I.M. Fletcher
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 1,726
- Reaction score
- 2,140
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments....As for Easley, we have no other DT who can pressure the QB comparatively. Whether or not we won without him means nothing. We had other players who could play that role last season, while we have struggled this season. Doesn't mean we can't win without him, it means we don't have another DT who can do what he does. hicks has been very good, but not your typical penetrating tackle.
This had me asking myself: What was the real story with Chris Jones? Or even of Dane Fletcher?
We could use both of them now, especially Jones. Sadly, the injuries have finally caught up to them.
2-4 their last 6 games, soon to be 2-5. They look absolutely cooked.
It always seems that after a Superbowl the following season we have the most injuries, coincidental or the product of long seasons???
That has never, to the best of my knowledge, been analyzed.. but something the NFLPA might want to look at when discussions are held regarding adding games ($$$$) to the schedule..
As far as Jones and Fletcher, I believe that they were simply two cases of players at positions that looked pretty deep when decision time came around 6 weeks or so ago. For example, we had Brown, Easley, Branch, Hicks, and Siliga as the 5 main DTs, so it would've been difficult to justify freeing up a roster position for Chris Jones in my opinion. I'm glad to have him in the mix for next year, although I'm also glad to see the improvement in competition and talent just the same.
Fletcher may/may not have been more of the same reasoning with Jones, or he may have simply been viewed as another LB with special teams ability. Either way, losing guys like Hightower, Freeny, and Easley makes these moves look questionable now, but I think they were relatively easy decisions at the time. Just my opinion of course. I could be off.
I think it is a little bit (30%) the 1-3 game longer season and mostly (50%) the 'beat the champs' factor (every opponent brings their A game & certain players bring the 'if I cant beat them, i might as well hurt somebody attitude'). Rest (20%) is just bad luck or bad trainer/dr staff, or the fact that pats grab a lot of lower draft 'damaged goods' and FA reclamation projects and sometimes doesnt work out.