03-25-2009, 10:12 AM
|
#24
|
|
PatsFans.com Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
|
Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
1) I believe that Laurinitis has the best chance at doing well at ILB in 2009 (and likely beyond). I do not advocate him because he is safe.
2) I do not believe that belichick needs to play safe with our first round. Personally, other than the fact that the contract is a year longer, I'm just as happy finding a top player (probably more happy) hitting with a second or third rounder. Why wouldn't be happy if we drafted future pro-bowlers Wood, Vaughn, and Brinkley, even we busted on our #23 and #34. It is important to find future starters, and pro-bowlers. It is NOT important that we find them on the first round. The first round has been critical because there are usually few other opportunties to get top players. In any draft, it is more likely on a prospective basis to find a starter in the first round than in later rounds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzPatsFan
I beleive the day of the TJ runstuffer ILB is dead and gone. You need blitzing, and pass coverage as wel as overall size and tackling ability in an ILB these days. Sintim or Lauranitis and I still like Lauranitis because BB always wants to hit with his First Rounders. He experiments with other picks. Lauranitis is a safe, First Round value pick, at a spot of need.
Despite his naysayers here.
|
|
|
|