Can we talk WR for a bit? - Page 9 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree121Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2013, 03:49 PM   #81
On the Roster
 
rabidfireweasel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 79
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot Missile View Post
Sorry Ken, can't agree. My expectations are and should be high. Impact rookie wrs are seldom but they do happen. Boldin,T Glenn,Colston to name a few. Draft the right one and have him play with one of the best QBs of all time and you never know what will happen

If it doesn't happen then atleast they tried. I still don't fault BB for C Jackson. He killed the hands drills and had a good combine. It's time to try again imo. Expectations will be high but I'm mature enough to know the risks involved with that position.
Your expections aren't high, they are close to absurd. You put out 3 names who had the 3 of the top 6 strongest rookie seasons in the last 20 years (Randy Moss, Michael Clayton and AJ Green probably fill out the list) and make that your baseline for expectations. This, on a team with two- three established pass catchers. Basically, out of the hundreds of wr's drafted in the last 20 years, and with little history of drafting a good one, you expect the patriots to draft a rookie- at a pick in the 20's, who performs in the 5% historically. The question in, why?

Consider that Calvin Johnson only had 756 and 4 as a rookie. Larry Fitzgerald wasn't much better. Andre Johnson didn't get 1000 yards. Julio jones was a clear stud as a rookie and didn't get a thousand yards. Michael Crabtree just figured things out this year.
rabidfireweasel is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 02-11-2013, 03:55 PM   #82
On the Roster
 
rabidfireweasel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 79
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsinthesnow View Post
Is an impact like Josh Gordon too much to ask?

50 receptions 805 yards 5 TDs 16.1ypc
I would say that if the team still has a healthy Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd and Vereen, than yes, that looks like an unreasonable expectation to me.
I think any rookie getting more than 700 yards would be surprising unless one or more of the primary weapons gets hurt.

805 and 5 is a monster rookie wr year, even if the team has no other weapons and a QB who locks onto a primary read.
rabidfireweasel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 04:10 PM   #83
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,673
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabidfireweasel View Post
I would say that if the team still has a healthy Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd and Vereen, than yes, that looks like an unreasonable expectation to me.
I think any rookie getting more than 700 yards would be surprising unless one or more of the primary weapons gets hurt.

805 and 5 is a monster rookie wr year, even if the team has no other weapons and a QB who locks onto a primary read.
Kendall Wright had 626 yards with Jake Locker and Hasselbeck throwing to him.

Justin Blackmon had 865 yards with Blaine Gabbert and Chad Henne dealing the ball.

Patriot fans are way too defeatist on this WR draftee thing. We have the best QB ever throwing the ball. If the WR's are getting on the field, then they should be putting up similar numbers.

Let's just say that Bedard and Reiss are right and that neither Lloyd and Welker are back. There's potentially 2300 yards of receptions up for grabs. Why can't a rookie get Blackmon/Gordon type numbers?
captain stone likes this.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 04:32 PM   #84
On the Roster
 
rabidfireweasel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 79
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
Kendall Wright had 626 yards with Jake Locker and Hasselbeck throwing to him.

Justin Blackmon had 865 yards with Blaine Gabbert and Chad Henne dealing the ball.

Patriot fans are way too defeatist on this WR draftee thing. We have the best QB ever throwing the ball. If the WR's are getting on the field, then they should be putting up similar numbers.

Let's just say that Bedard and Reiss are right and that neither Lloyd and Welker are back. There's potentially 2300 yards of receptions up for grabs. Why can't a rookie get Blackmon/Gordon type numbers?
I would say that it is very possible if Lloyd and Welker both leave. However, I don't see it as 2300 yards available, unless Gronk or Hernandez get hurt. They missed a lot of games last year.

I think you are one of the best minds on the board Manx, but you are comparing apples and oranges. Justin Blackmon in the best wr on his team, and Chad Henne can accumulate yardage. I would also say that Kendall Wright is the best wr on his team. Unless a QB is truly awful, a mediocre QB can put up big numbers with a quality wr, especially if that guy is the receiving threat on the team. Jeff Blake, Aaron Brooks, David Carr, Jay Cutler, Matt Moore and Andy Dalton all say " Hi".

The problem I see in terms of the rookie wr, and I mean this in terms of statistical impact- not game impact- is that I don't see the rookie gaining enough trust to get enough targets in year 1 if Lloyd, Gronk and Hernandez stays.
I think Markus Wheaton could step right in and produce 850 and 6 if both wrs leave. If one stays, I think he is more slowly acclimated to the offense. I think if the guy is a newer fit ( a big strong guy) I definitely think there will be an adjustment period. A true playmaker would change the offense, but his value might not register when ranking rookies by statistics.

I hope NE drafts a wr or two. I just think that they system they run is very tough on rookies, especially given that there is talent ( although it is mostly TE and RB talent) to catch the ball. I have much higher hopes and expectations in year 2.
rabidfireweasel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 04:42 PM   #85
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,673
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabidfireweasel View Post
I would say that it is very possible if Lloyd and Welker both leave. However, I don't see it as 2300 yards available, unless Gronk or Hernandez get hurt. They missed a lot of games last year.

I think you are one of the best minds on the board Manx, but you are comparing apples and oranges. Justin Blackmon in the best wr on his team, and Chad Henne can accumulate yardage. I would also say that Kendall Wright is the best wr on his team. Unless a QB is truly awful, a mediocre QB can put up big numbers with a quality wr, especially if that guy is the receiving threat on the team. Jeff Blake, Aaron Brooks, David Carr, Jay Cutler, Matt Moore and Andy Dalton all say " Hi".

The problem I see in terms of the rookie wr, and I mean this in terms of statistical impact- not game impact- is that I don't see the rookie gaining enough trust to get enough targets in year 1 if Lloyd, Gronk and Hernandez stays.
I think Markus Wheaton could step right in and produce 850 and 6 if both wrs leave. If one stays, I think he is more slowly acclimated to the offense. I think if the guy is a newer fit ( a big strong guy) I definitely think there will be an adjustment period. A true playmaker would change the offense, but his value might not register when ranking rookies by statistics.

I hope NE drafts a wr or two. I just think that they system they run is very tough on rookies, especially given that there is talent ( although it is mostly TE and RB talent) to catch the ball. I have much higher hopes and expectations in year 2.
To be honest, I largely agree with you. And to be frank, I really don't care how productive they are for the first year anyway. We're drafting them, hopefully for a decade. I hate drafting for a one year need and I absolutely hate this idea of selling out for Brady's final years that has become so pervasive on the main board. I'm actually more concerned about the post Brady years than I am his final few and we should be drafting with that in mind.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 05:06 PM   #86
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 346
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

i really think we should sign one WR and draft 1 preferably signing Hartline and drafting Patton in the 2nd
EwanSellars is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 08:41 PM   #87
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,850
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabidfireweasel View Post
Your expections aren't high, they are close to absurd. You put out 3 names who had the 3 of the top 6 strongest rookie seasons in the last 20 years (Randy Moss, Michael Clayton and AJ Green probably fill out the list) and make that your baseline for expectations. This, on a team with two- three established pass catchers. Basically, out of the hundreds of wr's drafted in the last 20 years, and with little history of drafting a good one, you expect the patriots to draft a rookie- at a pick in the 20's, who performs in the 5% historically. The question in, why?

Consider that Calvin Johnson only had 756 and 4 as a rookie. Larry Fitzgerald wasn't much better. Andre Johnson didn't get 1000 yards. Julio jones was a clear stud as a rookie and didn't get a thousand yards. Michael Crabtree just figured things out this year.
So what? Believe me,I'm well grounded when it comes to this team. Just because I throw a few names out there doesn't mean it's gonna happen. If the player drafted can stretch the field horizontally and vertically, help the team win games while making the other players successfull while being a threat himself. Isnt that great? Doesn't mean he has to catch a 100 balls, receive a 1000 yards or make incredible Moss catches.

There's always a chance a draftee just gets it right away and performs well. Theres a greater probability of that with this QB and offense. Maybe I should just lower my expectations to mediocre? That's absurd to me.
Patriot Missile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 11:59 PM   #88
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,673
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Just been rewatching Robert Woods. Very impressive. As much as I like Wheaton and Patton, I do think Woods and Hopkins are a step up. Certainly first round worthy.

We would be stupid not to use this draft to reboot our WR position. There is just too much talent.
captain stone and chevss454 like this.
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 02:54 AM   #89
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 161
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by manxman2601 View Post
Just been rewatching Robert Woods. Very impressive. As much as I like Wheaton and Patton, I do think Woods and Hopkins are a step up. Certainly first round worthy.

We would be stupid not to use this draft to reboot our WR position. There is just too much talent.
Hurrah!!

Finally someone else sees what I see in Woods. I think there's been too much focus on 2012 when evaluating Woods, when he wasn't healthy. As I keep mentioning I think he's the most gifted of the WR's in a very stacked draft class
Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 11:22 AM   #90
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,673
Default Re: Can we talk WR for a bit?

This is one for the Justin Hunter fans. The number of "clutch" receptions by 10 college receivers. Not sure how much it tells us but interesting all the same.





https://twitter.com/JPSTATS/status/3...881088/photo/1
manxman2601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC