ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Not to knitpick, but it would be just be DT, they aren't left and right tackles, and its weak/strong in the 43.
He's got it right I think. If you look at the defensive playbook for Belichick's 1997 Jets, they have LDT and RDT and ROLB and LOLB in the defensive huddle, and LDT and RDT on the field. It gets confusing because when the defensive sets up, they call strong/weak for the linebackers and ROLB and LOLB become Sam and Will accordingly, but they don't switch sides.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
He's got it right I think. If you look at the defensive playbook for Belichick's 1997 Jets, they have LDT and RDT and ROLB and LOLB in the defensive huddle, and LDT and RDT on the field. It gets confusing because when the defensive sets up, they call strong/weak for the linebackers and ROLB and LOLB become Sam and Will accordingly, but they don't switch sides.
I didn't realize we were running the Jets' 1997 defense...
Seriously, it all depends on personnel and the game plan. For example, you'll see the Pats' ILBs switch sides quite often based on strength. Not so much the OLBs because it's a hell of a long way to run when a TE goes in motion....
Yesterday, they were clearly putting Nink in a traditional Sam role where he lines up on the LOS over the TE and Guyton was in a typical Wil role off the LOS...
Guyton, for all his warts I think is our best cover LB. Spikes is built for MLB in a 4-3 and Mayo will wreak ***** as a WLB. I think Fletcher, as good as he looked last night, won't get too many starts. But I'm sure BB will give him plenty of PT if Fletcher keeps his level of play pretty high. Loved the way he didn't hesitate whatsoever when he saw an opening.
Not to knitpick, but it would be just be DT, they aren't left and right tackles, and its weak/strong in the 43.
At least last night when I looked, it was all left and right. There wasn't any switching based on strong and weak. But yes, left is basically equivalent to strong and right to weak.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
While Fletcher played well, you guys are way too high on him. He's got special teamer written all over him. And he looks a bit... light. Maybe another year in the weight room?
Seriously, a starter? We'll see.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Hey Favre, YOU SUCK!!!
The Boston Herald - It ain't toilet paper, but it'll do the job.
While Fletcher played well, you guys are way too high on him. He's got special teamer written all over him. And he looks a bit... light. Maybe another year in the weight room?
Seriously, a starter? We'll see.
He was 248 in June, probably playing around that now. He was probably closer to 240 as a rookie.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake Nate Ebner
No big deal...only took me 3 defensive plays to be drafted before Tom Brady
You want a personnel grouping that could also play a 3-4.
DL Wilfork/Haynesworth/Ellis
DL/LB Cunningham
LB Mayo/Spikes/Ninko
meets that standard.
G. Warren and Fletcher are in the mix to be top "breather" subs, as well as to pick off some regular sub-package roles.
Wright, Moore, Anderson, and Guyton are in the mix for specific sub roles. They all have excellent chances of making the roster, but stand at risk of losing out on snaps (Wright least so).
Love has a good chance at making the roster as Wilfork's backup, and of getting a few "breather" snaps as a game-day active (especially once the injuries start and everybody healthy is a game-day active, irrespective of position).
Brace and Deaderick are on PUP looking in.
Other youngsters have various levels of longshot chances of making the roster, mainly ahead of guys I've already named.
While Fletcher played well, you guys are way too high on him. He's got special teamer written all over him. And he looks a bit... light. Maybe another year in the weight room?
Seriously, a starter? We'll see.
He looks like he belongs. I'm not sure what you're watching.