With all due respect, this is utter crap in my opinion.
Manning wins another ring, and he'll be sitting with 14 playoff wins, 4 AFC Championships, and 2 SB rings. Brady is currently sitting at 18 playoff wins, 5 AFC championships, and 3 SB rings. Who has the edge here?
And as far as SB performances go, I'll take Brady's cumulative body of work there over Peyton's every time. Tom never embarrassed himself like Manning did in 48.
You can look at stats all you want, but results in the playoffs are what matter. A poster on here basically put it this way in regards to the whole Manning vs. Brady debate. "Peyton is one ring away from being in the discussion, Brady is one ring away from ending it entirely" (20+ playoff wins and 4 SBs in the cap era? I'd agree with that argument entirely). The idea that Manning will have "solidified" his place as the GOAT with a 2nd ring is preposterous in my opinion.
I don't hate Manning, he seems like a consummate competitor who loves the sport every bit as much as Tom does, has a fantastic football intellect, and as Primetime mentioned, he's a great enough QB to take a solid but not great receiver like Sanders, and make him look like an elite talent. He's probably one of the 10 best QBs to ever play the game, but I simply do not view him as being better than Tom.