BobDigital
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 16,350
- Reaction score
- 15,044
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.If the five people who disagreed with my post do not think that –
Richardson
C Jones (LB)
Jeffcoat
Reilly
Coyle
Coleman
Skov
Gayle
Loston
Hubbard
Murphy
Patchan
Millard
Kerr
Exum
Seastrunk
C Jones (WR)
Hazel
Halapio was a better choice than all these players in your minds?
Look at Halapio workout numbers and his college tape, then look at his injury history it was not a good pick. If you think it was that is your right, just like I am allowed to feel it was not a good pick.Draft picks and associated grades are all over the map with this draft, especially offensive linemen. Every team has made head scratching picks
I have plenty to back it up, how about the fact that he was rated as the #292 prospect in the draft, and graded out as a seventh round – UDFA prospect.
Let us be realistic here DaBruinz you have NEVER said one negative thing about any decision Belichick has made so how the heck can anything you say be taken with any objectivity. You defend everything like Belichick ****’s roses, and that destroys your creditability for me.
My assessment of our draft –
Easley – great pick
JG – good player/disliked the pick
Stork – Meh pick
White – Meh pick
Fleming – good pick
Halapio – not a good pick
Your assessment of our draft –
Easley – Best pick EVER
JG – AMAZING PICK
Stork – GREAT PICK
White – SUPER PICK
Fleming – BESTEST PICK
Halapio – BB is having a GREAT DRAFT THIS PICK RULES
Whose assessment do you think is more believable?
I actually just asked a question, which you elected not to answer. You can click the disagree button but why don’t you provide me with something that justifies your belief that Halapio was a better pick than any of these players.Great - you've taken to quoting yourself to try and prove a point that you can't legitimately prove
I think that BB must be happy with the Safeties, so I'm not worried. However the lack of LB's and TE's is really puzzling to me. 3 OLmen, WTF????????? I know we neede one, and I thought Stork was a decent pick. The OT was puzzling, and another G is positively insane, especially with such gaping needs at TE, and LB depthWe we still need a TE, LB & S i think. Only 3 picks left. I honestly think 1 is going to go completely unaddressed in the draft at this point.
Funny this is what NFL draft scout says right now. I talk out my ass and you straight up lie
Name: Jon Halapio
College: Florida Number: 67
Height: 6-4 Weight: 323
Position: OG Pos2: OT
Class/Draft Year: rSr/2014
40 Low: 5.22 40 Time: 5.29 40 High: 5.45
Projected Round: 7-FA
Name: Bryan Stork (+) Coming off Knee & Shoulder INJs
College: Florida State Number: 52
Height: 6-4 Weight: 315
Position: C Pos2: OG/OT/TE
Class/Draft Year: rSr/2014
40 Low: 5.34 40 Time: 5.45 40 High: 5.55
Projected Round: 7-FA
Almost up. Gotta think it'll be a special teamer, probably linebacker.
Would it kill them to take a potential playmaker here?
Funny this is what NFL draft scout says right now. I talk out my ass and you straight up lie
Name: Jon Halapio
College: Florida Number: 67
Height: 6-4 Weight: 323
Position: OG Pos2: OT
Class/Draft Year: rSr/2014
40 Low: 5.22 40 Time: 5.29 40 High: 5.45
Projected Round: 7-FA
Name: Bryan Stork (+) Coming off Knee & Shoulder INJs
College: Florida State Number: 52
Height: 6-4 Weight: 315
Position: C Pos2: OG/OT/TE
Class/Draft Year: rSr/2014
40 Low: 5.34 40 Time: 5.45 40 High: 5.55
Projected Round: 7-FA
I did not like the Halapio pick, I did not start watching the draft expecting to like every pick we made so it really is not any skin off my back, I am just giving my opinion that Halapio was the worst pick we have made so far.The problem you have here is NFL Draft Scout doesn't actually make picks in the NFL draft so their opinion doesn't matter. This was discusses earlier in the week in the draft forum, big boards are only a guide and can't be taken as fact for a number of reasons. First of which is those rankings aren't team based and every team ranks players differently based on their own system. That fact alone makes NFL draft scout rankings highly flawed and silly to use as facts in an argument. As much as any of the media and analysts have watched these players its not even close to the amount of time the teams have put into them. It's simply not possible for these draft services to do the same evaluation because they don't have the resources. They aren't doing the medical checks or interviewing players so how can they get an accurate ranking of players?
That's EXACTLY what it is and I've proven it yet again in this thread.Sure thing DaBruinz, that is it.
So we base draft stocks on their “high” now? Do we do that for the Jets and the rest of our opponents or is that just a homer thing?Actually, Jackass, you are the liar because you skipped over the part of the line where it says projected on NFLDraftscout.com that says:
Halapio: High:5-6th Low:PFA
Stork: High:5-6th Low:PFA
BTW, you also can't read. I said that OURLADS/LINDY's had Stork higher up. This was posted by someone else earlier in the thread.
That is par for the course with you. You think you know what you are talking about, but you don't. You never have since the day you started posting on this board. And I'm not the only one who has taken you to task for this.
Wrong. There are actually people on this board who have been coaches and have played the game. THEY have a basis for statements in certain areas.
That being said, Brady6 is talking out his arse with no facts to support him. Such as the FACT that was mentioned earlier about Stork being rated as a 3rd-5th round pick by Ourlads/Lindy's. Halapio was rated a 5th-UDFA by NFLDraftScout.com. Pats took him in the 6th and he's complaining about it..