bogengames
On the Roster
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 77
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Why narrow it down to 3 drives? Why not include them all?
Why narrow it down to 3 drives? Why not include them all?
I'm absolutely with you. I always thought and still believe Ridley is a better back than Vereen, Blount, and Gray. He makes really good cuts and hits the holes harder than the other guys. And he is a better goal line runner than the rest of them.Ridley was, by far, the most dynamic back on this team. Capable of pounding it up the A and B gaps or cutting it outside. The defense couldn't get a read as easily on run or pass when he was in the game like they can when the team uses Blount or Vereen. Yes, his loss has been one of the reasons why the offense is sputtering. But thanks for your important contribution.
I hated when they throw on a 3rd and short trying to fool the defense. Pound the ^%#$@ football!!! 4th and inches is better than punting!
Because this thread is about the Pats getting off to a slow start and not about the running game in general.
Because this is a discussion about slow starts, the first 3 drives are the start, is most cases the third drive ended in the 2nd quarter of the game.
I'm absolutely with you. I always thought and still believe Ridley is a better back than Vereen, Blount, and Gray. He makes really good cuts and hits the holes harder than the other guys. And he is a better goal line runner than the rest of them.
Not sure how big of an impact his absence has made but I do think his presence is missed.
Fair enough. I'll keep it within the first three drives to stay within the context of the thread topic.
Based on the drives presented by chasa, the Patriots scored 44 points on 18 drives, meaning they were nearly averaging a field goal per drive. If you throw out the KC game, where he got two touches and the offense went into pass-first mode early on, they scored 44 points on 15 drives and averaged 3 points per drive. I'm not saying that Ridley's loss is the sole reason for the offense hurting, particularly at the beginning of games. But it is certainly something to be considered. You don't lose the most dynamic back on your roster and have your offense be better off for it.
The coaches disagree with you, based on how little they used him.
3. Ridley injury.
There you have it. Against softer defenses, the offense can light up the scoreboard like a pinball machine from the get go. Against better defenses we'll continue to see these slow starts.
I really wish they'd start with the no-huddle
when the OL is sluggish, nobody was better at getting + yardage than him.