primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,627
- Reaction score
- 15,375
Just to be clear, this is not a ruling on the facts of the case. Any evidence of Brady's wrongdoing is problematic at best, non-existent garbage at worst. The CBA effectively gives the NFL the ability to appoint itself as the arbitrator in a binding arbitration, and the only appeal that can be made as a result of past SCOTUS rulings is based on procedure. So long as the NFL follows the rules its laid out, it can discipline as it wills.
It could throw Brady out of the league, force Rodgers to take a year without pay, and so on, without any particular need to justify its decision-making. As long as it does so using the strict procedures it's given, there's absolutely no legal recourse for the players. That's messed up on a lot of levels, but it's the state of the law and the CBA as it is now.
It could throw Brady out of the league, force Rodgers to take a year without pay, and so on, without any particular need to justify its decision-making. As long as it does so using the strict procedures it's given, there's absolutely no legal recourse for the players. That's messed up on a lot of levels, but it's the state of the law and the CBA as it is now.