FrodoBagginz
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,463
- Reaction score
- 6,519
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Joe, I get it. It was not up to your standards. But this will make you feel better. As bad as you think this is the NFL is such deep **** right now there is not much that could derail the Pats case. This is a lot bigger than the meaning of deflator. Even if the Pats are found guilty (which they wont) that still dosent change the fact that the NFL is gone too far.this legal team didn't even fix the glaring typo. when anderson cooper or rachel nichols chuckle at 'weight loss' we have a major problem.
maybe they didn't think this through.
i can't get rid of the bad after taste. i think we went to far. the whole rebuttal had enough goodies. but one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch. just very disappointing if you ask me.
Brady all he way.....I literally had someone get pissy with me at work today about the Patriots being cheaters, they hate Brady etc...I asked did you actually read either report, they said no....I said well than don't talk to me about it, it's people like you that are the problem, just going off the headlines! Screw the haters!
Make Brady the King and make Belichick General of the Military. Belichick's intelligence will easily outmatch the rest of the country in case we invade and conquer the rest of the U.S.
"We're on to New York."
this legal team didn't even fix the glaring typo. when anderson cooper or rachel nichols chuckle at 'weight loss' we have a major problem.
maybe they didn't think this through.
i can't get rid of the bad after taste. i think we went to far. the whole rebuttal had enough goodies. but one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch. just very disappointing if you ask me.
they weren't under oath. they can change the narrative. weight loss argument killed the credibility of the entire report - that's the consensus verdict around the country. yeah, it's sad because everything else kicked ass.
more like grasping at straws. why is it so hard to understand that this won't help the case? truth or no truth, this just make us look really bad. make us really desperate.
I care more about the draft picks and the four game suspension than what the media/people think about sound bites. If you feel otherwise because it makes you angry to read all the ridicule and hearing **** from your coworkers (or whatever) then let me break the ugly truth for you. It would have happened anyway.
Of course "real" PSI can be determined, gauges can be brought into line league-wide, they can be periodically checked, etc. -- but that would take actually giving a **** prior to the sting operation.
And it's not even that hard to do. P = nRT/V. R is a constant, so it doesn't matter; if you know what n, T, and V are, then you know what P is supposed to be from the ideal gas law. (Heck, if we want to be really precise, we can use the van der Waals equation and adjust for the fact that we have a real gas rather than an ideal one, but it'll make almost no difference under ordinary conditions.)
Nobody should, did, nor will unless it involves the Patriots.Also - now that we think that flatter balls are somehow "better," rather than what Brady prefers (and we all know that he prefers them at the 12.5 range,) how do we let the elements get away with making balls flatter? Shouldn't they check them at every change of possession or something? Hell, they can stick a chip in the ball you can read out with an iPhone or something without releasing air from the valve, and have NFL go-fers reinflate to the proper range every time a ball is put in play.
If anybody truly gave a **** about this it could be solved way ahead of time.