- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 49,630
- Reaction score
- 28,347
Ok, with the Pats going to their 9th AFC Championship in the Brady/Belichick era and their fourth in a row, I think we should address that debate of would you rather be the Giants or the Pats? In other words would you rather be a team that is vastly inconsistent from year to year and won two Super Bowls in the last decade or a perennial Super Bowl contender, but hasn't won in a decade.
The simple easy answer would be take the Super Bowls, but I don't know if it is that simple. Sure the Giants won the Super Bowl three years ago, but haven't played a meaningful game in January since. In fact, they haven't played a meaningful game in December in the last two years. Do you sacrifice years of having a team to root for that are out of playoff contention in early December for a number of years or do you want a team that is playing meaningful football in January year after year.
I think if I am a Jets fan, I take the Super Bowl and even if it means the team will be sub .500 for the next ten years, but as a Pats' fan, I don't think it is that simple. I think I might rather have the fact the Pats are in the hunt for the Super Bowl year after year.
At some point, this run is going to end and we are going to remember what it was like to know your team is out of playoff contention by Thanksgiving. Some of the younger fans may not even know what that feels like. I will tell them it is pretty crappy. Hopefully, they won't have to experience it in a long time.
Sure I want to the Super Bowl win. Who doesn't? But I think we all take it for granted that year in and year out that this team is playing football in mid to late January. For those who want to trade the Super Bowl ring for years of mediocre teams and missing the playoffs, I think they may regret this thinking after the short term euphoria of winning the Super Bowl wears off and they would have have to suffer through years of bad Patriots football.
I bet many Giants' fans wished their team was like the Pats competing for a Super Bowl right now.
The simple easy answer would be take the Super Bowls, but I don't know if it is that simple. Sure the Giants won the Super Bowl three years ago, but haven't played a meaningful game in January since. In fact, they haven't played a meaningful game in December in the last two years. Do you sacrifice years of having a team to root for that are out of playoff contention in early December for a number of years or do you want a team that is playing meaningful football in January year after year.
I think if I am a Jets fan, I take the Super Bowl and even if it means the team will be sub .500 for the next ten years, but as a Pats' fan, I don't think it is that simple. I think I might rather have the fact the Pats are in the hunt for the Super Bowl year after year.
At some point, this run is going to end and we are going to remember what it was like to know your team is out of playoff contention by Thanksgiving. Some of the younger fans may not even know what that feels like. I will tell them it is pretty crappy. Hopefully, they won't have to experience it in a long time.
Sure I want to the Super Bowl win. Who doesn't? But I think we all take it for granted that year in and year out that this team is playing football in mid to late January. For those who want to trade the Super Bowl ring for years of mediocre teams and missing the playoffs, I think they may regret this thinking after the short term euphoria of winning the Super Bowl wears off and they would have have to suffer through years of bad Patriots football.
I bet many Giants' fans wished their team was like the Pats competing for a Super Bowl right now.
Last edited: