ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Yesterday afternoon, I dug through the archives looking for an "old" game to watch. I chose the December 24, 2006 game in Jacksonville and took a good look at it.
In the game's intro, Gumbel and Dierdorf discussed how important the game was for both teams. The Jags were 8-6 and desperately needed a win to stay in playoff contention. The Patriots had yet to even clinch a playoff berth, and Gumbel mentioned how Belichick urged his players not to be overconfident and allow themselves to back into the playoffs.
The Pats, despite giving up that boneheaded Jones-Drew miracle TD run, were able to win, 24-21 to clinch the AFC East. Though they had destroyed the Texans the week before, they had been shutout in Miami before that, and barely beat the Lions prior to that. If they had won in Miami, they would have most likely leapfrogged the Colts for the 3rd seed, and probably have played the AFC Championship at home in January.
Yet, in Week 16, we knew none of that. In fact, that same week, Ron Dayne had thrashed through the Colts' defense to open up a 14-0 Texans lead. During halftime, Dan Marino used yet another example of the Colts' terrible run defense that year to support why "The Colts would not win the Super Bowl." Well, he was wrong.
During the regular season, the Colts were dead last in rushing defense. In fact, the 31st team, the Rams, had 40 less yards/game than the Colts' 173. They began the season with 110 yards to Tiki Barber, and ended it with 115 to Ronnie Brown.
In the playoffs, something changed. Some say it was Booger McFarland finally turning it on. Others credit Bob Sanders. No matter what, the Colts held Larry Johnson to 32 yards. Jamal Lewis to 53 yards. Corey Dillon to 48 yards. Thomas Jones had 112 in the Super Bowl, but even that was less than 65% of the Colts' season average (The Bears had 111 net rushing, too). The Colts went 12-4, had a horrendous rushing defense, but turned things around when it really mattered.
Or, let's go back one more season - another year in which the Pats fell short in the playoffs. The 2005 Pittsburgh Steelers. A #6 seed. Losers to the Patriots, Jaguars, Ravens, Colts, and Bengals. However, 4 of those 5 teams ended up in the playoffs. And of those teams, all (perhaps not the Jaguars) were considered to be better teams than the Steelers. The Steelers finished the season with four straight wins, including a 41-0 thumping of the Browns. Nobody here wanted to play them. The Pats threw their final game of the season in order to achieve that, too. Then, the Steelers went on to knock off the high-flying Bengals, the media darlings, the Broncos, and the Seahawks. Champions of the National Football League. There's only one.
How about the 2007 New York Giants? Losses to Dallas and Green Bay to open the season. Another loss to the Cowboys. A 24-point loss to the Vikings in late November. A loss to the Redskins. A loss to the Patriots. In this case, you have a 10-6 team who again only lost to one non-playoff team. They go into the playoffs and shock the world, beating the Buccaneers, Cowboys, Packers, and as we know, the Patriots. The 2007 season is over. The 16-0 Patriots will never be champions. The Giants will always remember this season.
Belichick preaches better performance down the stretch. Did anyone think the post-Thanksgiving (or post-bye) Patriots were as good as their out-the-gate version? They lost Morris and Colvin, sure. You throw in Faulk and Seau and you're in good shape. That wasn't the problem. Even Vrabel said the 2007 Patriots didn't follow the classical model of improving late in the season. They didn't improve. They were still winning football games, but just coasting to the finish. Don't believe me? Let's chart the season:
And it's tough to make an argument for the second half schedule being harder, considering the end of season winning percentages for the 12-17 games were .400, and the 1-11 games a .510.
Or how about the playoffs? Some of these numbers are worse too:
Certainly not the Belichick way. Notice how the offensive sacks increase throughout the season, and how the rushing numbers decrease. I think we all saw this. The offensive line did get worse as the year went on. Or how about the defensive passing yards? That secondary, as we remember, was making A.J. Feeley, Kyle Boller, and Eli Manning look like Hall of Famers. This is also made evident in the spike of the defensive 3rd down conversion rate. They couldn't get off the field.
However, what's most noticeable is the scoring margin, especially in terms of the quality of opponents. Something wasn't right after the Eagles and Ravens came that close to beating the Patriots. Something wasn't right after a blocked punt was the difference against Mangini's Jets. The elements can certainly be blamed, sure. I personally think it was complacency. Arrogance. Belichick tried hard to keep that out of his team's mind. Did it work? All I know is that, even after wins down the stretch, I walked away from games with an uneasy sense that not finishing strong would come back to hurt them. The Patriots' playoff wins were unspectacular and featured such things as Dennis Northcutt dropping an easy touchdown and Tom Brady throwing two easy interceptions to the Chargers. Something didn't seem right. Perhaps fittingly, it all came crashing down two weeks later. Nothing can change what happened that night. All the Patriots can do is try to not make the same mistakes twice. Welcome to 2008.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
and yet after all that the pats only lost the SB by 3, of 19 games, one less, and by 3, to the NFC Champion...
we truly were the best team to ever grace a football field, and its now time to create a team better then the one that we had last year, to give us that one other, more important win
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty
Exactly, what happens if we won the SB by 3 instead? Would those same feelings about the team be the same (Tom throwing 2 easy picks to SD in playoffs, etc.)? Its not the margin of vistory to me in the playoffs..it's just the W! Yes, we didn't get the W so I can see the point in analyzing the season progression & how the team was not the same... Some times football 9like any other sport really) is a game of luck / inches /etc..& that's what happened in the end (e.g. the freakin helmet catch by Tyree!) to the PATS...its that hard to go perfect....
I would of loved that perfect season! LET's TRY AGAIN!!!!!!!
You certainly aren't giving any credit to other teams adjustments. I think this whole theory is tainted by the fact that:
A) the teams we faced in the first half were all crappy. We faced Sand Diego who was in turmoil at that point and the Dallas game was closer than the score IMO.
B) other teams didn't know what to expect with Moss and it was difficult to adjust.
C) Our defense was never very good. I denied this all season long, waiting for that "statement game" from the D that never came. Our offense came flying out of the gate at other teams in the beginning and it caught them off guard. The Pats went up so huge on teams, so quickly, that the D just played that soft nickel. They never shut anyone down who wasn't already out of the game.
Exactly, what happens if we won the SB by 3 instead? Would those same feelings about the team be the same (Tom throwing 2 easy picks to SD in playoffs, etc.)? Its not the margin of vistory to me in the playoffs..it's just the W! Yes, we didn't get the W so I can see the point in analyzing the season progression & how the team was not the same... Some times football 9like any other sport really) is a game of luck / inches /etc..& that's what happened in the end (e.g. the freakin helmet catch by Tyree!) to the PATS...its that hard to go perfect....
I would of loved that perfect season! LET's TRY AGAIN!!!!!!!
If they had played the same game and happened to pull something off at the end, then yes. The Super Bowl was probably the best example of what I'm talking about. Does the OL of October 5 have that kind of game? I don't think so.
You certainly aren't giving any credit to other teams adjustments. I think this whole theory is tainted by the fact that:
A) the teams we faced in the first half were all crappy. We faced Sand Diego who was in turmoil at that point and the Dallas game was closer than the score IMO.
What about the second half? The Dolphins were 1-13, the Jets not much better. Both the Ravens and Eagles were on the outside of the playoff picture. And what about the Colts in the first half? Besides them, there was nothing either, I guess. But that theory would mean only the Pats, Colts, and Cowboys were "good" teams.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7
B) other teams didn't know what to expect with Moss and it was difficult to adjust.
I think by October 28 (52-7 Redskins win) or November 18 (56-10 Buffalo win) they knew what to expect. After that, it was downhill. And I have a hard time believing the atrocious Jets, Dolphins, and Giants secondaries could adjust to stop Moss.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7
C) Our defense was never very good. I denied this all season long, waiting for that "statement game" from the D that never came. Our offense came flying out of the gate at other teams in the beginning and it caught them off guard. The Pats went up so huge on teams, so quickly, that the D just played that soft nickel. They never shut anyone down who wasn't already out of the game.
It certainly didn't get any better as the year went on.
One possible reason for the Pats "fading" down the stretch, if we can call it that (the Pats surged in '05 down the stretch, surged in '06, winning 3 straight by a margin of 104-51, and entered the playoffs undefeated in '07) is that our drafts have not produced an elite rookie crop since '05. The emergence of a talented rookie crop adds energy to a team down the stretch, young energy that older teams lack. A great draft is like fuel for the whole franchise. The Pats had Seymour and Light in '01; Samuel, Wilson, B. Johnson, Koppen, in '03; the awesome '03 rookies spilled over into '04 and were joined by Wilfork; The season didn't really turn around in '05 until the defense solidified, with Hobbs taking over as a starter maybe the biggest change IMO. In '06, Maroney was injured down the stretch and IMO the Pats wrongly moved away from D.Thomas and back to Watson when the latter returned from injury for the playoffs in '06, despite Thomas' break out performances vs. Houston and Jax. Thomas' absence from the game plan hurt the receiving corps in the '06 playoffs. Last season only Meriweather was a minor contributor. The draft is the life blood of the franchise.
As an example, the Giants had a fantastic '07 class that energized the franchise as Ross, Boss, Smith, Bradshaw etc. emerged down the stretch. In '06 the Colts became great down the stetch on the strength of Addai's fresh legs and Antoine Bethea becoming an impact starter. In '05 Heath Miller was a key cog in the Pitt passing game, catching a huge TD vs Indy. Also Bryant McFadden the cb was in man coverage on Reggie Wayne, breaking up that last second bomb to the end zone with a spectacular play. Our rookies have not contributed like that in the latter stages of the past 2 seasons, the vets have become exhausted under the pressure and scrutiny of being the world's most famous team, and IMO that is why the team has lost steam down the stretch. Another minor factor is that our offense has been consistently outcoached in big games since Charlie left. In Denver, Indy and NYG games, the offense has failed in key moments and the coaching is responsible for much of that. The awful 12 men in the huddle vs Indy, the inability to adjust a game plan vs the NYG, the susceptibility to the blitz vs Denver.
Last edited by PonyExpress; 03-09-2008 at 01:42 PM..
One possible reason for the Pats "fading" down the stretch, if we can call it that (the Pats surged in '05 down the stretch, surged in '06, winning 3 straight by a margin of 104-51, and entered the playoffs undefeated in '07) is that our drafts have not produced an elite rookie crop since '05. The emergence of a talented rookie crop adds energy to a team down the stretch, young energy that older teams lack. A great draft is like fuel for the whole franchise. The Pats had Seymour and Light in '01; Samuel, Wilson, B. Johnson, Koppen, in '03; the awesome '03 rookies spilled over into '04 and were joined by Wilfork; The season didn't really turn around in '05 until the defense solidified, with Hobbs taking over as a starter maybe the biggest change IMO. In '06, Maroney was injured down the stretch and IMO the Pats wrongly moved away from D.Thomas and back to Watson when the latter returned from injury for the playoffs in '06, despite Thomas' break out performances vs. Houston and Jax. Thomas' absence from the game plan hurt the receiving corps in the '06 playoffs. Last season only Meriweather was a minor contributor. The draft is the life blood of the franchise.
As an example, the Giants had a fantastic '07 class that energized the franchise as Ross, Boss, Smith, Bradshaw etc. emerged down the stretch. In '06 the Colts became great down the stetch on the strength of Addai's fresh legs and Antoine Bethea becoming an impact starter. In '05 Heath Miller was a key cog in the Pitt passing game, catching a huge TD vs Indy. Also Bryant McFadden the cb was in man coverage on Reggie Wayne, breaking up that last second bomb to the end zone with a spectacular play. Our rookies have not contributed like that in the latter stages of the past 2 seasons, the vets have become exhausted under the pressure and scrutiny of being the world's most famous team, and IMO that is why the team has lost steam down the stretch. Another minor factor is that our offense has been consistently outcoached in big games since Charlie left. In Denver, Indy and NYG games, the offense has failed in key moments and the coaching is responsible for much of that. The awful 12 men in the huddle vs Indy, the inability to adjust a game plan vs the NYG, the susceptibility to the blitz vs Denver.
Outstanding posts by Pats1 and Pony. The last complete 60-minute game executed by the NEP was at Buffalo. Various degrees of uneasiness followed every game thereafter.
Pony, you let the '04 draft off the hook, IMHO. Big Vince has been the only member of that class to make a significant contribution. I said it almost 4 years ago, and I'll say it again: It would have made more sense for the NEP to select Karlos Dansby instead of Bennie Watson. The rest of the draft was absolute garbage.
Random Sunday morning thought
Linear Mode
