Yet you didn't take issue with the person who posted that. I give reasons and clear discussion points and you jump all over it. With zero facts to substantiate any position you may have. Talk about hypocrisy.
I don't like what I think. I don't want to think what I do. I'm not the only one who feels this way, and if you look at it as a court would then the evidence begs the questions I asked. So if that upsets your sensibilities, then I can't help you. That goes for anyone who has made a dismissive quip about my position.
What, am I supposed to police the whole board for dopiness, fer crissakes? Fine...
They never want to hear that the superbowl was given to them and guaranteed in like week 6 of last season
This is dopey.
OK?
But anyway, look, I understand the frustration. The league is populated by many mediocre and corrupt men. Deflategate is an absolute travesty. But to go from that to this nonsense about "guaranteed in week 6" and "maybe Belichick was in on it," (actually, I see why your post forced a response, by bringing in the Pats and Belichick you definitely made it much worse), anyway, all that stuff, is idiotic.
It's easy to get sucked into the vortex, that's how all conspiracy theories start. Check out the recent movie about all the coo-coo theories around
The Shining. They're all crazy (one is that Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landing and the movie was his admission of guilt/cry for help) but you listen to them, and the people who believe them are so convinced of it, damned if it doesn't start to seem pretty reasonable.
But it's not. And this isn't. The Pats gave up TDs to the Broncos because the defense (be it strategy and/or execution) was poor. That's it. No conspiracy. As for "facts to substantiate" that, life's too short to spend time debunking nutty conspiracies. Really, it's too short to write this long a post about it, but what the hell.
