Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
HOME | MIGUEL'S PAGES | IAN'S BLOG | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
 Great Fan Podcasts: PatsCast | Patriots 4th & 2Support PatsFans.com and receive a free gift from the ProShop - Learn More
Right Now At PatsFans.com: - HOME
Welker Signs Franchise Tender
Welker signed his franchise tender on Tuesday.

  • Weds Patriots Links: 5/16
  • Pats Add Another Belichick, Finalize Coaching Staff
  • Early 53 Man Projections
  •  
     
    Twitter | Facebook  
     Recent New England Patriots Online Media Headlines:
    Logan Mankins at No. 64 on NFL Network’s ‘Top 100′ list
    Source: WEEI - May 16th, 2012
    Mankins ranks 64th in player poll
    Source: ESPN Boston - May 16th, 2012
    Source: Ebert signs 4-year deal
    Source: ESPN Boston - May 16th, 2012
    Source: Pats agree to terms with seventh-round pick Jeremy Ebert
    Source: Boston Herald - May 16th, 2012
     
     
    Analysis on Jones
    A Big defensive End

    BIO: Chandler Jones

    GEORGE: Pats Finally Trade Up
     
     

    Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
    Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
    Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

    WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
    ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

    Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

    Like Tree2Likes

    Closed Thread
     
    Thread Tools Display Modes
    Old 02-08-2012, 09:27 AM   #1
    SVN
    All Pro Poster
     

    Join Date: Sep 2005
    Posts: 17,008

    Posting Frequency
    Default Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point
    SVN is offline  
    FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
    DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
    RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

    Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
    Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
    including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

    NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

    Updated 07/08/11

    Help Us Reach Our Goal!

    Old 02-08-2012, 09:40 AM   #2
    Practice Squad
     
    ThatllMoveTheChains!!!'s Avatar
     

    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 184

    Posting Frequency
    My Mood: Confused
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    Good article. People who are down on this team are out to lunch. It's a good team that's likely to get better in the coming years. They're a likeable group that seem to give 100% and are accountable. It was a hearbreaking loss, but it's refreshing to not see any finger pointing, except at themselves, from the players. This most likely isn't the end, but the beginning.
    ThatllMoveTheChains!!! is offline  
    Old 02-08-2012, 09:59 AM   #3
    Third String But Playing on Special Teams
     

    Join Date: Feb 2006
    Posts: 681

    Posting Frequency
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SVN View Post
    Thanks, I needed that. I'm so ******* sick of the whining and blame game it was a pleasure to read a fairly good piece on the game.
    __________________

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    The Boston Patriot is offline  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:09 AM   #4
    Banned by Jets Fans Everywhere
    In the Starting Line-up
     

    Join Date: Jun 2010
    Posts: 3,257

    Posting Frequency
    My Mood: Amused
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    its just another angle.......the deep throw to gronk was no different than the one to slater against the ravens....brady simply needs to put too much air under it to get it there. he needs to reconsider trying that throw.


    but at the end of the day, you either win or you lose. and if the late fumble went the pats way, curran would be writing about the plays that worked for the pats and completely dismissed the ones that cost them

    they're all mediots.....people should not be blinded by the fact that they are hearing what they want to hear
    __________________
    “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
    —Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
    IllegalContact is online now  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:22 AM   #5
    Third String But Playing on Special Teams
     

    Join Date: Dec 2011
    Posts: 722

    Posting Frequency
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    You can tell already that this team is set up to be successful/hated for the rest of Brady's career and maybe even the start of our next QB & HCs career. When you subtract out our free agents the average age of this team is surprisingly low. And most of our FAs were old guys on 1 year deals.
    VrabelJr is offline  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:22 AM   #6
    All Pro Poster
     

    Join Date: Nov 2005
    Posts: 10,964

    Posting Frequency
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IllegalContact View Post
    its just another angle.......the deep throw to gronk was no different than the one to slater against the ravens....brady simply needs to put too much air under it to get it there. he needs to reconsider trying that throw.


    but at the end of the day, you either win or you lose. and if the late fumble went the pats way, curran would be writing about the plays that worked for the pats and completely dismissed the ones that cost them

    they're all mediots.....people should not be blinded by the fact that they are hearing what they want to hear
    No matter how many times it's point out to you you'll ignore that Brady had a defender in his face and didn't get what he could on the ball. He tried to, but he failed because the guy was right there.
    SaCaCh likes this.
    upstater1 is offline  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:33 AM   #7
    PatsFans.com Supporter
     
    MoLewisrocks's Avatar
     

    Join Date: Mar 2005
    Posts: 17,166

    Posting Frequency
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    That was the return of the pre dragon Curran. Hope he sticks around, at least in print.

    Perspective is a marvelous thing the bottom liners are totally devoid of. It makes their irrelevant, but as Curran notes they aren't cabable of grasping that, either.

    Great analogy with the amatuer drunks, too.
    MoLewisrocks is offline  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:36 AM   #8
    Banned by Jets Fans Everywhere
    In the Starting Line-up
     

    Join Date: Jun 2010
    Posts: 3,257

    Posting Frequency
    My Mood: Amused
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by upstater1 View Post
    No matter how many times it's point out to you you'll ignore that Brady had a defender in his face and didn't get what he could on the ball. He tried to, but he failed because the guy was right there.
    I understand, but he had noone in his face on the throw to slater and that play suffered from the same trajectory issues. you could say the guy was right there, but the ball went exactly the same way as when someone wasn't. so you could argue that even though the guys was there, the throw was not affected. that is possible.

    there were no such issues with the dump offs to woodhead.......they could have run that play 30 times, the giants gave that up and never bothered to adjust because they felt that eventually brady would follow his tendencies.

    they went away from a few things that worked recently.......like running henrandez from the RB spot.....like trying the quick outs to the TE's....it's like the front page of their playbook went missing. they completely went away from the things that really started to work late in the season.

    even ocho earned another look.....good throw, good catch.......worth another try later no? only 9 plays of no huddle?
    __________________
    “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
    —Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.

    Last edited by IllegalContact; 02-08-2012 at 10:37 AM..
    IllegalContact is online now  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:38 AM   #9
    Third String But Playing on Special Teams
     

    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Posts: 512

    Posting Frequency
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    excellent article! I was thinking all the same things. He is the first to mention Mayo.
    Gronkandez is offline  
    Old 02-08-2012, 10:44 AM   #10
    Practice Squad
     
    ThatllMoveTheChains!!!'s Avatar
     

    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 184

    Posting Frequency
    My Mood: Confused
    Default Re: Curran: 'Bottom liners' completely miss the point

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by IllegalContact View Post
    I understand, but he had noone in his face on the throw to slater and that play suffered from the same trajectory issues. you could say the guy was right there, but the ball went exactly the same way as when someone wasn't. so you could argue that even though the guys was there, the throw was not affected. that is possible.

    there were no such issues with the dump offs to woodhead.......they could have run that play 30 times, the giants gave that up and never bothered to adjust because they felt that eventually brady would follow his tendencies.

    they went away from a few things that worked recently.......like running henrandez from the RB spot.....like trying the quick outs to the TE's....it's like the front page of their playbook went missing. they completely went away from the things that really started to work late in the season.

    even ocho earned another look.....good throw, good catch.......worth another try later no? only 9 plays of no huddle?
    I could understand the plays if they occurred earlier, the Gronk one was borderline, but going away from the high percentage plays late in the game doesn't make sense.
    ThatllMoveTheChains!!! is offline  
    Closed Thread

    Bookmarks

    Sponsored Links



    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off


    Similar Threads
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Curran: Brady's dismay is impossible to miss SVN PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 55 08-01-2010 04:19 PM
    Hector Longo completely misses the point on Cassel ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 10 10-27-2008 11:57 AM
    Don Banks is predicting Brady will miss 1-3 games at some point this season Rob0729 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 27 09-09-2008 03:18 PM



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
    Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
    Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

    © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is Part of the USA Today Sports Media Group.
    The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com, USA Today, or our staff.
    We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

    This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530