- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,333
- Reaction score
- 105,289
Glad someone isnt spewing mindless opinions to get attention and actually doing research and focused on informing people who need help like me
Like how he slams that smarmy Globe elitist Gasper.
Supreme Court's History Shows Tom Brady's DeflateGate Fight Has A Chance
Like how he slams that smarmy Globe elitist Gasper.
Let’s take a closer look at some of the cases heard by the Supreme Court in recent years to get an answer.
2015 term: DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia
Here, the Supreme Court voted to overturn a California state court’s decision regarding an arbitration agreement between satellite TV provider DirectTV and its customers. The ruling “serves notice that efforts by courts to circumvent arbitration agreements will not be tolerated.”
Hey, that sounds vaguely familiar, doesn’t it?
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who will be the one who decides whether Brady and the NFLPA’s case is worthy of Supreme Court consideration, dissented with the Court’s opinion, writing, “This Court has again expanded the scope of the FAA, further degrading the rights of consumers and further insulating already powerful economic entities from liability for unlawful acts.”
Hmm … “insulating already powerful economic entities from liability for unlawful acts.” Interesting.
Supreme Court's History Shows Tom Brady's DeflateGate Fight Has A Chance
Last edited: