ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I'm a Jets fan who thought the penalty was too harsh. I believe a number 1 is a steep price to pay for this violation. I think a suspension of Belichick for a couple of games would have been more appropriate, but I do understand Goodell's intentions.
I think the reason Goodell made it a #1 was:
a) for impact when it was reported in the media
b) he knows the Pats have an additional #1 from San Fran, so losing this one, which is, in essence a high 2nd rounder, since we should be picking somewhere between 26 - 32, wouldn't hurt as much as losing the San Fran pick, which is probably going to be bwteen 8 -15.
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Look, they dinged us a #1. Life is cruel, ***** happens, move on. Would we all like it back, no question. But for every Logan Mankins, there is a Chad Jackson.......its all a crapshoot
We will survive, team will survive. I have faith in Pioli and BB abilities to draft well. We still have a SF #1 (likely 15-20 range), our #2, Raiders #3, and our #3. We have a Young core on Offense and great leadership on D.
I completely agree that our team will survive. In fact it is going to just keep getting better and better, but the loss of a first rounder is absolutely a big deal. I would much rather have Logan Mankins AND Chad Jackson, than JUST Chad Jackson. If this hit us in a year where we DIDN'T have SF's #1 as well I think many people on this board would be singing a different tune about the severity of the punishment.
Now I still think that the punishment was fair. While it is true that this is the harshest penatly that the league has handed down, you really can't compare the salary cap issue with Denver and this. Not because the offense was different, but because the times are different. It is a different commish (who has clearly decided to cast himself as the law and order type of guy) and almost a decade later. The league itself, and the entire sports world (think about all the sports scandals that have been going on...I'm thinking particularly NBA brawl here) are in a very different place now than they were ten years ago. In the legal world, precedent means a lot, but the law does have to change with the times.
With that said I believe our Pats have been managed so well in the past few years that this is not nearly as devistating as it would be to most other teams. I think I would go as far as saying we are the only team that can absorb the loss of a first round pick and still have the possibilty of still having the excellent draft. No other team can.
After watching the 49ers scrape by the cardinals the other night I agree with other posters here. It was a great trade last draft and it is very possible that we will have a lot of ability for movement. I would not be surprised if we have a 2008 first round pick and 2 picks again in 2009
a) for impact when it was reported in the media
b) he knows the Pats have an additional #1 from San Fran, so losing this one, which is, in essence a high 2nd rounder, since we should be picking somewhere between 26 - 32, wouldn't hurt as much as losing the San Fran pick, which is probably going to be bwteen 8 -15.
I totally agree with this. Since we have 2 #1s Goodell can take one of them away and appease both sides of the issue. 1) The harsh critics who wanted day one drafts picks (plus) and 2) the Patriots who won't complain as much because they have another pick.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. - 4 years = To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I totally agree with this. Since we have 2 #1s Goodell can take one of them away and appease both sides of the issue. 1) The harsh critics who wanted day one drafts picks (plus) and 2) the Patriots who won't complain as much because they have another pick.
Except that I think Goodell knows that he is setting a precedent for the rest of his tenure as commish for offenses similar or worse than this one. Of course he needed to seem fair in the eyes of both sides, but I don't think he would do this just because we also had SF's #1.
Big deal. Somehow, someway, the Pats will end up with 2 first round picks in 2009 like they always do. With only 2 draft picks in 2007 making the team, I think they will be fine.
I really hope BB has proof of other teams doing it and screws them, if everyone loses their first round picks, its goign to be a fast first round.
__________________
"Spirituality, Faith, and Democracy are the cornerstones of our country. We are all Patriots, and tonight the Patriots are World Champions."
-Robert Kraft, 2/3/2002
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think the gloves are off with Mangini. If BB gets a chance to ruin his career, he'll do it. Lets be honest, BB is a pr*ck and he is vindictive.
__________________
"Spirituality, Faith, and Democracy are the cornerstones of our country. We are all Patriots, and tonight the Patriots are World Champions."
-Robert Kraft, 2/3/2002
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I think the gloves are off with Mangini. If BB gets a chance to ruin his career, he'll do it. Lets be honest, BB is a pr*ck and he is vindictive.
All I care is the Raven beat the effin crap out of Jets, and then Dec 16th we run up the score down the RAT's throat (50+). The th NY media can have a field day
The penatly isn't just excessive, it's stupid. The commissioner is punishing the franchise for the misdeeds of the coach. A 1st is a long term punishment which will be felt for years to come. It's a Logan Mankins, Daniel Graham, Larence Maroney, etc. What happens if BB is gone in a year or two? BB should have been suspended & fined, while the franchise should have lost a less expensive pick. He should have punished the man responsible, and not so much the franchise and fans.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897