So, ya think there are no grounds for a Brady defamation lawsuit?
http://www.boston.com/sports/footba...es-nosedive/rjErsFF9nE09jWTMyheuLP/story.html
".....Back in February, after winning the Super Bowl, the New England Patriots quarterback enjoyed a “trust score” in the top quartile of more than 3,750 celebrities, as indexed by sports and entertainment research firm Repucom,
according to The New York Times .
By the time the Wells Report came out in May, trust in Brady had dropped from 863rd to 3,097th. After a marginal increase,
The Times reported Wednesday that Brady’s trust score following his suspension appeal had plunged to 3,635th out of the 3,755 celebrities, at the same tier currently as Macauley Culkin and Britney Spears.
The Boston Globe reported in May that Brady’s “likability and merchandising potential” had fallen to the bottom 3 percent of celebrities surveyed by promotion agency The Marketing Arm, with the likes of Spears, 50 cent and Rex Ryan.
None of Brady’s commercial endorsers, including Uggs and Under Armour, have sacked the Super Bowl-winning quarterback. However, as a financial portfolio manager told
The Globe, “The team and Brady can both appeal the decision, but the brand damage has been done.......”