Phokus
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 637
- Reaction score
- 4
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I mean, if you look at it based just on the numbers, they were great, but considering Cincy's LB corps were held together by string cheese, you'd think we would've absolutely destroyed them on every single run. Take away that one big run by Morris and the running game doesn't look THAT good.
take away the great randy moss catch the game is a lot closer..I mean, if you look at it based just on the numbers, they were great, but considering Cincy's LB corps were held together by string cheese, you'd think we would've absolutely destroyed them on every single run. Take away that one big run by Morris and the running game doesn't look THAT good.
I mean, if you look at it based just on the numbers, they were great, but considering Cincy's LB corps were held together by string cheese, you'd think we would've absolutely destroyed them on every single run. Take away that one big run by Morris and the running game doesn't look THAT good.
I mean, if you look at it based just on the numbers, they were great, but considering Cincy's LB corps were held together by string cheese, you'd think we would've absolutely destroyed them on every single run. Take away that one big run by Morris and the running game doesn't look THAT good.
Take away all the runs, and our running game sucked.
I woke up very concerned about our running game.
Take away my uncle's cojones and he's my auntie.
This thread is ridiculous.
I don't have concerns but do wonder why we didn't look more dominant against their defense which had only a handful of starters and at times only two linebackers. Given our talent and weapons, shouldn't we have put up a touchdown on every possession?
Besides kneel downs, the only two possessions the Patriots did not score on were the ones that were stalled because of penalties. Two false start calls on one led to a punt, and a holding penalty on the INT possession. I'd say the offense was pretty good, not to mention they held the ball for nearly 38 minutes. Looks like the game plan was successful.
I don't think that was our objective. I think that it had a lot to do with ball control and keeping the Bengal offense off the field. Not that we weren't trying to score all the time, but I got the total sense of our "offense" being in totally in control and writing the script exactly the way they wanted to. We didn't need 60-70 points, we needed 14, so we went out and got them and added another 20 for padding
That was my impression.
Take away the fact Tom Brady was born and we lose that game! We lose BIG!