ice

I missed most of it, and what i heard was nothing new, except when Gerry asked him how the patriots felt about the apoligy in the Hearld. Johnathan explained that they appreciated the retraction.

Then Gerry followed up with does that mean that the patriots were not going threw with a lawsuit against the Hearld?

In which Jonthan simply restated that they appreciated the hearlds apoligly and the retraction.

Which seems to imply that a lawsuit may still be coming

Sean Pa Patriot

The Day before the biggest game in franchise history, the team had to spend time on a issuie that was non existient..

Now The Pats did not play the best game the next day as we know,and Giants were the better team that day..

But that is time taken away from game prep, talkin to leauge officals over this nonsense...

I think that has the Pats ticked the most, because of the lost revenue over such 19-0 items.. its crazy..

I think its best in all parties that this goes away, after Tomose does his mea culpa...

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



We going to take it one game at a time

bakes781

I don't think they have any other choice but to go after the Herald. Jonathan said that they were notified by the Herald of the story Friday night & the Herald only gave them an hour to respond. The Patriot's response was the threat of legal action, so how can they choose to renege on that promise?

shmessy

I began to feel a bit that way also after reading Tomase's blurb about what is coming Friday.


.........then I learned about his Tuesday afternoon blog report that was taken down in 58 minutes.

........then Tony Masserotti wrote a "column" this morning.

....... then the Herald puts in bold lettering on the front page today "Not So Fast, Pats" with a headshot of Specter.

Goodwill towards the Herald management from anything Tomase writes tomorrow????? Gone with the wind.

__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com

BSR

What blog report?

shmessy

http://www.patriotsdaily.com/
by Scott Benson

"When you are explaining, as clearly as you can, where the story went wrong, can you also explain the story that you wrote just yesterday, which was posted to the Herald website sometime in the late afternoon?

You know the story I’m talking about, John. The one that told readers - in the headline, and in the first paragraph - that Walsh had admitted in his meeting with the Commissioner to spying on the Rams at the walkthrough. That was your lede, and that was the word you used - spying. A conclusion - unless you’ve been talking to your sources again - you couldn’t possibly have reached on the evidence that was presented to anyone who cared enough to listen and watch.....

.....I’d love to link you to the story, John, but it got misplaced, I guess, and replaced [Shmessy edit: with 58 minutes] with a generally benign piece bedecked with a ‘Case Closed’ header."

__________________
"They (Patriots) may be the greatest team ever" - Chris Mortenson, January 18, 2005 on espn.com

BSR

What a piece of work they are over there. Time to shut the doors on that place.

pats1

Great interview. Bump this thread.

http://audio.weei.com/m/19888694/jon...htm?pageid=966

SoCal Pmen

I didn't think the Herald sent out a retraction. Just an apology. There is a difference.

Willie Andrews23

But how can you apologize and then allow MAZZ's column to come out today? Either this paper has lost it's mind or they are all unprofessional fools. Probably both.