thenepatsrule

Not sure if this has been posted already

1)Fitzpatrick, Ryan
2)Rodgers, Aaron
3)Stafford, Matthew
-
-
-
-
-26) Sanchez, Mark
-

i for one dont think this is an accurate reading of the QB's performance......

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.





To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

patchick

Hmm. Looks like they're definitely undercounting YPA, but I like the weight given to TDs vs. turnovers.

Shockt327

Huh?

Aside from strength of schedule argument (Fitzpatrick vs KC) that seems pretty acurate.

Sanchez in particular -- who, I'm guessing you think should be ranked higher -- almost blew it in the 4th Q...then almost blew it again...then almost blew it once more. In the 4th he had an INT, a Fumble, and went 3-n-out on two drives where a FG was needed ti seal the deal.

His game was eerily identical to Romo's; who is now getting crucified. If not for a Punt block, then Sanchez would be too. Both were garbage when it mattered most. I'm guessing QBR takes that into account.

MoLewisrocks

Any metric that ranks Romo 11 must still have some major bugs in it... I think their clutch index needs adjustment...

MoLewisrocks

I have less trouble with Sanchize at 26 than Romo at 11. As for the blocked punt, I believe Romo also had them going backwards at that juncture... I wonder what they factored in for being so disjointed you missed the snap while still hanging on to a prayer of reaching makable FG range for one of Jerry's long kickers...

cstjohn17

Sanchez is a little punk but he finds a way to win, almost despite himself. I hope he throws up all over himself when the Patriots beat them 150-0 in the playoffs but his history says he shows up in big games.

Before I forget, he is also a punk ass, weasel.

RodThePat

This TQBR stat is absolutely useless. It's even worse than Passer Rating in that it just doesn't represent what you saw on the field as accurately.

RodThePat

Actually, the thing with passer rating is that within the context of a single game, it could be completely useless, but over the course of a season/career it's a pretty good indicator of a QB's performance. Actually, if you use Passer Rating+ as an index, (which basically measures a QB's rating in relation to the league average in the time period in which he accrued his stats), then it gets even better.

TQBR just has too many subjective components in it's formula to be as good a representation of efficiency.

PatsWickedPissah

It's clear from Romo's relatively high QBR rating after his multiple game killing bonehead unforced errors that the subjective measures are completely disfunctional. Useless metric.

__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as "bad luck." RAH

RodThePat

And can anyone in planet Earth explain to me how in the hell is Drew Brees' "clutch" rating that much lower than Cam Newton's?