A fascinating, in sort of an aggrieved tone, summary of the evidence.
In the end, there is very little factual evidence for or against tampering.
There is a ton of circumstantial evidence requiring interpretation.
I think, if you hate the Patriots, you will discount this and accept the league's interpretation.
If you like the Patriots, you will discount the league's interpretation and accept the Patriots.
If this gets to a court, I would assume it will be hard to side with the league's interpretation of 'more probable than not.' If this goes no further than Goodell, I would assume it will be hard to convince him to consider anything other than the Wells interpretation.
I do now know the generally-considered-average time it takes a largish man to relieve himself, wash his hands, and return to work. On this, the decision turns.