jeremy2020
On the Roster
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 114
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Ross put the beer down...If BB is coming back as HC only?? I Don't want him back as GM so he can DRAFT the Best ST's players in the Fist and Second Rounds. Let's not forget who we are talking about here.I have to say I can’t really refute the comments that it felt like tanking in the second half. There was no urgency. But I just question why Bill would tank if he wasn’t going to be here next year. Maybe he already knows he’s not going anywhere and wants to lock up at least pick #2.
The Jets actually have some guys with talent on offense (and defense too). The reason they got Rodgers is because they were a QB away from competing.How? How does a team have a worse record than the utter joke that is the 2023 Jets
I don't think a second-round tackle is desperate. The Tackle depth in this draft is strong with round 1 and round 2 talent. The WR talent is 3 rounds deep. You won't need to reach for a Tackle at top of round 2 and you won't reach for a WR at top of round 3.If you're desperate, you can either take a 2nd round tackle, or trade back into the 1st round for a
Big problem is that you also need a WR.
^
I said don’t cry. Week 5 is almost here!
Dink and Dunking only gets you so far vs a QB like Mahomes, Allen, etc who can make every pinpoint throw on the field. Its not just the future HOF QBs either, Goff is throwing ball fantastic. Just like Moose Johnson said about the Mahomes TD pass in the back of the end zone.You can survive a bad arm, just can't survive bad decision-making. And the fact he's yet to put together a good second half this year is maddening. Which is frustrating because that wasn't an issue in his two full starts in 2022:
2nd Half vs Detroit:
View attachment 55322
2nd Half at Cleveland:
View attachment 55323
What's so difficult to understand that losing the next 3 games will be immensely more valuable to you in the long run?
I can't answer that for you. It's a bad take. It's your take.
You can watch however you like but the entertainment I get from them losing games that mean nothing known that it's going to make the off-season that much more entertaining isn't "less" entertaining than the way you approach it.
Just remember. Winning a couple useless games in 2020 is why we were picking 15 and grabbing the 5th QB in the first round instead of in the top 8.
Im not interested in repeating that.
That's not how probability works.The draft is a crap shoot and a higher draft pick is never any guarantee of a better player.
The 2021 NFL draft had a pile of crap for QBs except for Lawrence who is all hat and no cowboy.I complain about people here drafting in hindsight but in this case, I have to do it myself...
You do realize that the QB picked at #15 in the 2021 NFL draft has as many Pro Bowls as all 4 of the QBs picked before him? So if the Patriots had lost more games in 2020, they would have had drafted who then? Justin Fields? Trey Lance?
The draft is a crap shoot and a higher draft pick is never any guarantee of a better player.
That's not how probability works.
Let's say we're having a raffle and you get one pick of a number between 1 and 10 and I get the rest. The probability of me winning is much much higher than yours.
There are no guarantees in life. Like in my raffle example, you'd have a chance to win. Buy it's unlikely. Wouldn't you rather be the guy who has more numbers in the raffle than fewer? It doesn't guarantee anything, right?
So you want the Pats to draft scared or draft quantity over quality? That's what got them in thus mess their in. They're rarely aggressive in the draft (except to draft kickers, apparently). A top 3 pick gives you the best chance to find a franchise QB. I'm sorry if you don't believe it but it does. Most of the teams that pick that high pick the wrong guy or ruin him because they're a crapply run organization...which is why they're drafting that high.I don't understand your point here. We're not talking probability. The NFL draft has proven time & time again that a higher pick is no guarantee of drafting a better NFL player. Yes, if you suck, you get a higher draft pick. But that higher pick is no guarantee that the player could end up being better than one you pick later in the draft.
In the 2021 draft, which is what I was addressing in my earlier comments, there were 4 QBs picked before Mac Jones and only one of them (Trevor Lawrence) made the Pro Bowl, the same number of Pro Bowls as Mac.
If you look at those QBs closer, none of the eight QBs taken in the first 3 rounds of that draft have done much of anything. As a refresher:
No. 1: Trevor Lawrence, Jacksonville Jaguars
No. 2: Zach Wilson, New York Jets
No. 3: Trey Lance, San Francisco 49ers
No. 11: Justin Fields, Chicago Bears
No. 15: Mac Jones, New England Patriots
No. 64: Kyle Trask, Tampa Bay Buccaneers
No. 66: Kellen Mond, Minnesota Vikings
No. 67: Davis Mills, Houston Texans
If you read the numbers in this article, it would seem that any first round QB is a gamble.
Or, closer to home, Plunkett.Can’t get Carr from HOU out of my mind. Good QB who was ruined by a terrible O-line
So you want the Pats to draft scared or draft quantity over quality? That's what got them in thus mess their in. They're rarely aggressive in the draft (except to draft kickers, apparently). A top 3 pick gives you the best chance to find a franchise QB. I'm sorry if you don't believe it but it does. Most of the teams that pick that high pick the wrong guy or ruin him because they're a crapply run organization...which is why they're drafting that high.
Just remember. Winning a couple useless games in 2020 is why we were picking 15 and grabbing the 5th QB in the first round instead of in the top 8.
Micah Parsons was available though. In hindsight that was the right pick if the Pats were in position to get him.Again - what are you talking about?? I was responding to this:
He is saying that we should have tanked in 2020 to pick a better QB in the 2021 draft. There wasn't a better QB in that draft. Period.
History has shown that any QB taken in the first round is no guarantee that he'll be any good.
Micah Parsons was available though. In hindsight that was the right pick if the Pats were in position to get him.
The Jets are a better team overall.How? How does a team have a worse record than the utter joke that is the 2023 Jets
You can find a single bad draft at a position anywhere. You play the odds.I complain about people here drafting in hindsight but in this case, I have to do it myself...
You do realize that the QB picked at #15 in the 2021 NFL draft has as many Pro Bowls as all 4 of the QBs picked before him? So if the Patriots had lost more games in 2020, they would have had drafted who then? Justin Fields? Trey Lance?
The draft is a crap shoot and a higher draft pick is never any guarantee of a better player.
I went several years back and I found that there were 22 picks in the first round. Only 6 panned out if you don't count Jordan Love.I don't understand your point here. We're not talking probability. The NFL draft has proven time & time again that a higher pick is no guarantee of drafting a better NFL player. Yes, if you suck, you get a higher draft pick. But that higher pick is no guarantee that the player could end up being better than one you pick later in the draft.
In the 2021 draft, which is what I was addressing in my earlier comments, there were 4 QBs picked before Mac Jones and only one of them (Trevor Lawrence) made the Pro Bowl, the same number of Pro Bowls as Mac.
If you look at those QBs closer, none of the eight QBs taken in the first 3 rounds of that draft have done much of anything. As a refresher:
No. 1: Trevor Lawrence, Jacksonville Jaguars
No. 2: Zach Wilson, New York Jets
No. 3: Trey Lance, San Francisco 49ers
No. 11: Justin Fields, Chicago Bears
No. 15: Mac Jones, New England Patriots
No. 64: Kyle Trask, Tampa Bay Buccaneers
No. 66: Kellen Mond, Minnesota Vikings
No. 67: Davis Mills, Houston Texans
If you read the numbers in this article, it would seem that any first round QB is a gamble.
They've done extensive studies on how and why people use the internet and social media. When you look at the background information, in many cases, it's actually pretty pathetic, from cries for help to outright Sadism.Only a matter of time before he starts trolling the KC fanbase with the anti-mahomes rhetoric.
You two are arguing over two sides of the same coin.What's so difficult to understand that losing the next 3 games will be immensely more valuable to you in the long run?
I can't answer that for you. It's a bad take. It's your take.
You can watch however you like but the entertainment I get from them losing games that mean nothing known that it's going to make the off-season that much more entertaining isn't "less" entertaining than the way you approach it.
Just remember. Winning a couple useless games in 2020 is why we were picking 15 and grabbing the 5th QB in the first round instead of in the top 8.
Im not interested in repeating that.