But the question is not a hypothetical. Based on your observation during the game, does this implementation provide sufficient additional information to make them useful?
But the question is not a hypothetical. Based on your observation during the game, does this implementation provide sufficient additional information to make them useful?
I would think. It is certainly not an exact science out there and its not right when any team gets screwed etc. So, if its financially prudent why not. The game is messed up enough by all the interpretation of what is PI what is not.
Anything that can help make the game less reliant on human senses is good in my book.
This ridiculous "league" heirarchy can't afford cameras on the goal line but then can afford FIVE MILLION DOLLARS concocting the most brain dead submoronic "gate" in sport history.
Nothing improves until that pathological liar and unbelievably overt megalomaniac Goodell is removed along with his cadre of ridiculous, hate filled, scumbag pinheads.
yeah, the pregame build up was sickening..."Andy made the pro bowl TWICE so far!!!"...."AJ has gone to FOUR pro bowls...FOUR!!!"
well, the red headed ginger is just a micron ahead of the moronic ginger moron heading up the NFL as far as brain power goes...and AJ Green?...c'mon, he's stoned out there RIGHT NOW...no "all pro" has more key drops and passes turned into INT's than AJ Smokesgreen..
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.