Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2007, 07:15 PM   #1
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: nh
Posts: 174
Default Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Like everyone (here and fin heaven) I was puzzled by the trade which included a 7th, but I may an idea to our FO rationale:

3 or 4 or 5 years from now Welker may be a good WR who we want to extend and retain. If we put a poison pill in , say $10M in yr 6 and 7, the players union may not allow us to renogotiate those phony numbers down to a reasonable value (hopefully $10M isn't the norm by then). We'd have to cut him. By trading we buy an insurance policy for the premium of a 7th rd pick.

This is my conjecture. Apologies to anyone who may have previously posted the same idea.
braveht is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-05-2007, 07:18 PM   #2
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Quote:
Originally Posted by braveht View Post
Like everyone (here and fin heaven) I was puzzled by the trade which included a 7th, but I may an idea to our FO rationale:

3 or 4 or 5 years from now Welker may be a good WR who we want to extend and retain. If we put a poison pill in , say $10M in yr 6 and 7, the players union may not allow us to renogotiate those phony numbers down to a reasonable value (hopefully $10M isn't the norm by then). We'd have to cut him. By trading we buy an insurance policy for the premium of a 7th rd pick.

This is my conjecture. Apologies to anyone who may have previously posted the same idea.
I believe money was a factor, but if you minus the poison pill I would guess the contracts probably compared equally.

The MAIN reason I think they wanted it settled is because they want to move onto the next free agent acquisition.
__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers
MrBigglesWorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:18 PM   #3
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,095
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

This isn't baseball where contracts are guarenteed and the union won't approve deals that involve the player's pay being reduced. The players association in the NFL is powerless to stop the team and the player from renogiating. It happens all the time.
dhamz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:29 PM   #4
PatsFans.com Veteran
 
AndyJohnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18,624
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Wouldn't a logical answer be that Miami threatened to match, so we gave them a 7th to ensure they wouldn't?
AndyJohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 07:33 PM   #5
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
Wouldn't a logical answer be that Miami threatened to match, so we gave them a 7th to ensure they wouldn't?
we'll never know unless we knew the pats were going to use the poison pill. it sounded like NE never did an offer sheet.
__________________
"There are two categories of superbowl participants that nobody remembers:

The team that lost the game and the team that only won one." Dwight White- Steelers
MrBigglesWorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:04 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,196
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Quote:
Originally Posted by braveht View Post
Like everyone (here and fin heaven) I was puzzled by the trade which included a 7th, but I may an idea to our FO rationale:

3 or 4 or 5 years from now Welker may be a good WR who we want to extend and retain. If we put a poison pill in , say $10M in yr 6 and 7, the players union may not allow us to renogotiate those phony numbers down to a reasonable value (hopefully $10M isn't the norm by then). We'd have to cut him. By trading we buy an insurance policy for the premium of a 7th rd pick.

This is my conjecture. Apologies to anyone who may have previously posted the same idea.
Good point, given that owners were trying to abolish the poison pill after last offseason, I would not be surprised for it to be eventually done. I can totally picture Polian trying to push for such action with the intent of screwing the Pats, forcing them to pay off a couple of $10 million years.
stinkypete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:18 PM   #7
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,406
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
Wouldn't a logical answer be that Miami threatened to match, so we gave them a 7th to ensure they wouldn't?
in the case of a true poison pill, they could not match...
take whatever deal welker just signed, add $100M for one more year... then guarantee it all if he plays 5 games in miami in a year.
__________________
"If you didn't know better, you'd think the Jets sent Bill Belichick north
to destroy the Patriots from within. (When) they could have had
impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson or the second-best tackle in
the draft in Kenyatta Walker, they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard
Seymour, (who is) too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end." - Xerox Borges, April 2001
PatsWorldChamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:25 PM   #8
Rookie
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

The 7th we gave up is pretty darn close to worthless anyway. There's only a few picks after that one, probably followed by some supplemental picks. Chances are pretty good that anyone we take there we could still sign as an undrafted free agent anyway.

This allows us to resolve things quickly so our cap situation and roster aren't in limbo for a week. More importantly it allows the team to avoid using the poison pill that the league office has already spoken out against. It keeps the Krafts in good graces in the league office.
redsoxfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:35 PM   #9
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 212
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJohnson View Post
Wouldn't a logical answer be that Miami threatened to match, so we gave them a 7th to ensure they wouldn't?
Not much of a threat if there was going to be a so-called poison pill. Listen, Bob Kraft is a leader in this league and it's obvious that he cares about its well-being. There is no reason to go through the drama and negativity of using the poison pill if you don't have to. They threw in a nothing pick to let the Dolphins save face and saved a lot of acrimony and negative publicity.

I see a lot of morons on other boards talking about Colston as a reason the Pats were dumb to do this. For every Marques Colston there are a thousand guys who never get a sniff. Anybody the Pats want at 219 will be there as a udfa.
__________________
I love the smell of Kool-Aid in the morning, that fruit-punch smell. It smells like... victory!
Return of the Nizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:41 PM   #10
In the Starting Line-up
 
borg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,007
Default Re: Rationale for trade vs. RFA to get Welker

Maybe the trade allowed the Pats to factor in the $1.3 mill salary he would have received in 2007 verses starting with a new contract beginning on day 1 with the Pats. Basically, the sign and trade makes Welker honor the numbers that Miami would have paid him for this year, giving the Pats $2+mill of leverage in the negotiation.
__________________
"In the end, Belichick juiced Moss like an orange, and once all the good pulp was squeezed, he tossed Moss aside. "


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
borg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC