Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree2Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2011, 10:13 PM   #1
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,322
Default Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Solder has been consistently described as somewhat raw, but with a rare frame and rare athleticism. It got me wondering...how rare, exactly?

Here's his measurable line:
6'8.25" 319 4.96/2.87/1.72 21 32" 09'02" 4.34 7.44

I set out to find past OTs within at least shouting range of those numbers. I set some cutoffs:
height > 6'6"
40 < 5.15
10 < 1.78
VJ > 30"
BJ > 8'10"
SS < 4.55
3C < 7.70

Then I went back and looked through all OTs from the 2004 draft on. Here's the complete list of players making the cut:

Sebastian Vollmer
Jared Veldheer

IOW, Solder is indeed a VERY rare physical specimen (and in pretty nice company).

In case you're curious, other players coming pretty close:
Winston Justice
Eric Winston
Robert Gallery
Ryan Clady
William Beatty
NFLroughdraft likes this.
patchick is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-24-2011, 11:49 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
Metaphors's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,662
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick View Post
Solder has been consistently described as somewhat raw, but with a rare frame and rare athleticism. It got me wondering...how rare, exactly?

Here's his measurable line:
6'8.25" 319 4.96/2.87/1.72 21 32" 09'02" 4.34 7.44

I set out to find past OTs within at least shouting range of those numbers. I set some cutoffs:
height > 6'6"
40 < 5.15
10 < 1.78
VJ > 30"
BJ > 8'10"
SS < 4.55
3C < 7.70

Then I went back and looked through all OTs from the 2004 draft on. Here's the complete list of players making the cut:

Sebastian Vollmer
Jared Veldheer

IOW, Solder is indeed a VERY rare physical specimen (and in pretty nice company).
I also believe Solder's arm length is a couple of inches longer than Vollmer or Veldheer. Not looking to resurrect the arm length discussions from other threads, but it is another asset for a LT to have in the utility belt. The only downer was his bench numbers...but moving 300 lbs horizontally is much more important than moving 225 lbs vertically.

I'm not a big Solder fan. If you are going to take a LT in the first round, they should be technically clean and dominant in at least one aspect of their game. I don't see that in Solder. I do see the skill set and recognize that he could put it all together with the right coaching. If he can turn his upside into production, he can move into the Ogden/Pace neighborhood (likely not the same cul-de-sac though).

If the Pats are right on Solder, they have bookend tackles that don't need help with their assignments, freeing up the TEs to attack downfield and the RBs (paging Mr. Vereen) to slip out of the backfield. Brady may never throw another incomplete pass. If Solder struggles, there is a good chance the Pats offense will underachieve and Brady will enter the playoffs once again feeling like a crash test dummy. Gutsy call and probably not one that I would have made. Hopefully Solder will have some preseason games to work out the rough spots before the games count.
Metaphors is offline  
Old 05-25-2011, 12:06 AM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 
jsull87's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,247
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

very interested to watch him progress... i think he'll be getting alot of help from crump and Gronk when we play the colts though.
jsull87 is offline  
Old 05-25-2011, 01:29 AM   #4
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,141
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Nate Solder's size and athleticism are intriguing to me, but he was one of the many prospects I didn't want the New England Patriots. From the tape I was able to see of him, he didn't appear to be dominate. From his size alone, I expected to see a tackle that embarrassed college defensive ends or being embarrassed by speed rushers. Surprisingly, he seemed to deal with speed rushers well enough, but again, he wasn't dominate again college opponents.

I find it ironic that Belichick will buy on upside when it comes to a offensive tackle, but generally avoid an outside linebacker with comparable upside and measureables. Not that I have an issue with it, because bust-ability seems to be lower with offensive linemen than defensive linemen/3-4 OLBs.
__________________
"It's not whether you get knocked down; it's whether you get up."Vince Lombardi


Pats fan since 1993
TealSox is offline  
Old 05-25-2011, 01:46 AM   #5
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,581
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by TealSox View Post
I find it ironic that Belichick will buy on upside when it comes to a offensive tackle, but generally avoid an outside linebacker with comparable upside and measureables. Not that I have an issue with it, because bust-ability seems to be lower with offensive linemen than defensive linemen/3-4 OLBs.
This isn't meant facetiously, but clearly the Patriots (especially Scar) really liked something about Solder. So what was it?
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is offline  
Old 05-25-2011, 02:26 AM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
borg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,007
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
This isn't meant facetiously, but clearly the Patriots (especially Scar) really liked something about Solder. So what was it?
He's not a players rep for the NFLPA
__________________
"In the end, Belichick juiced Moss like an orange, and once all the good pulp was squeezed, he tossed Moss aside. "


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
borg is offline  
Old 05-25-2011, 08:45 AM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,368
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by borg View Post
He's not a players rep for the NFLPA
For those who don't get it, he's talking about Matt Light. Has he talked his way out of town a la Mike Vrabel? I think the fact that Mankins returned despite the acrimonious contract talks proves this team is above that. Matt Light will be a football decision. Does he want too much for what he brings to the table? Especially if we have an option..Solder

I've seen the tapes of Solder. I think when he struggled it was a technique issue. Fortunately, we have one of the top 2-3 ol coaches in the league. His mistakes will be corrected. I'm not comparing the two from a performance angle. There is none yet. But, physically Solder reminds me of Tony Boselli.
patsfaninpa is online now  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:01 AM   #8
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 553
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 View Post
This isn't meant facetiously, but clearly the Patriots (especially Scar) really liked something about Solder. So what was it?
I have no idea what Teal Sox thinks but the fact that he's really fast and has really long arms means it's going to be a lot tougher for players (including blitzing defensive backs) to get around him. This was always the worst part of Light's game; the Suggs sack early in the 09 playoff game comes to mind and if I remember correctly one of the Jets dbacks got around a slowfooted light in the playoff game as well.
Shelterdog is online now  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:03 AM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 
Snake Eyes's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,373
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metaphors View Post
I also believe Solder's arm length is a couple of inches longer than Vollmer or Veldheer. Not looking to resurrect the arm length discussions from other threads, but it is another asset for a LT to have in the utility belt. The only downer was his bench numbers...but moving 300 lbs horizontally is much more important than moving 225 lbs vertically.

I'm not a big Solder fan. If you are going to take a LT in the first round, they should be technically clean and dominant in at least one aspect of their game. I don't see that in Solder. I do see the skill set and recognize that he could put it all together with the right coaching. If he can turn his upside into production, he can move into the Ogden/Pace neighborhood (likely not the same cul-de-sac though).

If the Pats are right on Solder, they have bookend tackles that don't need help with their assignments, freeing up the TEs to attack downfield and the RBs (paging Mr. Vereen) to slip out of the backfield. Brady may never throw another incomplete pass. If Solder struggles, there is a good chance the Pats offense will underachieve and Brady will enter the playoffs once again feeling like a crash test dummy. Gutsy call and probably not one that I would have made. Hopefully Solder will have some preseason games to work out the rough spots before the games count.
While I’m not a Solder fan yet I’m actually not going to hold the bench press numbers against him, when getting into that rep range it starts to become more about endurance than short term explosiveness, which is what players need (5 seconds of mixing it up with a D-lineman and then a relatively long rest). That being said, only an idiot would be trying to move a D-lineman primarily using arm/upper body strength, the lion’s share of the work will be done with the lower body, having the grace and coordination of a dancer is going to do a lot more to prevent sacks than having the strength of a World’s strongest man contestant.
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Snake Eyes is offline  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:08 AM   #10
Moderatrix
 
patchick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 10,322
Default Re: Nate Solder physical comps, fwiw

Quote:
Originally Posted by TealSox View Post
I find it ironic that Belichick will buy on upside when it comes to a offensive tackle, but generally avoid an outside linebacker with comparable upside and measureables.
It's definitely intriguing, isn't it? I wonder whether they put high-round OL choices largely in Dante's hands: "he's yours to mold, you pick him and be responsible for the outcome." Along the same lines, Solder & Vollmer (and Cannon, for that matter) were reported to be intelligent guys and posted high Wonderlic scores. That seems to be another key point in trusting that a prospect can rise through L'Accademia Dante.

Now turning around and looking at OLB prospects: who are the Solder-like über-rare bodies they've actually passed on? Let me try a set of target measurables based on DeMarcus Ware similar to my Solder cutoffs:

height > 6'3"
weight > 245
40 > 4.70
10 < 1.68
VJ > 36"
SS <4.20
3C < 7.00

And I'll add the requirement "the Pats had a realistic shot to get him, even if it took a moderate trade up." (E.g. Von Miller makes the cutoff, but we clearly can't accuse the Patriots of passing on him.)

It turns out there's only been ONE player since Ware who fills the bill. Which leads me to 2 conclusions:

1. We can't really say that the Pats keep passing on the OLB equivalents of Solder and Vollmer;
2. There's a reason so many of us obsessed over Connor Barwin.
patchick is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Welcome to New England: Nate Solder PatsFans.com Article PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 05-10-2011 08:40 AM
Nate Solder Off The Grid Patriots Draft Talk 98 04-29-2011 01:09 PM
A Nate Solder Video!! KDPPatsfan85 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 4 04-29-2011 12:53 PM
Nate Solder - OT - Colorado DaBruinz Patriots Draft Talk 5 11-23-2010 02:55 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC