PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Patriots Legal Counsel Rebuttal of Wells Report


Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not really important what the media thinks. What's important is what the arbitrator and the courts think. If they agree with the context (which I find compelling, but I am admittedly bias) the media will come to our side claiming they were suspicious of the Wells report all along and hoping we'll forget the trashing they gave the Patriots.

It's also significant that Kraft would agree to this. Ladies and Gentleman, we are at war.
 
People have their narratives that they want to follow and see in this report. Each side is going to stick to their guns.

That's why the media doesn't matter at this point. At this point, it's all preparation for the appeal and the court case. Personally, I think this response was a bad idea, but this may have been something Kraft felt was important as some kind of "this is what happened" to the other owners.
 
volin's playing both sides.

so mcnally was known as the " deflator " because he wanted to lose weight? can this circus just end already. that sounds outrageous!:D

How so? That was a word in a text a year ago. Both men, involved with deflating Tom's footballs to
the lower limit. Deflating was a word they used often and so when they worked out the fat guy referred to himself at the deflator, the guy trying to lose weight. Wells never asked them about the context of the word just used it to build his report.

Using job language in other contexts not uncommon.
 
Can someone on Twitter Tweet this link to Volin:

https://wellsreportcontext.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/nep_psi_excerpts-from-emails-5_13_15-2.pdf



https://twitter.com/BenVolin/status/598882929264189440

They explain on the website that it was agreed to that every person would be interviewed once barring exceptional circumstances.

Also, how is it "stonewalling" if Wells says, give me any communications that are relevant, and Brady says there aren't any? How the hell is that stonewalling? Idiot.
 
SI's Andrew Brandt asks an IMHO very reasonable question -- if Jastremski's and McNally's behavior are as innocent as the rebuttal claims it is, why did NE indefinitely suspend them even before the NFL punishment came down?

They can claim those disparaging messages about Brady were the reason. The NFL took it further by making it near impossible for both of them to ever get back into the league.
 
Looks like Kraft got himself an anger translator
anger_luther1.jpg
 
Bert Breer doesn't buy it, shockingly.

Their whole argument rests on the assumption that the Patriots are lying. They will look terrible if they have to walk back that assumption. Better to double-down on their stupidity than admit that they were wrong.

Don't worry, when the Patriots are fully exonerated, these people will just say that they were right to make that assumption...past history..blah blah blah.
 
It was reported they were both suspended without pay by the Patriots on May 6th. Why?


Probably because Bob Kraft at one point was going to bend over and accept the punishment. He was most likely thinking the 2 guys need to be suspended since the NFL was going to suspend them anyways. He also most likely thought Brady would get a small fine and possibly a 1 game suspension.

Never did he think the NFL would be so harsh. And that is when he got balls and decided enough is enough and he is not going to take it anymore.
 
SI's Andrew Brandt asks an IMHO very reasonable question -- if Jastremski's and McNally's behavior are as innocent as the rebuttal claims it is, why did NE indefinitely suspend them even before the NFL punishment came down?

Here is a reasonable response.

If Jast and McNally were deflating footballs for Brady, why would the Patriots risk antagonizing them?

Wouldn't ticking those two off all but drive them to an ESPN expose?
 
Expecting that the Patriots won't mind a little copy-and-paste on their side of things, and since I commented on this very issue in the thread regarding whether or not JM and JJ could/should sue the NFL, I was startled to read this bit of information:

The report acknowledges that game officials specifically allowed Mr. McNally to take the game footballs from the dressing room of the Officials’ Locker Room (where the referee was) into the separate sitting room (pg. 55). No one told Mr. McNally that he could not then proceed to the field with the footballs. When the NFC Championship Game ended abruptly in overtime and Mr. McNally started from the back of the sitting room towards the door to the hallway, he walked by numerous League officials in the sitting room. As the report states (pg. 55), the sitting room was crowded with “NFL personnel, game officials and others gathered there to watch the conclusion of the NFC Championship Game on television.” Mr. McNally had to navigate this crowd of officials to make it through the sitting room with two large bags of footballs on his shoulders. Mr. McNally, a physically big man, hoisted two large bags of footballs and lumbered past all these League officials and out the door of the Officials’ Locker Room. As is clear from the report, no one objected; no one told him to stop; no one requested that he wait to be accompanied by a League official; no one told him that a League official had to carry the footballs to the field. After he walked past all of these League officials and out the door of the Officials’ Locker Room to the hallway, he then walked past James Daniel, an NFL official and one of the people who had been alerted to the Colts psi concerns pre-game (pg. 45). Mr. Daniel, as seen on the security video, looked at Mr. McNally carrying the bags of footballs toward the field unaccompanied by any League or game official, and made no objection to Mr. McNally continuing unaccompanied to the field. In short, if officials lost track of the location of game footballs, it was not because Mr. McNally stealthily removed them. (Omitted from the investigation were interviews with all those League officials whom Mr. McNally walked past with the bags of footballs on his shoulders.) Even after halftime, when obvious attention was being paid to game footballs and psi issues by League and game officials, who took control of the footballs at halftime, the security video shows Mr. McNally, with no objection, taking the footballs from the Officials’ Locker Room back to the field totally unaccompanied by any League or Game official. Mr. McNally’s removal of the footballs from the Officials’ Locker Room before the game began was simply not unauthorized, unknown, unusual, or in violation of some protocol or instruction. The report nonetheless portrays Mr. McNally’s departure from the Officials’ Locker Room before the game as a step in secretly taking the footballs for nefarious reasons.

If you read the Wells Report from around page 48 to page 60, everything McNally did is expressed as completely unusual, almost without precedence, and the people who say it happened half the time (the tunnel security guards) are dismissed by Wells.

So let me put this bit out there one more time from the above quote:

Even after halftime, when obvious attention was being paid to game footballs and psi issues by League and game officials, who took control of the footballs at halftime, the security video shows Mr. McNally, with no objection, taking the footballs from the Officials’ Locker Room back to the field totally unaccompanied by any League or Game official.

Holy crap.
 
That's why the media doesn't matter at this point. At this point, it's all preparation for the appeal and the court case. Personally, I think this response was a bad idea, but this may have been something Kraft felt was important as some kind of "this is what happened" to the other owners.
Exactly. The main objective is to provide context, rebuttal and refute claims made in the Wells Report so to serve as an acceptable, plausible baseline for future legal action.

Swinging the media around would be a bonus.
 
FWIW the general public at least on twitter seems to not buy the pats explanation of 'deflator' word for someone losing weight and seem to be mocking patriots explanation.
Their explanation of that does seem a bit ridiculous, but who the hell knows. The texts really don't look that great for the Pats no matter how they're spun.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SVN
Here is a reasonable response.

If Jast and McNally were deflating footballs for Brady, why would the Patriots risk antagonizing them?

Wouldn't ticking those two off all but drive them to an ESPN expose?

That doesn't explain why they were suspended though. I'm assuming there's a good reason, I'm honestly just curious what it is.
 
Their whole argument rests on the assumption that the Patriots are lying. They will look terrible if they have to walk back that assumption. Better to double-down on their stupidity than admit that they were wrong.
All along they've tried to manipulate the testimony and science to support a pre conceived judgement of guilty. Thats why this took so long, they had nothing to work with.
 
Last edited:
Holy crap indeed!
 
Exactly. The main objective is to provide context, rebuttal and refute claims made in the Wells Report so to serve as an acceptable, plausible baseline for future legal action.

Swinging the media around would be a bonus.

This response won't do that, at least in regards to the texts.
 
Here is a reasonable response.

If Jast and McNally were deflating footballs for Brady, why would the Patriots risk antagonizing them?

Wouldn't ticking those two off all but drive them to an ESPN expose?
The league coerced the Pats to do it and threatened them with more sanctions if they did not.

Then Bob woke up.
 
My take is that like the Wells report, some stuff looks like it are significant points that poke big holes in the Wells report and others are questionable.

I wish they had better explanation for the Deflator and ESPN texts because that is what everyone will focus on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo on the Rich Eisen Show From 5/2/24
Patriots News And Notes 5-5, Early 53-Man Roster Projection
New Patriots WR Javon Baker: ‘You ain’t gonna outwork me’
Friday Patriots Notebook 5/3: News and Notes
Thursday Patriots Notebook 5/2: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 5/1: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo’s Appearance on WEEI On Monday
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/30: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Drake Maye’s Interview on WEEI on Jones & Mego with Arcand
MORSE: Rookie Camp Invitees and Draft Notes
Back
Top