PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

OT: Prince found dead


Status
Not open for further replies.


I enjoyed his music during the 80's -90 's and had a few of his albums. I would consider Prince one of the most impactful composers of his time for his genre. I would say that he had a wide range and the ability to create music that was fun and energetic to music that was soulful and deep.

I don't think he was the greatest guitarist or even a top 50 guitarist although there were times he played with a hint of Hendrix.

I hope he rests in peace and I hope he enjoyed his life.
 
If you are speaking as a guitarist and consider Prince a "virtuoso," your horizons need expanding. As far as I know, he never released a guitar album, only played guitar in the context of his songs. He WAS talented, he was a GOOD guitar player, not a virtuoso. Compare his playing to that of the players below. He does not approach most in their overall command of tone/phrasing/lyricality/timing.

Guitar virtuosos, off the top of my head. (If you are unfamiliar with them, look them up; most are in the realm of popular/rock music. I intentionally am excluding contemporary fusion/jazz/neoclassical guitar virtuosos.) If I sat down and thought about it I'd come up with more:

Uli Jon Roth
Steve Hackett
Michael Schenker
Carlos Santana
Leslie West
Ritchie Blackmore
Joe Satriani
Steve Vai
Steve Morse
Paul Gilbert
Todd Grubbs
Travis Larson
John Petrucci
Chris Poland
Marty Friedman
Eric Johnson
Martin Barre
Dweezil Zappa
Yngwie Malmsteen
Zakk Wylde
Eddie Van Halen
Tony Iommi
Jason Becker
Ted Nugent
Robert Fripp
Adrian Belew
Alex Lifeson
Vivian Campbell
Alex Skolnick
David Gilmour
Jeff Beck

Try topping that list off the top of your head ... I double-dare you! ;)

Let me know when you want to talk keyboardists.


Good list and I agree with your premise but Yngwie Malmsteen does not belong on that list. He was just a speed demon. "I can hit 20 notes a second"

Need to add Hendrix.

(I saw in a later post that you only listed living but Hendrix still lives man.....he lives through his music)
 
Why is Tune trolling a death thread?

Disappointed in the lack of coverage when his heroes Chris Squire and Lemmy died?

Dear Tune, talented musicians exist outside of the prog rock milieu. Prince was one of them. And he was a phenomenal guitarist, and could play all of the other instruments quite well too. This, together with his songwriting, singing, stage presence, style, etc, make him a very odd target of any kind of derision whatsoever. Save it for when Bono dies.
 
If you are speaking as a guitarist and consider Prince a "virtuoso," your horizons need expanding. As far as I know, he never released a guitar album, only played guitar in the context of his songs. He WAS talented, he was a GOOD guitar player, not a virtuoso. Compare his playing to that of the players below. He does not approach most in their overall command of tone/phrasing/lyricality/timing.

Guitar virtuosos, off the top of my head. (If you are unfamiliar with them, look them up; most are in the realm of popular/rock music. I intentionally am excluding contemporary fusion/jazz/neoclassical guitar virtuosos.) If I sat down and thought about it I'd come up with more:

Uli Jon Roth
Steve Hackett
Michael Schenker
Carlos Santana
Leslie West
Ritchie Blackmore
Joe Satriani
Steve Vai
Steve Morse
Paul Gilbert
Todd Grubbs
Travis Larson
John Petrucci
Chris Poland
Marty Friedman
Eric Johnson
Martin Barre
Dweezil Zappa
Yngwie Malmsteen
Zakk Wylde
Eddie Van Halen
Tony Iommi
Jason Becker
Ted Nugent
Robert Fripp
Adrian Belew
Alex Lifeson
Vivian Campbell
Alex Skolnick
David Gilmour
Jeff Beck

Try topping that list off the top of your head ... I double-dare you! ;)

Let me know when you want to talk keyboardists.
Where's Eric Clapton, Jimi Hendrix, and Keith Richards?
 
Just got back from viewing Purple Rain at the movies for the first time! I'm 28 & wasn't born when the film originally hit theaters! I had to experience it on the big screen! Folks were crying like babies by the end! R.I.P
 
Disappointed in the lack of coverage when his heroes Chris Squire and Lemmy died?

Dear Tune, talented musicians exist outside of the prog rock milieu. Prince was one of them. And he was a phenomenal guitarist, and could play all of the other instruments quite well too. This, together with his songwriting, singing, stage presence, style, etc, make him a very odd target of any kind of derision whatsoever. Save it for when Bono dies.
Save your bumbling sanctimony. If you want to presume lecturing about respect perhaps you might first show a little of your own, starting with bothering to read the exchanges which involve theoretical discussions about Prince's legacy specifically as a guitarist -- nothing at all derisive. Prince was very talented, very popular; never a question. Lemmy was not a prog artist by the way (shows how little you know, goofball). But if you want to diss the memories of Squire, Kilmister and Bono (before his time) in the process of "defending" Prince when no defense is called for, that's entirely on you.
 
Last edited:
Good list and I agree with your premise but Yngwie Malmsteen does not belong on that list. He was just a speed demon. "I can hit 20 notes a second"

Need to add Hendrix.

(I saw in a later post that you only listed living but Hendrix still lives man.....he lives through his music)
As noted earlier re. Hendrix and others, the list was off the cuff and involved only living players. Malmsteen is classically trained and has written original concertos for full orchestra, one of which he released on CD.
 
Save your bumbling sanctimony. If you want to presume lecturing about respect perhaps you might first show a little of your own, starting with bothering to read the exchanges which involve theoretical discussions about Prince's legacy specifically as a guitarist -- nothing at all derisive. Prince was very talented, very popular; never a question. Lemmy was not a prog artist by the way (shows how little you know, goofball). But if you want to diss the memories of Squire, Kilmister and Bono (before his time) in the process of "defending" Prince when no defense is called for, that's entirely on you.

i have minimal patience for this kind of goalpost moving. These are your words, Sir:

"But his was a very narrowly defined, primarily '80s phenomenon that didn't go far beyond himself or the Minneapolis scene in terms of "influence." Adam Ant was doing something similar with the "new romantic" movement in the U.K. about that same time."

Here, you say, in plain english, that Prince had minimal influence outside of Minnesota, and then you compare his legacy with Adam Ant. Many would feel this is derisive. And, no, it has nothing to with a discussion of Prince "specifically as a guitarist."

Nowhere did I diss Kilmister and Squire. Also fine musicians (by the way, Lemmy was a founding member of Hawkwind, which is considered by most to be a progressive rock band--i assumed that a "tunescribe" would know this, but guess not). I am merely suggesting that you are going after a great musician because he received more media attention than your recently fallen heroes. Im not sure you disagree with this?

I will leave it to the real musicians to define Prince's legacy. Im sure you know your small corner of the musical universe very well, but your comments clearly betray a lack of knowledge about the area in which Prince operated.
 
Last edited:
If you are speaking as a guitarist and consider Prince a "virtuoso," your horizons need expanding. As far as I know, he never released a guitar album, only played guitar in the context of his songs. He WAS talented, he was a GOOD guitar player, not a virtuoso. Compare his playing to that of the players below. He does not approach most in their overall command of tone/phrasing/lyricality/timing.

Guitar virtuosos, off the top of my head. (If you are unfamiliar with them, look them up; most are in the realm of popular/rock music. I intentionally am excluding contemporary fusion/jazz/neoclassical guitar virtuosos.) If I sat down and thought about it I'd come up with more:

Uli Jon Roth
Steve Hackett
Michael Schenker
Carlos Santana
Leslie West
Ritchie Blackmore
Joe Satriani
Steve Vai
Steve Morse
Paul Gilbert
Todd Grubbs
Travis Larson
John Petrucci
Chris Poland
Marty Friedman
Eric Johnson
Martin Barre
Dweezil Zappa
Yngwie Malmsteen
Zakk Wylde
Eddie Van Halen
Tony Iommi
Jason Becker
Ted Nugent
Robert Fripp
Adrian Belew
Alex Lifeson
Vivian Campbell
Alex Skolnick
David Gilmour
Jeff Beck

Try topping that list off the top of your head ... I double-dare you! ;)

Let me know when you want to talk keyboardists.
It's pretty clear that the music that guitarists create is a huge part of your definition of "virtuoso". Sure, Tony Iommi did come out with some classic rifts, but how could you include him in such a list with his limited technical mastery of the guitar? I agree that, from a guitar standpoint, Prince's music doesn't even compare with anyone on your list, but from a pure technical perspective, Prince would absolutely be near the top of that list.
 
Last edited:
i have minimal patience for this kind of goalpost moving. These are your words, Sir:

"But his was a very narrowly defined, primarily '80s phenomenon that didn't go far beyond himself or the Minneapolis scene in terms of "influence." Adam Ant was doing something similar with the "new romantic" movement in the U.K. about that same time."

Here, you say, in plain english, that Prince had minimal influence outside of Minnesota, and then you compare his legacy with Adam Ant. Many would feel this is derisive. And, no, it has nothing to with a discussion of Prince "specifically as a guitarist."

Nowhere did I diss Kilmister and Squire. Also fine musicians (by the way, Lemmy was a founding member of Hawkwind, which is considered by most to be a progressive rock band--i assumed that a "tunescribe" would know this, but guess not). I am merely suggesting that you are going after a great musician because he received more media attention than your recently fallen heroes. Im not sure you disagree with this?

I will leave it to the real musicians to define Prince's legacy. Im sure you know your small corner of the musical universe very well, but your comments clearly betray a lack if knowledge about the area in which Prince operated.
You're just not getting the genre-specific context of reference to "influence." His legacy was not compared to Adam Ant; again, it was a genre-specific reference to Prince as an original stylist and how that specifically was defined by the scene he created. If you were aware of the new-romantic movement in the U.K. concurrent with Prince's heyday in the U.S., you'd understand why I brought that into it. It was a reference point, not a comparison of overall legacy.

The goal post was not moved at all, if you had just followed along -- the conversation subsequently moved on to discussion of his instrumental prowess, guitar specifically. I'll spell this out for you so you're not confused any further: Prince did not create anything new as an original stylist in terms of a genre beyond the initial Minneapolis scene, which included Morris Day and others. This was distinguished by an interesting cross-pollination of rock, r&b and dance "culturalized" by overt sexual/romantic imagery and fashion, all showcased in the film Purple Rain.

That had its lifespan as a phenomenon. From that foundation, Prince launched an extremely successful and prolific career as a cross-genre chameleon -- a very talented composer/singer/multi-instrumentalist/entertainer who went on to enjoy longstanding worldwide popularity. His primary claim to fame was as composer/singer, though he was skilled at multiple instruments and studio work. While he dabbled in and borrowed from several genres, the primary basis of his music was r&b.

Of course, none of this has anything to do with progressive rock as much as you're trying to work that in sideways by way of disparagement. Big fail for you there, Letekro. (Yes, I'm well aware of Lemmy's roots with Hawkwind in the U.K.'s early free-festival scene. He was with them three years and was not regarded over his 40-year career with Motorhead as a "prog" artist, by any stretch.)
 
Last edited:
It's pretty clear that the music that guitarists create is a huge part of your definition of "virtuoso". Sure, Tony Iommi did come out with some classic rifts, but how could you include him in such a list with his limited technical mastery of the guitar? I agree that, from a guitar standpoint, Prince's music doesn't even compare with anyone on your list, but from a pure technical perspective, Prince would absolutely be near the top of that list.
No, the music itself largely is peripheral to the virtuosity of those listed. (This was discussed in other posts.) Nugent would be a good example of (mostly) mediocre compositions with great playing. To me, a genuine virtuoso combines extraordinary technical skill with a uniquely identifiable signature voice -- someone you can hear and know immediately who it is by their sound alone. There are many highly technically skilled players who don't achieve a recognizable voice.
 
You're just not getting the genre-specific context of reference to "influence." His legacy was not compared to Adam Ant; again, that was a genre-specific reference to Prince as an original stylist and how that specifically was defined by the scene he created. If you were aware of the new-romantic movement in the U.K. concurrent with Prince's heyday in the U.S., you'd understand why I brought that into it. It was a reference point, not a comparison of overall legacy.

The goal post was not moved at all, if you had just followed along -- the conversation subsequently moved on to discussion of his instrumental prowess, guitar specifically. I'll spell this out for you so you're not confused any further: Prince did not create anything new as an original stylist in terms of a genre beyond the early Minneapolis scene, which included Morris Day and others. This was distinguished by an interesting cross-pollination of rock, r&b and dance "culturalized" by overt sexual/romantic imagery and fashion.

That had its lifespan as a phenomenon. From that foundation, Prince launched an extremely successful and prolific career as a cross-genre chameleon -- a very talented composer/singer/multi-instrumentalist/entertainer who went on to enjoy longstanding worldwide popularity. His primary claim to fame was as composer/singer, though he was skilled at multiple instruments and studio work. Although he dabbled in and borrowed from several genres, the primary basis of his music was r&b.

Of course, none of this has anything to do with progressive rock as much as you're trying to work that in sideways by way of disparagement. Big fail for you on that front, Letekro. (Yes, I'm well aware of Lemmy's roots with Hawkwind in the U.K.'s early free-festival scene. He was with them three years and was not regarded over his 40-year career with Motorhead as a "prog" artist by any stretch.)

I am familiar with Prince's career. Thank you. I wouldn't say that he "created a genre", although that is not the only way a musician can be influential. As but one example, the way that he melded traditionally "white" and "black" styles was influential on music in the 80s.

I am mystified by your statements about me disparaging prog music, or hard rock (in the case of Lemmy, Ted Nugent, and others you listed), as I am a fan of many of its purveyors, and haven't said anything remotely against it. I was merely pointing out the disparity in media coverage between the recent deaths of Squire and Lemmy and that of Prince, and suggesting that is maybe what got you riled up on this one.
 
I don't know what type of person he was, but one of the greatest guitar players ever
 
I am mystified by your statements about me disparaging prog music, I was merely pointing out the disparity in media coverage between the recent deaths of Squire and Lemmy and that of Prince, and suggesting that is maybe what got you riled up on this one.
Oh good lord, knock it off. We both know why you brought prog music into this. The idea that I somehow am "riled up" over a disparity in media coverage re., Squire/Lemmy/Prince is beyond ridiculous. Squire and Lemmy received media coverage appropriate to their popularity with the mainstream. That's what "media coverage" is all about.
 
Oh good lord, knock it off. We both know why you brought prog music into this. The idea that I somehow am "riled up" over a disparity in media coverage re., Squire/Lemmy/Prince is beyond ridiculous. Squire and Lemmy received media coverage appropriate to their popularity with the mainstream. That's what "media coverage" is all about.

I was trying to give you an out for deriding an obviously influential and great artist upon his death. If that is not the reason, then you just feel strongly that he was not a great and influential artist. You are certainly entitled to your opinion.
 
I was trying to give you an out for deriding an obviously influential and great artist upon his death. If that is not the reason, then you just feel strongly that he was not a great and influential artist. You are certainly entitled to your opinion.
Even after all this, you think I "derided" the man. Perhaps you should consult the deity that has bestowed you the power to give others "an out" and ask him/her for remedial instruction in basic humility and fundamental cognition.
 
No, the music itself largely is peripheral to the virtuosity of those listed. (This was discussed in other posts.) Nugent would be a good example of (mostly) mediocre compositions with great playing. To me, a genuine virtuoso combines extraordinary technical skill with a uniquely identifiable signature voice -- someone you can hear and know immediately who it is by their sound alone. There are many highly technically skilled players who don't achieve a recognizable voice.
If that is the case, then you are rating Prince far too harshly. His technical mastery of the guitar would put him near the top of your list, and by any reasonable measure, much higher than Iommi. Sure, Iommi got much more skilled with age, but he's still not even in Prince's league. Cite Iommi's damaged fingers if you want, but his damaged ones are probably bigger than all of Princes tiny fingers.

For the record, I'm not a fan of most of Prince's music, but damn that guy can play a guitar.
 
Even after all this, you think I "derided" the man. Perhaps you should consult the deity that has bestowed you the power to give others "an out" and ask him/her for remedial instruction in basic humility and fundamental cognition.

Your words, Sir:

"But his was a very narrowly defined, primarily '80s phenomenon that didn't go far beyond himself or the Minneapolis scene in terms of "influence." Adam Ant was doing something similar with the "new romantic" movement in the U.K. about that same time."

Maybe "derision" is too far, but pretty harsh, in my opinion, given the man's contributions to music. Also, demonstrably false given the number of non-Minneapolis artists that claim him as an influence and/or have covered his songs.
 
Good list and I agree with your premise but Yngwie Malmsteen does not belong on that list. He was just a speed demon. "I can hit 20 notes a second"

Need to add Hendrix.

(I saw in a later post that you only listed living but Hendrix still lives man.....he lives through his music)

Yngwie completely changed the scene and really is the birth of 'shred'. Sure, there were other great and fast guitarists before him, using similar riffs, etc (Al Di Meola in the 70s, etc etc), but NO ONE had the attack and completely command as him. It's one thing to have a 'fast' line or two in a couple songs, it's completely another thing to completely showcase it on instrumentals and take it to a completely new stratosphere.

I also COMPLETELY disagree with the assertion that he was 'just speed'. He still might be the greatest improviser in neo-classical metal, his phrasing is as good as it get's for rock/metal, and he has very cool blues and hendrix-influenced playing. And then there's his vibrato/touch. I'd challenge you to find a SINGLE guitarist with better vibrato. It's a thing of beauty. If you are about to slam a legend for being one-dimensional (which he isn't), then all blues guitarists can be slammed for playing the same damn scale, licks, and chord progressions. It just doesn't work like that.

As for the list, they just don't work. A list of the most technically talented guitarists would be stupid long. You list Dweezil but not Frank Zappa, which I think is a huge mistake. No Shawn Lane? No Guthrie Govan, arguably the best all-around guitarist on the planet right now. And what style restrictions are there? Clearly if we are accepting fusion, there are dozens more guitarists that belong on the list. Tony MacAlpine, Greg Howe, George Bellas, Frank Gambale, Scott Henderson, Al Di Meola, Holdsworth, Mike Stern, McLaughlin, Kotzen, Metheny, Carlton, etc etc. None of these guys apart from Guthrie are 'contemporary'.

Edit: I completely apologize for using the word completely completely too often. That completes it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Patriots QB Drake Maye Conference Call
Patriots Now Have to Get to Work After Taking Maye
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf and Jerod Mayo After Patriots Take Drake Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Back
Top