PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Reid vs BB at developing QBs


Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn’t say the QB isn’t important I said the combined efforts of 6 of the 11 offensive starters on a team 22nd in passing were a bigger contribution than that of the QB. You seem to think blocking, rushing and catching don’t matter, the Qb can do it all himself.
Yet they sucked under Bledsoe, quarterback is the most important position in football, there’s not much of a debate.

They were a top 10 passing team via DVOA, up from 17th in 2000. I guess the running back was a major change to that
 
Yet they sucked under Bledsoe, quarterback is the most important position in football, there’s not much of a debate.

They were a top 10 passing team via DVOA, up from 17th in 2000. I guess the running back was a major change to that
They sucked without all the other players they brought in.
If you had watched the 2000 team you would know with OL RB and Defense not being substantially upgraded they would not have won.
DVOA lol.

The difference was mostly the defense. From their 5-5 record they never allowed more than 17 points in a game and win out. Want to check and see what they record is of teams allowing 17 or fewer points? I suppose that’s because of Brady?
 
+ Montana too

Easy to say X wouldn’t win 6 without Y and absolutely if Y wasn’t anything special but what if Y was great too? Put Brady with Reid and they could have done some awesome things. Put BB with Peyton and ditto. At least in theory. I don’t know if those two would have gelled together…
Exactly. Again, without the massive edge, we'd have to listen to the talking heads debate how great of a player Brady really was. You can argue that he may have potentially won multiple championships with somebody else, but I think it's highly doubtful he would have won six. I mean, Payton had Brees, Dungy had Manning, etc. Even great QBs can't overcome bad coaching in critical moments. We've already seen that to be proven true enough to know that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sb1
They sucked without all the other players they brought in.
If you had watched the 2000 team you would know with OL RB and Defense not being substantially upgraded they would not have won.
DVOA lol.

The difference was mostly the defense. From their 5-5 record they never allowed more than 17 points in a game and win out. Want to check and see what they record is of teams allowing 17 or fewer points? I suppose that’s because of Brady?
Efficient offense helps the defense, you don’t like analytics because it paints a picture you don’t want to see. It’s why you’ll use passing yards to discredit the offensive improvement.

Nobody is saying Brady was dominant, but he certainly helped improve the team the second he stepped on the field, and that’s not debatable. You can continue to think it’s all coincidence, while everybody else watches teams built without him struggle
 
Last edited:
Efficient offense helps the defense, you don’t like analytics because it paints a picture you don’t want to see. It’s why you’ll use passing yards to discredit the offensive improvement.
I don’t like “analytics” because they are misused by people like you, as you did here.
You just said “passing DVOA” improving from 17 to 10 is exclusively why they won the SB despite the running game improving from 424/1390/9/3.3 to 473/1793/15/3.8. And the defense allowing 66 fewer points, allowing 17 or less for the last 9 games (an unheard of feat) and d/st scoring 42 more points.

Clearly if the offense helped the defense the running game improvement was a huge factor.
 
Efficient offense helps the defense, you don’t like analytics because it paints a picture you don’t want to see. It’s why you’ll use passing yards to discredit the offensive improvement.

Nobody is saying Brady was dominant, but he certainly helped improve the team the second he stepped on the field, and that’s not debatable. You can continue to think it’s all coincidence, while everybody else watches teams built without him struggle
Of course Brady made the team better, but he was a piece. It is ignorant to dismiss the other 52 players (and coaches) and the play of all the additions and say, as you have, it was essentially all Brady. They upgraded 6 other offensive positions and you literally said Brady had more to do with winning than all 6 combined plus the improvement in the defense.
 
I don’t like “analytics” because they are misused by people like you, as you did here.
You just said “passing DVOA” improving from 17 to 10 is exclusively why they won the SB despite the running game improving from 424/1390/9/3.3 to 473/1793/15/3.8.
No I didn’t, that’s the narrative you are trying to spin this into. I can accuse you of using a yardage stat to call the offense trash. I simply showed you the passing offense was very good. The rushing DVOA in 01 was 14th up from 27th. The passing game is always and will always be more important than the running game.
And the defense allowing 66 fewer points, allowing 17 or less for the last 9 games (an unheard of feat) and d/st scoring 42 more points.

Clearly if the offense helped the defense the running game improvement was a huge factor.
Sure, and it randomly all clicked when the quarterback change was made. And then un clicks in years he’s not the qb. I know what it tells me
 
No I didn’t, that’s the narrative you are trying to spin this into. I simply showed you the passing offense was very good. The rushing DVOA in 01 was 14th up from 27th. The passing game is always and will always be more important than the running game.

Sure, and it randomly all clicked when the quarterback change was made.
It wasn’t random it was one of the biggest roster overhauls in nfl history.

Again, you don’t understand the game. With the 2000 OL and running game Brady would not have been close to as effective. The patriots were among the highest run % teams.
It’s ok to accept that Brady was just a piece who did his job in 2001. It doesn’t take away from what he later became. Put some faith in his legacy, it’s fine, being honest won’t hurt it
 
Does it matter? Because the question involved other coaches…so…? o_O
I think I answered it but going back to your original question...
But does Brady win six elsewhere?
It's definitely possible. He won a 7th elsewhere (at age 43), the Patriots had a championship drought in the prime of Brady's career (certainly Bill should have gotten more out of that timeframe and I think other head coaches would have as well), and the Patriots left more championships on the table (2015 and 2017).

That’s the most contradictory three sentences I may have ever read.

And no, I don’t think he wins six, and even 3-4 doesn’t allow him to pull away and shut up the talking heads. Especially now that Mahomes has two and has - in theory - plenty of years left in this league.
Well, he won 7, so 6 doesn't seem implausible had he played for examples Indianapolis or Pittsburgh.

I think Bill had more to do with the first 3 championships than the latter 3, although the defense stifled the Rams offense in SB 53, but the most extraordinary part of that postseason was Brady's three consecutive 3rd-10 conversions in OT of the AFCCG on the road in KC. That's an example of something that couldn't have been duplicated by any other quarterback in the history of the NFL. Along with the 4th quarter of SB 49 and the 28-3 comeback. That innate clutchness, which Brady remarkably had his entire career, was something he would have had anywhere.

it’s been three years post-Brady. I get that the Cleveland years boost your argument and that you discard the trend that team was on, the context for the final season, the 11-5 2008 season and the 3-1 in 2016, and you’re not a fan of the 10-7 2021 season. It is what it is. He’s had two bad years since Brady left, the second I’d say he bears responsibility for.
Well, that's not entirely truthful. The context of the final season in Cleveland is overplayed to excuse away Bill completely losing his team... they were 2-10 after September (the move was announced in November), they were bad on offense and defense, and they went 4-12 the following season in Baltimore. I call that trending down.

The 11-5 2008 season is the most overrated Belichick "accomplishment" ever. In 2016 they got shutout by Buffalo in Foxboro. After Brady returned, they hung 41 on Buffalo in Orchard Park. Arguably 2016 was Brady greatest season. And I'm not a fan of the 10-7 2021 season because it was actually 10-8 with a 1-4 finish and a humiliating playoff loss to Buffalo. We agree though, Belichick blatantly screwed up the 2022 season, and possibly ruined his franchise quarterback in the process, we'll see on this.

The season has to play out, as you like to point out, but if they finish 3rd in the division at 9-8 and out of the playoffs again, then I think Kraft has to call it a wrap on Belichick. It could be even worse than that, possibly 4th with a healthy Tua in Miami, or better if they sign Hopkins. We'll see but even with a best case scenario I don't see them winning the division which is probably the positioning they would need to win a playoff game.
 
No I didn’t, that’s the narrative you are trying to spin this into. I can accuse you of using a yardage stat to call the offense trash. I simply showed you the passing offense was very good. The rushing DVOA in 01 was 14th up from 27th. The passing game is always and will always be more important than the running game.

Sure, and it randomly all clicked when the quarterback change was made. And then un clicks in years he’s not the qb. I know what it tells me
And actually it all “clicked” after losing to the Rams when the defense allowed 17 or less 9 straight games.
 
It wasn’t random it was one of the biggest roster overhauls in nfl history.
You said they were 22nd in passing in 2001, based off what?
Again, you don’t understand the game. With the 2000 OL and running game Brady would not have been close to as effective. The patriots were among the highest run % teams.
This is your opinion, which cannot be proven, what is proven is that they sucked under Bledsoe
It’s ok to accept that Brady was just a piece who did his job in 2001. It doesn’t take away from what he later became. Put some faith in his legacy, it’s fine, being honest won’t hurt it
I do, he did his job in 2001 very well, and was a major factor in why they won the Super Bowl.
 
And actually it all “clicked” after losing to the Rams when the defense allowed 17 or less 9 straight games.
They were 5-2 before that game w/Brady. 0-2 before Brady started. I’d say it clicked right around the time bledsoe got caved in

Just like in 2008, 2020, 2021,2022 and the 1990s, something didn’t click
 
It’s ok to accept that Brady was just a piece who did his job in 2001.
LOL!!! "Just a piece"... that's ****ing outrageous! The god damn team was 5-13 with Bledsoe and Belichick. With Brady they went 14-3 and won the Super Bowl on a game-winning drive from the quarterback. Get real, brother.
 
I think I answered it but going back to your original question...

It's definitely possible. He won a 7th elsewhere (at age 43), the Patriots had a championship drought in the prime of Brady's career (certainly Bill should have gotten more out of that timeframe and I think other head coaches would have as well), and the Patriots left more championships on the table (2015 and 2017).


Well, he won 7, so 6 doesn't seem implausible had he played for examples Indianapolis or Pittsburgh.

I think Bill had more to do with the first 3 championships than the latter 3, although the defense stifled the Rams offense in SB 53, but the most extraordinary part of that postseason was Brady's three consecutive 3rd-10 conversions in OT of the AFCCG on the road in KC. That's an example of something that couldn't have been duplicated by any other quarterback in the history of the NFL. Along with the 4th quarter of SB 49 and the 28-3 comeback. That innate clutchness, which Brady remarkably had his entire career, was something he would have had anywhere.


Well, that's not entirely truthful. The context of the final season in Cleveland is overplayed to excuse away Bill completely losing his team... they were 2-10 after September (the move was announced in November), they were bad on offense and defense, and they went 4-12 the following season in Baltimore. I call that trending down.

The 11-5 2008 season is the most overrated Belichick "accomplishment" ever. In 2016 they got shutout by Buffalo in Foxboro. After Brady returned, they hung 41 on Buffalo in Orchard Park. Arguably 2016 was Brady greatest season. And I'm not a fan of the 10-7 2021 season because it was actually 10-8 with a 1-4 finish and a humiliating playoff loss to Buffalo. We agree though, Belichick blatantly screwed up the 2022 season, and possibly ruined his franchise quarterback in the process, we'll see on this.

The season has to play out, as you like to point out, but if they finish 3rd in the division at 9-8 and out of the playoffs again, then I think Kraft has to call it a wrap on Belichick. It could be even worse than that, possibly 4th with a healthy Tua in Miami, or better if they sign Hopkins. We'll see but even with a best case scenario I don't see them winning the division which is probably the positioning they would need to win a playoff game.
In 2016 they played buffalo with a rookie 3rd string QB with a throwing hand injury who would not have played if there was anyone else.
Was last years AFFCG SF offense Shanahans fault?
 
They were 5-2 before that game w/Brady. 0-2 before Brady started. I’d say it clicked right around the time bledsoe got caved in

Just like in 2008, 2020, 2021,2022 and the 1990s, something didn’t click
They were 5-3 in Brady’s first 8 games. Clicking is when you close out 9-0 not when you are 5-3.

But let’s do this.
Which was more critical of the Patriots 2001 SB championship.
A defense that allowed 17 or less 9 consecutive games when 1 loss would have probably meant elimination or QB play? I won’t even say offense because you think Brady contributed more than every other offensive player combined.
 
LOL!!! "Just a piece"... that's ****ing outrageous! The god damn team was 5-13 with Bledsoe and Belichick. With Brady they went 14-3 and won the Super Bowl on a game-winning drive from the quarterback. Get real, brother.
The roster that was 5-11 in 2000 and the roster then won the SB the next year were as different as maybe there ever has been in the NFL.
2000 has nothing to do with 2001.

Are you honestly telling me that you watched those games in 2001 and said Brady carried them and they were the same team as 2000?
 
In 2016 they played buffalo with a rookie 3rd string QB with a throwing hand injury who would not have played if there was anyone else.
Was last years AFFCG SF offense Shanahans fault?
No dummy, the 49ers literally had to go exclusively to their running game. In 2016 Brissett completed 17 of 27 pass attempts, he wasn't crippled, he wasn't any good. The game plan sucked, obviously, 0 points. Buffalo couldn't have shutout Brady blindfolded and throwing lefthanded.
 
I think I answered it but going back to your original question...

It's definitely possible. He won a 7th elsewhere (at age 43), the Patriots had a championship drought in the prime of Brady's career (certainly Bill should have gotten more out of that timeframe and I think other head coaches would have as well), and the Patriots left more championships on the table (2015 and 2017).
No - it's highly unlikely. You have to just accept that.
Well, he won 7, so 6 doesn't seem implausible had he played for examples Indianapolis or Pittsburgh.
Absolutely does. Again, both coaches had Manning and Roethlisberger respectively. And barely won two.
Well, that's not entirely truthful. The context of the final season in Cleveland is overplayed to excuse away Bill completely losing his team... they were 2-10 after September (the move was announced in November), they were bad on offense and defense, and they went 4-12 the following season in Baltimore. I call that trending down.
Also not accurate. They opened the season 3-1. And the rumors swirled internally long before it was announced officially.
The 11-5 2008 season is the most overrated Belichick "accomplishment" ever. In 2016 they got shutout by Buffalo in Foxboro.
They could have gone 5-11 or 8-8 if Bill was so terrible, but they didn't. And, they got shutout with a guy with an injured thumb at QB. The things you point out sometimes to make a point are so weird. :confused:
 
They were 5-3 in Brady’s first 8 games. Clicking is when you close out 9-0 not when you are 5-3.

But let’s do this.
Which was more critical of the Patriots 2001 SB championship.
A defense that allowed 17 or less 9 consecutive games when 1 loss would have probably meant elimination or QB play? I won’t even say offense because you think Brady contributed more than every other offensive player combined.
The guy who touches the ball every play, is the most important player on the team. And always will be

The defense can still be great with a non functional qb and not accomplish anything. Hence 2021
 
Last edited:
No dummy, the 49ers literally had to go exclusively to their running game. In 2016 Brissett completed 17 of 27 pass attempts, he wasn't crippled, he wasn't any good. The game plan sucked, obviously, 0 points. Buffalo couldn't have shutout Brady blindfolded and throwing lefthanded.
Guess you weren’t a fan yet. Brissett certainly was crippled, right up until kickoff people expected Edelman to play QB. Those 27 passes were screens and dump offs, he couldn’t grip the ball the throw downfield, and everyone knew it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 5/7: News and Notes
What Did Tom Brady Say During His Netflix Roast?  Here’s the Full Transcript
What Did Drew Bledsoe Say at Tom Brady’s Netflix Roast? Here’s the Full Transcript
What Did Belichick Say at Tom Brady’s Netflix Roast?  Here’s the Full Transcript
Monday Patriots Notebook 5/6: News and Notes
Tom Brady Sustains, Dishes Some Big Hits on Netflix Roast Special
TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo on the Rich Eisen Show From 5/2/24
Patriots News And Notes 5-5, Early 53-Man Roster Projection
New Patriots WR Javon Baker: ‘You ain’t gonna outwork me’
Friday Patriots Notebook 5/3: News and Notes
Back
Top