ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Ok, this post makes me want to call you retarded, although I won't.
The Patriots have the most explosive offense of all-time. That's numerical. If you want to bring back the 6 year old "Brady is nothing but a dinker-dunker" arguement; I suggest you watch the first Jets game, the Chargers Game, The Cinicinatti game, The First Buffalo Game, The First Miami game, The Washington Game, The Second Buffalo game and the Giants game to see how "Non-Explosive" this offense is. Also throw in the Colts game, because it's the reason they lost. You don't throw for 4800 yds and 50 TD by dinking and dunking. You just don't. I have no idea what team you're watching by some of your comments.
I get what he's saying. The pats offense is explosive, but they also have the ability to methodically rip piece by piece. The other teams that were known as explosive lived and died with the long ball or some sort of quick hit and couldn't score any other way. Billick's playbook in 98-99 entailed a variety of plays such as long pass to moss, bomb to moss, deep throw to moss, and dear god let moss catch this. This offense will take what you give them and don't have just one way to beat you, and they're just as likely to have a 15 play 10 minute drive as to score a 70 yarder. He worded it in an odd fashion, but I get what he's saying.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
The Chargers corners are clearly better than the Patriots'.
That said, to say the Patriots defensive backs aren't good isn't just silly, it's also just flat out wrong.
And again, you're matching up Defensive Backs and Receivers as if they're going to play man up coverage. If they do that, the Patriots will win by multiple touchdowns. Norv Turner essentially said himself he would never put Cromartie on Moss in man up coverage in his presser today.
I think you should read what I wrote again. I said they were great as a unit. They played zone and they are very very smart and don't blow many coverages. The Patriots strengths are in their ability to keep everything in front of them and force turnovers. I just think that talent wise the Chargers are clearly superior but they blow coverages on occasion but they also take chances and get the turnovers better than anyone in the league.
I get what he's saying. The pats offense is explosive, but they also have the ability to methodically rip piece by piece. The other teams that were known as explosive lived and died with the long ball or some sort of quick hit and couldn't score any other way. Billick's playbook in 98-99 entailed a variety of plays such as long pass to moss, bomb to moss, deep throw to moss, and dear god let moss catch this. This offense will take what you give them and don't have just one way to beat you, and they're just as likely to have a 15 play 10 minute drive as to score a 70 yarder. He worded it in an odd fashion, but I get what he's saying.
exactly. When my A.D.D. kicks in I find it hard to word my sentences.
Cro has grown into probably the best CB in the league
No, he is not the best CB in the league. In another year or two he may very well but, but right now he's not. I'm not taking anything away from the guy but he needs just a little more seasoning to get the savvy of a guy like Ty Law or other CBs who have stayed at the top of their game for the bulk of their career.
Quote:
but also there is an argument that he's not even the best CB on the team with Jammer. Florence is good but we've kinda soured on his immaturity but he has talent that's for sure.
Jammer's great, no doubt. I'd take Jammer over any CB on the field, but I'd take Asante second even with his abyssmal game last week. He's got a more proven track record than Cromartie.
Harrison and Sanders, who I feel is underrated, I take over them over your safeties.
What gets lost in this, and I think bears serious consideration, is that as the season wore on there was absolutely no doubt that teams were preparing for the Patriots like it was their super bowl. Teams that had no business playing out of their minds did so. Certainly some of that is on the Patriots' D but you've also got to give credit where credit is due. In spite of that, and the huge leads this team often put on other teams, they very nearly lead the league in points allowed.
In the end I do give the nod to SD's defense overall for talent and speed without any doubt. Not to get all silly but I do feel that the Patriots' D holds a serious edge when it comes to experience and savvy and these things do seem to pay dividends in the post season even if they cannot be captured on a stat sheet.
So I guess we're basically agreeing with each other, for the most part.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No, he is not the best CB in the league. In another year or two he may very well but, but right now he's not. I'm not taking anything away from the guy but he needs just a little more seasoning to get the savvy of a guy like Ty Law or other CBs who have stayed at the top of their game for the bulk of their career.
Jammer's great, no doubt. I'd take Jammer over any CB on the field, but I'd take Asante second even with his abyssmal game last week. He's got a more proven track record than Cromartie.
Harrison and Sanders, who I feel is underrated, I take over them over your safeties.
What gets lost in this, and I think bears serious consideration, is that as the season wore on there was absolutely no doubt that teams were preparing for the Patriots like it was their super bowl. Teams that had no business playing out of their minds did so. Certainly some of that is on the Patriots' D but you've also got to give credit where credit is due. In spite of that, and the huge leads this team often put on other teams, they very nearly lead the league in points allowed.
In the end I do give the nod to SD's defense overall for talent and speed without any doubt. Not to get all silly but I do feel that the Patriots' D holds a serious edge when it comes to experience and savvy and these things do seem to pay dividends in the post season even if they cannot be captured on a stat sheet.
So I guess we're basically agreeing with each other, for the most part.
As a member of the BHC, my name is Dojo and I support this post
Williams and Wilfork are even when they're healthy, but from what I saw against the colts, Williams isn't healthy and hasn't been all season.
Williams has always struggled against smaller OLinemen for some reason. But you're right, he's been struggling with his health all season. Hopefully he could return to form and have another 4 good years in him because we're not ready to replace him yet.
You're never ready to replace a dominant nose tackle, and that position makes the rest of the 3-4 defense's world go 'round. You don't know how long a player can last once their injury is nagging, especially when we're talking about a player that needs all the leverage he can get to slam his 300 pound body into one or more other 300 pound bodies. Perhaps he will come back and return to his old ways, but it wouldn't suprise me if the opposite happened especially considering his age. Why is Williams only recently known as one of the best? Is is because the chargers are good? You don't magically turn into a premier nose guard at 31 years of age.
You're never ready to replace a dominant nose tackle, and that position makes the rest of the 3-4 defense's world go 'round. You don't know how long a player can last once their injury is nagging, especially when we're talking about a player that needs all the leverage he can get to slam his 300 pound body into one or more other 300 pound bodies. Perhaps he will come back and return to his old ways, but it wouldn't suprise me if the opposite happened especially considering his age. Why is Williams only recently known as one of the best? Is is because the chargers are good? You don't magically turn into a premier nose guard at 31 years of age.
He really hit his stride a couple years ago.
Some players just "click" later (Mike Vrabel, for example)
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-Don't disreputeatate me.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
New England's defensive line is better. How anyone can even question this is curious to me. Wilfork has become better than Williams, Seymour and Warren make it so 3 of the best 4 DL are Patriots, and Jarvis Green would be a starter for the Chargers but can't crack the lineup in New England.
New England's Db's are better. Samuel, Hobbs, Gay, Harrison, Sanders comprise the 'starting' 5, with Meriweather, Wilson and company filling out the depth. San Diego's safeties are terrible.
I rate the linebackers relatively even. Vrabel is the best LB on either team, while Thomas is probably the most talented when Merriman isn't on the juice (in a year where people have complained that they think he is disappearing in games, Thomas still had 78 tackles and 6.5 sacks despite that injury early in the season). People have been pimping up Phillips and Merriman for 2 years, but Vrabel has shown he can get to the quarterback just as well as any Charger linebacker (12.5 sacks this season, and it's amazing that he's STILL frequently ignored when people talk about this defense). I'd take the starting 4 for New England over the Chargers, but I'd still call things even because Colvin's absence gives S.D. the nod when it comes to depth.
__________________
"The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."
- Marcus Aurelius