crew1954
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 526
- Reaction score
- 18
As long as he doesn't ever practice vs. the number 1 offense.
I'd put him on the offense as a lead blocker.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.As long as he doesn't ever practice vs. the number 1 offense.
...The guy is hard hitting and lets face it he didnt mean to intentionally hurt TFB or Gronk
...
Because he'd be a downgrade in coverage from the current penciled-in starter (Tavon Wilson).Why not?
Because he'd be a downgrade in coverage from the current penciled-in starter (Tavon Wilson).
LOL Didn't Tavon get benched halfway through the year for giving up 2 Long-bombs on almost IDENTICAL plays
Tavon is a completely different Safety. Pollard is a goon. We need a goon. Plus I don't want to play another team with Pollard on it. Too risky.
Seems as thought the Ravens are pulling the Colt Maneuver for last place so they get 1st pick in the 2014 draft===Clowney.
He's been released from the Ravens. Has killed the Pats in the past.
We're in need of a SS. We're in need of a veteran enforcer in our young secondary.
Why not? (Just don't let him close to Brady in practice...or Gronk... or Ridley)
LOL Didn't Tavon get benched halfway through the year for giving up 2 Long-bombs on almost IDENTICAL plays
Yeah, Wilson gave up two long TDs because he was a rookie. What's Pollard's excuse for being bad in coverage?LOL Didn't Tavon get benched halfway through the year for giving up 2 Long-bombs on almost IDENTICAL plays