. If the QB is back fairly deep in Shotgun, it seems like a spiral might be necessary to get the distance. Even so, I can't imagine that the slower speed would make more than 0.1-0.2 seconds difference. And, if the ball is easier to handle for the QB, that minimal time difference may not be a difference at all.

And for the shorter setback in the pistol, the slower speed would probably be better for the QB than a rifled ball.
 
Video explanation of the dead snap (around 3:30 or so)

 
Getting the ball back slower might not slow the play. The receivers getting into their routes is what determines the timing, and that will not change. The QB will get rid of the ball slightly sooner after receiving it.
 
This actually looks to me like a winning style of shifting the ball for when the QB isn't under center. A slightly slower delivery might well be a good thing if it gives him more time to ge a better grip on the ball as well as spending some time looking off his receivers.
 
This is like side snapping when we played pick up in grammar school and no one could really snap, but between the legs.

So after 2,559,819 snaps in pro football history, the most repeated act in the game, they discover a new and better method?

All innovations are improvements over what worked and was not questioned because it worked. Seriously, the hand crank worked OK too but electrically turning the crank shaft is better. Heck, the can opener was better than hammer and chisel though that was good enough for years. (Yes, the can was invented long before the can opener and hammer and chisel were used to open cans. Yes, cans were not popular for that reason. :) )
 
So after 2,559,819 snaps in pro football history, the most repeated act in the game, they discover a new and better method?

How is this a "new" method when the guy with the most pass yards in NFL history (Peyton Manning) received dead-snapped balls almost his entire career?
 
I thought dead snap referred to an emergency medical situation when a man pushes Viagara's boundaries too far.
 
Last edited:
This is similar to what I used to do when I was a kid because I sucked at doing it the regular way. Of course, I didn't have the attention to detail about fingers on the seams...and I still sucked at it, but for me it was easier than the traditional way.

I thought dead snap referred to an emergency medical situation when a man pushes the boundaries too far with Viagara.

2eb5491a1c310f792843c9162cc0c093.gif
 
It isn't much of a big deal as it will not effect most plays but one play it will effect is the pass to a WR just sitting at the start of his route who gets the ball thrown to him as to run for a short gain (it will make him have to wait .1 seconds longer to get the ball).

This is a play the Pats like to run a lot of the time. Personally I don't see them going to dead-snap as it will effect that play which is a staple of their offense (unless they switch between spiral and dead-snap which would not be smart either).

That .1 second could get your WRs who try to instantly block in front more likely to get a penalty cause the blocks get there too soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Patriots QB Drake Maye Conference Call
Patriots Now Have to Get to Work After Taking Maye
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf and Jerod Mayo After Patriots Take Drake Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Back
Top