Bobsyouruncle
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 5,836
- Reaction score
- 6,904
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Scribd will only let me read the first few pages. If anyone else has a pdf or something please post it.
I got it to work. I don't know how to upload PDFs.Can I upload a PDF file?
Works!Here it is in PDF format. I have never attempted uploading a PDF file. Hope it works.
Now, we understand that the Court in the Peterson case reached a different conclusion about how to interpret past precedent and that is now on appeal in the Eighth Circuit.
I don't worry about anyone looking at my pictures of my wife -- they have been lovely pictures, by the way, I want to say that on the record, but there is not a great demand of that or my pool cover because I don't have a pool.
So, there is one issue that's been raised and that is that their investigation and their role has been characterized as independent and that, there is some question in my mind not to suggest that they would not be anything but above board but I remember that, you know, I worked at a big firm at one time and with respect to our clients we were anything but independent, we were fierce in support of our clients and in all matters. And, in fact, I think Mr. Wells testified at the hearing that he was retained to support the decision of Mr. Goodell in this matter.
It gets ignored that the Wells report also noted that Mr. Brady's explanations for both his communications with Mr. Jastremski and following the championship game were not really credible.