ATippett56

For once, an intellectual article is written that exposes the fraud that Peyton Manning is without his all-star cast of characters!

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

__________________
The End of the Chad Ochostinko Era!

Joker

Like the way you Dolts fans do over the millions of disgusting ballwashing Pay-Me-Tons articles?

everlong

You Colts fans are so sensitive to every negative article about your team. I'll admit that it's a small sample size since this is the first one but I'm sure you and your binky will do a few more ads and be ok.

__________________
"When Peyton Manning was a kid he used to go to bed at night and dream about throwing the winning touchdown for the Saints in the Superbowl. And on Sunday he did."

There's only two conclusions for Patriots fans on rookies. They are either a bust or being fitted for their bust in Canton.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

RhodyPatriot

I seem to recall at least one of those picks was an underthrown ball to that 'inexperienced scrub' Reggie Wayne. (sarcasm fully intended)
Tom Brady doesn't bad mouth anybody over anything. In the same interview he praised that sad group of receivers he had to work with last year. Brady doesn't bad mouth, he doesn't make excuses and he doesn't whine.
Some of the many things that sets him apart from Manning in a very positive way.

RodThePat

Of course, 'cause everyone expected Tom to come out and say: "Saw that, guys? 6 F'ING PICKS! Told ya, that dude's not in my league!"


At least 4 of his INTs were his fault alone. If you don't have superstar receivers and haven't developed timing with the scrubs, you have to adapt to it.

You can't throw to Aaron Moorehead the same way you throw to Marvin Harrison. Imagine Brady slingin' jump balls in double coverage to Doug Gabriel?

captain stone

Actually, he did, last year, against the dolts, on their first drive of the game, after they ran for 6, 7 and 4 yards the previous 3 plays.

http://www.nfl.com/liveupdate/gamece...E_Gamebook.pdf

(What also pissed me off about that INT was that Gabriel jumped over Bethea in order to avoid contact, and thusly allowed him to return the football to the dolts' 32.)

The difference is, that TB, with his rating of 34, was rightly ripped for losing that game; whereas Payaton, with his rating of 49.4, was deified by Zimmerman in one of the gayest, most deceitful and unprofessional articles I have ever had the displeasure of reading.

__________________
Question Authority.

reflexblue

Z should do what he's really wanted to do for a few years. Move to New Zealand and write reviews on wine.
Yes, he should whine about wine.

__________________
S.H.E.S.
I Likes Spikes.

PromisedLand

The irony is that what Dr. Z should have written exactly parallels what you just wrote:

Peyton Manning is a well-respected football quarterback who played one of the worst games ever.

__________________
It's so simple, even a Jets fan could do it.ä
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

mtbykr

__________________
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits". - Albert Einstein

VJCPatriot

I think that was an excellent article by the Cold Hard Football Facts (http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com..._pigskin.html). Dr. Z got called out every step of the way. Even without the added commentary, if you just read Dr. Z's article alone you would soon realize that it is a sad exercise in rationalization and mental fallacy. The Cold, Hard, Football facts article just highlights how bad Z's thinking and writing were in that sham of an article.

When in the world did a 6 interception performance leading to a LOSS, give rise to a lovefest of praise and worship for the losing QB? That is just retarded and Dr. Z should be ashamed of what he wrote. If he isn't, he has obviously gone senile. If he was drunk when he wrote it, and admits it, then at least he has a partial excuse. If he turned in that article while sober, my estimation for his abilities as a writer and critical thinker has just gone down the tubes.

Here is a choice excerpt in which Dr. Z directly contradicts himself and CHFF calls him out on it:

"A quarterback who stands tall in the pocket, facing a minimal rush, throwing to an all star cast of receivers is a pretty picture, but there's nothing about it that reaches me on an emotional level."

[Well, we guess Dr. Z never cared for Manning before ... because that single sentence pretty much describes Manning’s entire career ... "standing tall in the pocket ... minimal rush ... all-star cast of receivers." Do they teach irony at the Third-World medical school where Dr. Z studied the pigskin sciences?]

That sentence alone really, really BOGGLES my mind. Does Dr. Z not realize that Manning has been exactly that QB for the past several years, especially during his 49 TD year? His offensive line protected him so well that he was barely touched, and he had all pro receivers around him in the persons of Wayne, Harrison, [Stokely before 2007], and Clark. The defenses were afraid to blitz him because they didn't want those dangerous Colt receivers left in one on one coverage. Dr. Z crapped the bed with this article. He should print a retraction and an apology to the readers that used to take him seriously. IMO Dr. Z has slipped off the deep end with this sad effort at so called sports jounalism.

__________________