ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I'm with Deus. This wouldn't normally interest me too much, but the inevitable availability of Cassel makes this awfully intriguing.
To me, that's the major X-factor, along with a couple of other considerations. IF Cassel is available, IF it looks like Brady is going to play beyond his 2014 contract, and IF someone wants to make a decent offer for Mallett, then the time to move Mallett could be sooner rather than later. All very big "ifs", but possible.
Factors that might favor a team making an offer for Mallett:
- The draft sucks for QBs this year
- There's a dearth of good FA talent
- A lot of teams are desperate
I wonder whether a conditional deal might be doable. Something like a 2013 3rd plus a 2014 3rd which is upgradeable based on performance. Just a thought.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "OVER Loading at ANY position can create a Fatal Advantage. THAT is what interests ME. Attacking With Concentrated Force. THAT is what WINS. In the words ~ more or less ~ of General Patton: 'I'm fighting a WAR, here. Let the B*****ES worry about their FLANKS.' " - Off the Grid
"The key to any successful organization is to anticipate things, not react to them." - Michael Lombardi
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
The idea has merit. Tebow and Cassel should be available next year, so QBs that have worked with McDaniels could be brought in.
Cassel yes, Tebow no. Is there another word even more direct than no? I'll take that word.
I'm from the school of don't fix it if it ain't broke so I see no value in trading Mallet unless somebody is idiotic enough to fork over the unthinkable value.
I don't understand the thought process posters are having that Mallett is going to be worth a draft pick of significance. There is no body of work.
I suspect people are still in love with his college work or his combine workout (which I have no idea of his combine #'s). This guy could likely be Tom's successor, sure. He could also be Giovanni Carmazzi. We have no idea, and trying to put a high value on that unknown seems highly unlikely from my seat.
- How much of an NFL body of work do college players have?
- Do NFL teams base their draft decisions on a players college work and/or combine workouts?
__________________
"The secret of steel has always carried with it a mystery, you must learn it's riddle, Conan, you must learn its discipline, for no one in this world can you trust, not men, not women, not beasts...this you can trust"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by Snake Eyes; 12-18-2012 at 01:55 PM..
I wonder if Cassel is ruined / figured out by the league
2008 was a perfect storm. No opponents had a clue about what he could do. We had the easiest schedule we have had in any year I can remember. We had some fairly remarkable (i.e. fortunate) wins against middling teams to go 11-5, losing to every good team. We had tons of talent back from an 18-1 team.
I don't think that Cassel, even under McDaniel, would be a capable QB if he had to play. I'd prefer Mallett, though it's more of an unknown.
I wonder if Cassel is ruined / figured out by the league
2008 was a perfect storm. No opponents had a clue about what he could do. We had the easiest schedule we have had in any year I can remember. We had some fairly remarkable (i.e. fortunate) wins against middling teams to go 11-5, losing to every good team. We had tons of talent back from an 18-1 team.
I don't think that Cassel, even under McDaniel, would be a capable QB if he had to play. I'd prefer Mallett, though it's more of an unknown.
Well he was actually better statistically in 2010 with the Chiefs than he was in 2008 with the Pats.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Doesn't make sense to me. You only trade Mallett when you can get more than you gave up for him, and I don't see anyone coughing up a 2nd when he hasn't done anything to show he can play in this league. If a team gets a woody for him and offers a second then by all means consider it, otherwise don't create a hole when you don't need to. Stick with him until a good offer comes along.
Cassel yes, Tebow no. Is there another word even more direct than no? I'll take that word.
I'm from the school of don't fix it if it ain't broke so I see no value in trading Mallet unless somebody is idiotic enough to fork over the unthinkable value.
As players like RG3 and Wilson (and Newton last year) have shown, you can win without playing an "NFL" offense, and Tebow won last year. The virulent anti-Tebow stuff is ridiculous, particularly because he could be brought in as the #3 behind Cassel, and because it would be done only if BB and McDaniels were both fully on board with the idea. It makes pretty much anyone who rails against Tebow worthless to listen to.
And I'm not sure what you think there is about Mallet that "ain't broke", since you've never seen him do anything in games that count.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius
And then in 2011 and 2012 he is practically at he level of Mark Sanchez, or (somehow?) even worse!
no confidence? arm shot? beat up too much? I don't see him play enough to know what has gone so horribly wrong so fast, and how much of it is fixable.
David Carr syndrome. He might be fixable, he might be totally finished.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius