The Franchise Tag - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2007, 09:26 PM   #1
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 
Slagathor's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Worcester
Posts: 1,424
Default The Franchise Tag

Does anyone think the Pats were willing to give up the franchise tag on Asante because they thought they might want to use it on Moss next year?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Slagathor is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 09-09-2007, 09:33 PM   #2
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,128
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

They were willing to give up the franchise tag because they wanted Asante to play this year.
mgteich is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:34 PM   #3
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,190
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

And perhaps knew what was going to happen to Harrison?
Va_Pats_Fan is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:38 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,128
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

and they knew the injury status of Seymour.
mgteich is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:41 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,210
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slagathor View Post
Does anyone think the Pats were willing to give up the franchise tag on Asante because they thought they might want to use it on Moss next year?
No. Why would you tag a guy who is well known to just quit when he's disgruntled? A guy who can be a cancer in the locker room when he's pissed off?
sieglo is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:47 PM   #6
praedica numerum!
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,281
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by sieglo View Post
No. Why would you tag a guy who is well known to just quit when he's disgruntled? A guy who can be a cancer in the locker room when he's pissed off?
To trade him.

I don't think that was their plan at all when they gave the concession to Samuel, but that's done and now they will possibly look at Moss as Plan B if he has a great season and wants to get paid like the best WR in the league..
alamo is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 09:52 PM   #7
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,210
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by alamo View Post
To trade him.

I don't think that was their plan at all when they gave the concession to Samuel, but that's done and now they will possibly look at Moss as Plan B if he has a great season and wants to get paid like the best WR in the league..
I think Moss has been there and done that. If this year continues to go well for him, and he finds happiness with the Pats, I think he'll settle for a high, but reasonable, salary with the Pats next year in order to stay on the team.
sieglo is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 10:07 PM   #8
On the Roster
 
TaxPlaya's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 52
Send a message via AIM to TaxPlaya Send a message via Yahoo to TaxPlaya
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

It makes a lot of sense, assuming they can't re-sign him. The non-exclusive (2 1RDs in comp) number for WR in 2007 was $6.172 million. Let's say that number is $7 million in 2008. I think Belioli believes that they can field a core group of guys, and let Moss take up 6% of the estimated 2008 salary cap.

Assuming Brown retires and Stallworth gets released (because of the roster bonus being insane), that would leave the following 5 WR:

1. Moss
2. Gaffney
3. Welker
4. Washington
5. Johnson

If Stallworth comes to his senses, he takes over the #2, and Gaffney moves to #4. We either carry 6 WR, or part ways with Washington or Johnson.

Where cry-baby Johnson is remains anyone's guess.

As to Samuel, I doubt they were willing to commit $9 million (7.7% of the salary cap) to Samuel, who is only a very good corner. Even here, they're in very good shape with Hobbs and Gay at corner, Harrison (final year) and Wilson at saftey, and quality backups like Merriweather and Sanders. If they could just hang onto Samuel and get another Merriweather-like young player, they'd be in very solid shape.
__________________
The best thing about Troy Brown is not that he was the last ever 8th round draft pic. It's not that he is immortal. It's that when he had the chance to talk to President Bush after the SB 36 win, he asked,

"So when are we going to get Social Security reform?"

That, my friends, is the balls.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
TaxPlaya is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 10:19 PM   #9
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,210
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

You mean Jackson?
sieglo is offline  
Old 09-09-2007, 10:26 PM   #10
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,350
Default Re: The Franchise Tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by alamo View Post
To trade him.

I don't think that was their plan at all when they gave the concession to Samuel, but that's done and now they will possibly look at Moss as Plan B if he has a great season and wants to get paid like the best WR in the league..
That would be breaking the spirt, though not the letter of the law of the CBA - not that it's not been done before.

But after attracting Moss for a one year low pay contract recognizing his desire to be a team player and outplay his salary to win a Super Bowl and boost his long term earning power - then to have the team screw him by slapping the Tag on him will likely assure that NO player will ever make the same "mistake" Moss did by coming here under similar circumstances again.

i.e. - while they'd get a draft pick for Moss, they'd signficantly hinder their ability to attract players similar to Moss and those in his situation in the future

The Patriots aren't stupid enough to mortgage their long term solvency like that - so I don't see this as a plausible theory.
JoeSixPat is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC