GB vs NE Defensively - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree21Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2011, 03:58 PM   #1
Woohoo, I'm a VIP!!!
 
mgcolby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Redskin Country
Posts: 5,178
Default GB vs NE Defensively

On the way into work this morning I heard a national analyst talking about every fanboy's favorite subject...power rankings!

He asked how the Pats could be in the Top 5 with that putrid defense and that some power rankings had them as high as #2 behind the Packers. His next statement is what got me thinking and ultimately led to this thread.

He stated that Green Bay is clearly #1 and then went on to list several other teams in order; before returning his attention back to the Pats, once again putting the low ranking on the Pats defensive play.

Now, I don't particularly give two ****s about power rankings. But I do know that most people consider Green Bay to be the best team in the league, which is well deserved coming off a Super Bowl win and opening the season 7-0.

But, I have watched everyone of Green Bay's games, and without stats to prove it, I didn't think the Packers defense was any better than ours. I thought everything that is said about the Pats defense could easily be said about the Packers defense (can't get off the field on 3rd down, terrible against the pass, decent against the run, hold teams to FG's in the red zone etc...).

So, I decided to go through the stats just to see if my observations were accurate. Come to find out, I couldn't have been closer to the truth....

Because of the formatting here is how to read the info below:

1. I listed the team's defensive averages and league rankings at the top
2. Then I listed each teams opponents offensive ranking in four categories (total passing, total rushing, Total offense and Points Per Game scored)
3. Then I listed each opponents offensive average for the season in parenthesis followed by the total season average of the opponents and where that average would rank league wide.
4. Opponent record for each team (includes games played against GB and NE)

Here is the raw data:

Green Bay
Passing: 290 (31st)
Rushing: 102 (10th)
Total: 391 (28th)
3rd down: 43% (22nd)
PPG 20 (9th)

NO : Pass: 1st Rush: 11th Total: 2nd PPG: 2nd
CAR: Pass: 5th Rush: 7th Total: 5th PPG: 14th
CHI: Pass: 17th Rush: 15th Total: 16th PPG: 13th
DEN: Pass: 30th Rush: 8th Total: 27th PPG: 23rd
ATL: Pass: 18th Rush: 17th Total: 17th PPG: 17th
STL: Pass: 26th Rush: 20th Total: 28th PPG: 31st
MIN: Pass: 29th Rush: 3rd Total: 18th PPG: 20th

(Opp season Averages) (Total Avg/would be league rank)
PPG (32.5;23.4;24.3;19;22.6;12.4;21.5) (22.2 / 19th)
Total (441.1;415.1;421;305.4;335;304.3;332.6) (364.9 / 13th)
Rush (117.4;129.6;114.7;125.9;112.7;105.9;150.4) (122.3 / 10th)
Pass (326.8;285.5;222.7;179.6;222.3;198.4;182.2) (202.5 / 24th)
Opp Record: 20-32

New England
Passing: 323 (32nd)
Rushing: 101 (9th)
Total: 424 (32nd)
3rd down: 46% (30th)
PPG: 23 (17th)

MIA: Pass: 25th Rush: 12th Total: 21st PPG: 28th
SD : Pass: 6th Rush: 13th Total: 6th PPG: 15th
BUF: Pass: 13th Rush: 5th Total: 10th PPG: 3rd
OAK: Pass: 23rd Rush: 2nd Total: 12th PPG: 16th
NYJ: Pass: 22nd Rush: 28th Total: 29th PPG: 11th
DAL: Pass: 7th Rush: 15th Total: 8th PPG: 18th
PIT: Pass: 8th Rush: 14th Total: 9th PPG: 19th

(Opp season Averages) (Total Avg/would be league rank)
PPG (15.3; 23; 30.1; 22.9; 24.6; 22.3; 22) (22.8 17th)
Total (318.9; 399.4;380.1;365.6;300.1; 394.3;388.8) (363.9 13th)
Rush (116.9; 116; 140.6; 159.3;92.4;114.7; 115.4) (122.1 10th)
Pass (202;283.4;239.6;206.3;207.7;279.6;273.4) (241.7 12th)
Opp Record: 26-24

My point here for those wondering, is that the "best team in the league" has the exact same flaw that we have. Every team in the league is hurting somewhere. The Eagles O-line is garbage, LB's suck. The Ravens have Flacco and a mind numbing reluctance to run the football. The Steelers O-line leaves a lot to be desired and have LB's dropping like flies due to injury, not mention Big Ben's love affair with turnovers in big games. The Packers defense is a liability. New England's Defense is a liability. I could go on.

I have stayed away from posting this week because this place becomes unbearable after a loss. From garbage like "Maybe Bill Walsh was right" and other threads, one would think this was a 2-5 team coming off a loss to the Rams at home.

We lost to the defending AFC champions on the road by 8 points, playing the worst football we have played all season. The putrid defense held the Steelers to 6 points in the second half. The offense struggled to adjust to the surprising man pressure etc.... it was one loss get over it.

I think far to many people only watch the Pats play on Sunday, then watch highlights on ESPN of the other games. And then listen to uninformed opinions from the talking heads, like my example above.

Maybe they even go as far as comparing these Pats with Patriot teams of the early 2000's; which were one of the most efficient, and well disciplined football teams to ever step on to a football field. Then come to the conclusion that this team isn't good enough to win it all.

The only thing that is relevant now, is how they stack up against the other 31 teams in the league this year. And coming from someone that watches every game, every week, this team stacks up really well!
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait....
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mgcolby is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-04-2011, 04:34 PM   #2
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 
JJDChE's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,821
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

I'll just put this right here...

The last 4 games we're allowing our opponents 2.7ppg less than their season average.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by JJDChE; 11-04-2011 at 04:35 PM..
JJDChE is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 04:53 PM   #3
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

I think it's a lot of fans blindly following whatever the media tells them, and right now the Packers are flavor of the month. My guess is that once the Packers lose a game or two the tide will quickly turn and some of these very same analysts that are hyping them today will label them as overrated tomorrow.

I haven't seen every game like you have but from the games of theirs that I have seen I had the same identical impression. Thanks for taking the time to pull those stats together.
Ron Sellers is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:02 PM   #4
On The Game Day Roster
 
LasVegasPatsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 327
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

Winning masks problems and loosing exposes them. That's media for you.
LasVegasPatsFan is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:08 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
randomk1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,604
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

Packers have lost Collins and Cullen Jenkins...those guys were big pieces in that last years D.

They are still better than our D though.
__________________
Three out of Four. Back-to-back.
randomk1 is online now  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:18 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
Sivy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 2,905
My Mood: Cheerful
Send a message via AIM to Sivy
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

Packers have played crap teams..I love how people just ignore these things
__________________
"The people who are claiming that the Pats are dead are the same ones who would go up and check if Jason Voorhees is "really" dead by leaning over his body." -Someone at jetnation.
Sivy is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:22 PM   #7
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Sciz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,913
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sivy View Post
Packers have played crap teams..I love how people just ignore these things
This is off-topic, but related to this. People are talking about Rodgers as a legitimate candidate to set the passer rating record. What they don't realize is that he hasn't faced a top-half passer rating defense yet, and he won't until he plays the Lions.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
Sciz is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:59 PM   #8
Woohoo, I'm a VIP!!!
 
mgcolby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Redskin Country
Posts: 5,178
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

Quote:
Originally Posted by randomk1 View Post
Packers have lost Collins and Cullen Jenkins...those guys were big pieces in that last years D.

They are still better than our D though.
Based on what? The stats tell you they are nearly identical against similarly ranked offenses. Actually, the Packers defense is ranked 31st in the league in passing against an opponent average passing yardage per game that would rank 24th in the league. The Pats opponents on the other hand would rank 12th.

So once again please explain what makes GB's defense better?
__________________
Hey, Bill you're wasting Brady's prime years......oh wait....
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mgcolby is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 06:55 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,938
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

stating that the packers are 31st and the patriots 32nd and acting like theyre sooo close isnt telling the true story. the patriots allow almost 40 more passing yards per game than the packers, have fewer turnovers, and the packers have a passer rating against of 70 versus the patriots' 92
primetime is offline  
Old 11-04-2011, 08:18 PM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: connecticut
Posts: 3,320
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: GB vs NE Defensively

i wont get into how much more talented the Packers are at DB cause i really Dont care cause come playoff time the Packers have to face the Giants Saints and 49ers to get to the SB not the Ravens Jets steelers and the up and comeing Texans who have Arian Foster Andre Johnson Matt Schaub and a top 5 defense,

out of the NFC playoff teams right now only the 49ers have a top 10 defense every AFC playoff team other then the Bills has a top 10 defense and they pitched a shut-out last week, what does that mean ? no team in the NFC will hold the Packers under 25 points maybe the 49ers but they Dont have the passing game to beat the packers... the pats have not beat a team with a winning record this year when scoreing under 25 points and every team in the AFC has the talent to hold the pats under 25 and they all have the passing game to light up this defense
BlitzFritz likes this.
patsfan-1982 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On obvious passing downs (defensively)... cloud34 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 12-06-2009 09:42 PM
So whom do we focus on defensively? dryheat44 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 20 10-02-2005 04:13 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC