Per Pete Prisco’s latest attempt at journalism, here is what the Patriots need to do this off-season:
New England Patriots
They have to improve their running game. The Patriots averaged 3.4 yards per rush, which is not what you would expect from a Bill Belichick-coached team. They simply didn't run the ball enough or well enough last season. That has to change to take some of the pressure off Tom Brady.
While I agree that Pats need to improve the running game, that crap about “this is not what you expect from a BB coached team†is completely WRONG.
Here is a look at the BB coached teams and what they did on the ground.
Year Atts Yards Average
1991 389 1360 3.50
1992 451 1607 3.56
1993 425 1701 4.00
1994 449 1657 3.69
1995 398 1482 3.72
2000 424 1390 3.28
2001 473 1793 3.79
2002 395 1508 3.82
2003 473 1607 3.40
2004 524 2134 4.07
2005 439 1512 3.44
If one takes out 2004’s 2,134 yards – which appears to be the exception and not the rule – 2006 was on par with the rest of BB’s career.
Here are the averages for the Cleveland years (1991-1995) and the first 4 of the Pats years (2000-2003):
Atts Yards Average
430.8 1567.2 3.64
Looks pretty close to 2006 doesn't it. Again, I agree with Prisco's point that the PAts should get the running game going again but he is wrong to imply that BB teams are driven by the run. He looked at 2004 and assumed all of BB's S.B teams were great running teams. It's just super lazy journalism.
Pete needs to do a little research or a least send his helpers out to do it for him.
New England Patriots
They have to improve their running game. The Patriots averaged 3.4 yards per rush, which is not what you would expect from a Bill Belichick-coached team. They simply didn't run the ball enough or well enough last season. That has to change to take some of the pressure off Tom Brady.
While I agree that Pats need to improve the running game, that crap about “this is not what you expect from a BB coached team†is completely WRONG.
Here is a look at the BB coached teams and what they did on the ground.
Year Atts Yards Average
1991 389 1360 3.50
1992 451 1607 3.56
1993 425 1701 4.00
1994 449 1657 3.69
1995 398 1482 3.72
2000 424 1390 3.28
2001 473 1793 3.79
2002 395 1508 3.82
2003 473 1607 3.40
2004 524 2134 4.07
2005 439 1512 3.44
If one takes out 2004’s 2,134 yards – which appears to be the exception and not the rule – 2006 was on par with the rest of BB’s career.
Here are the averages for the Cleveland years (1991-1995) and the first 4 of the Pats years (2000-2003):
Atts Yards Average
430.8 1567.2 3.64
Looks pretty close to 2006 doesn't it. Again, I agree with Prisco's point that the PAts should get the running game going again but he is wrong to imply that BB teams are driven by the run. He looked at 2004 and assumed all of BB's S.B teams were great running teams. It's just super lazy journalism.
Pete needs to do a little research or a least send his helpers out to do it for him.