Search results

It's funny how you guys will spin things. number of attemps don't matter but game time does? WOW!! even though Manning sat out some at the end of the seaon. I think it should be the other way around, took Brady more throws than Manning. You guys were the ones throwing in the Manning vs...

59-0 the Colts held him to 34 yards rushing So your Pats felt like they needed to put up 59 points to ensure a win?

might want to check the stats on that one...if you want to go there...Brady had mor attempts then Manning that year..so Manning did it on less attempts.

2nd and 4 from mid field....30 yard pass...1st down, yes... Another 15 yard pass...1st down....yes Eat clock....yes... what 40-50 seconds, another 5 yard pass...more points to make a win more likely...yes but you are already up by 21. Sportsmanship....NO

I can understand against some teams with an elite qb or top notch rb. Not rubbing it in but twice now the Colts have come back and burnt BB. But some teams there is no way say a Collins led 0'fer Titans team is coming back.

Weren't the Giants something like 8-8 the year you went 18-none?

I am just wondering why the only people who say no taping happened and or it had no effect are Pat fans. And why up by 21 late in a game and still throwing deep for Td's (not just to get 1st downs to run some clock) is sportsman like? thats all. Just trying to get a Pats fans side.

Whoa, still a touchy subject....must be wondering yourself.....

But you can see why the rest of the people out side of the New England area would question it though.

What media ESPN? which looks a lot like the pro-Pats channel or NFLN?, ya they will spin it to look bad for the Pats.

So what you are saying is..the Pats didn't use cameras to video opposing teams? That the media is just telling the general public that? And it is just some kind of anti-Pats/Kraft theory?

Just saying after the league got involved..........not much, heck look, even the Colts got there once without cameras...so maybe the Pats did too

Why even play them after the half? Collins going to get them back in the game?

Titans???? 59-0???? elite???? Really??

Don't go for it on 4th down up by six on YOUR own 28 either

Let's look back to when it all started to decline for the Pats.....Maybe they need the videos cameras back...aint done jack after...does make you kinda wonder......just sayin'

so why risk injury to the franchise QB? But yet up by 21 he will risk it so Brady can pad some stats?

would he have done that if the Pats were up by 21? don't think so. Regardless who the opponent was the following week. What would have you thought if after BB pulls starters, Brees continued to bomb the ball down field for a couple more TDs?

Why would he pull Brady down by 21? Not to risk injury? But up by 21, leave him in to continue throwing deep. (Running up the score?) No risk of injury there. Can't really beleive the Pats quit. No matter if it is spelled with an "e" or an "a", Peyton/Payton maybe in BB's head.

I still have a hard time with what I saw last night, The Pats quitting. Never thought I would see that. History shows 3 scores are possible in 5 minutes or even less. Stranger things have happened.