ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
didnt we also lose the 5th round pick cuz of doug gabriel? which means we only kept our 6th round pick...
btw, wut did we do with the 3rd one? i dont remember
__________________
Last time I lived in New England the Pats became a Dynasty
Then I moved away and they haven't won since
...now I'm moving back, and a Lombardi I predict
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
There's a lot left to be determined, but the whole discussion reminds me of that Jimmy Johnson comment on draft picks. Can't find the exact quote, but the gist is that draft picks are capital that you can spend in a variety of ways: draft a player, trade up, down or into the future, or trade for veterans. Regardless of approach, it's about making good use of the available capital. Welker, Moss and the highest pick the Patriots have had in the BB era adds up to a nice investment portfolio--despite taking a beating on the day-2 "junk bonds."
Capital is a good way of defining how a team can fill its needs despite the fact the draft doesn't always provide the college players that match those needs. Welker, Moss and the remainder of the collegiate draft class made the Pats into the team they are today. Good info and well stated.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. The Dude Abides . . . .
There's a lot left to be determined, but the whole discussion reminds me of that Jimmy Johnson comment on draft picks. Can't find the exact quote, but the gist is that draft picks are capital that you can spend in a variety of ways: draft a player, trade up, down or into the future, or trade for veterans. Regardless of approach, it's about making good use of the available capital. Welker, Moss and the highest pick the Patriots have had in the BB era adds up to a nice investment portfolio--despite taking a beating on the day-2 "junk bonds."
Nicely done, it seems that for the Pats the draft is sometimes a necessary side show that may help, but there is more than one way reload.
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Re: Stop criticizing the Patriots' 2007 draft (merged)
Well, Kareem Brown just got picked up by the Jets...He was drafted in '07 right?
__________________
You can't be two feet tall and expect to take over the world...unless you're Doug Flutie. -MST3K To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"You're all a bunch yahoos, hero worshipers and gutless suck-ups." - Tony Massarotti
Re: Stop criticizing the Patriots' 2007 draft (merged)
The fact that Kareem Brown was claimed off waivers by THREE teams (Jets, Ravens, Niners) is a pretty good indication that he wasn't a bad pick... there's simply no roster space for all the talent we have on the team.
I thought the same for Justin Rogers and Garrett Mills and Corey Mays... these are players that looked promising for us over the long haul, but BB was forced to offer them up to other teams and Dallas, Minnesota and Cinci (respectively) did so. Those guys are all playing in the NFL.
So, it's not poor talent evaluation. It's just that the roster turnover has not been there.
What the Pats did in 2007, basically trading out of the draft, is precisely what they need to do more of. Instead of wasting the pick on a good player who's eventually going to play for the Jets or Cowboys, let some other team draft him, and bundle the pick for future considerations so when the next Lawrence Taylor DOES come into the draft, the Pats are positioned to take him.
It's a concern, because we're losing our young blood. BB/SP can backfill with players like Thomas, Welker and Stallworth, and that's great... but it's not sustainable over the long haul. Eventually, you'll need those rookie contracts on the roster to fit against the cap.
__________________
"We want to build a big, strong, tough, smart, fast, disciplined football team that will consistently compete for a championship."
-- Scott Pioli, from the Patriots scouting manual
despite taking a beating on the day-2 "junk bonds."
Day-2 "junk bonds" huh?
2000 Tom Brady 6th Round
2002 Jarvis Green 4th Round
2002 David Givens 7th Round
2003 Asante Samuel 4th Round
2003 Dan Koppen 5th Round
2005 James Sanders 4th Round
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!
Re: Stop criticizing the Patriots' 2007 draft (merged)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rookBoston
The fact that Kareem Brown was claimed off waivers by THREE teams (Jets, Ravens, Niners) is a pretty good indication that he wasn't a bad pick... there's simply no roster space for all the talent we have on the team.
It's also a nice sign for 2006 pick Le Kevin Smith.
2000 Tom Brady 6th Round
2002 Jarvis Green 4th Round
2002 David Givens 7th Round
2003 Asante Samuel 4th Round
2003 Dan Koppen 5th Round
2005 James Sanders 4th Round
Yep, 6 starting-caliber players in 8 years! Given an average of 5 day-2 picks a year (including comp picks) that yields less than a 1-in-6 chance of hitting on each day-2 pick. Now add in the strongest, deepest roster in the league and an unusually weak draft, and you're in very low odds territory.
I do respect the value of late round picks (and I still hold out a lot of hope for Mike Richardson!) but a low yield in this situation isn't a surprise.
Now add in the strongest, deepest roster in the league and an unusually weak draft, and you're in very low odds territory.
Deepest roster? I beg to differ since the New England Patriots are extremely thin at cornerback and linebacker while now down to six defensive lineman on the 53 man roster.
As for Chad Brown, he's a complete joke.
__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!