The San Diego "sack theory" explained - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2007, 02:39 PM   #1
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In your empty skull
Posts: 189
Default The San Diego "sack theory" explained

The san diego defense recorded and impressive 61 sacks this season. This has been repeatedly thrown in our faces so lets break it down




23% vs. Oakland ( 2 games) and the 31st passing offense: 14

19% vs. Kansas City ( 2 games) and the 22d ranked passing offense : 11

9% vs. Seattle and the 20th ranked passing offense :6

7% vs. Pittsburgh and the 9th ranked passing offense: 5

7% vs. San Francisco and the 29th ranked passing offense : 5

7% vs. Cleveland and the 23d ranked passing offense : 5

6% vs. Denver ( 2 games) and the 25th rated passing offense : 4

5% vs. St Louis and the 4th ranked passing offense : 3

5% vs. Buffalo and the 28th ranked passing offense : 3

3% vs. Baltimore and the 11th ranked passing offense : 2

3% vs. Cincinnatti and the 6th ranked passing offense : 2

2% vs. Arizona and the 10th ranked passing offense : 1

0% vs. Tennessee and the 30th ranked offense: 0 sacks: 0


The Dude is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-08-2007, 02:48 PM   #2
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

I have no idea what the point is but it's amazing they averaged 7 sacks against the Raiders.

FWIW here's where those teams rank in sacks allowed :

Oakland : 32
KC : 22
Seattle : 20
Pittsburgh : 9
SF : 29
Cleveland : 23
Denver : 25
St. Louis : 4
Buffalo : 28
Baltimore : 11
Cincy : 6
Arizona : 10
Tenessee : 30
BelichickFan is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:49 PM   #3
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In your empty skull
Posts: 189
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Quote:
Originally Posted by SdChargeHer View Post
wow 21 sacks against some of the best olines in the NFL not bad. THose being KC Seattle and Denver. Sure is alot of games in there to be having 4 n 5 sacks wow.


Do you comprehend?

21 sacks versus the 22d, 25th, and 20th ranked offenses in regards to passing.

one better 45 against the 31st, 25th, 22d, and 20th



There are only 32 teams in the league you know
The Dude is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:50 PM   #4
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In your empty skull
Posts: 189
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
I have no idea what the point is but it's amazing they averaged 7 sacks against the Raiders.

FWIW here's where those teams rank in sacks allowed :

Oakland : 32
KC : 22
Seattle : 20
Pittsburgh : 9
SF : 29
Cleveland : 23
Denver : 25
St. Louis : 4
Buffalo : 28
Baltimore : 11
Cincy : 6
Arizona : 10
Tenessee : 30
you just made the point. San Diego piled up massive amount sof sacks against weak o-lines
The Dude is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:51 PM   #5
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 99
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
The san diego defense recorded and impressive 61 sacks this season. This has been repeatedly thrown in our faces so lets break it down




23% vs. Oakland ( 2 games) and the 31st passing offense: 14

19% vs. Kansas City ( 2 games) and the 22d ranked passing offense : 11

9% vs. Seattle and the 20th ranked passing offense :6

7% vs. Pittsburgh and the 9th ranked passing offense: 5

7% vs. San Francisco and the 29th ranked passing offense : 5

7% vs. Cleveland and the 23d ranked passing offense : 5

6% vs. Denver ( 2 games) and the 25th rated passing offense : 4

5% vs. St Louis and the 4th ranked passing offense : 3

5% vs. Buffalo and the 28th ranked passing offense : 3

3% vs. Baltimore and the 11th ranked passing offense : 2

3% vs. Cincinnatti and the 6th ranked passing offense : 2

2% vs. Arizona and the 10th ranked passing offense : 1

0% vs. Tennessee and the 30th ranked offense: 0 sacks: 0



WTF does this have to do with anything? Yeah, we didn't record a sack versus the Titans. And we only beat them 40-7. Boo hoo. The Titans also didn't record a first down in that game until midway through the third quarter.

61 sacks while our best pass rusher missed 25% of the season, our 2nd best pass rusher missed 19% of the season and our best DL pass rusher missed 37% of the season. Too bad for you all those guys are back healthy now. Had we been a bit healthier, we probably would have broken the '85 Bears record for most sacks in a season.
boltssbbound is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:51 PM   #6
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

That averages the 19th best (13th worst) OL faced.

Look, the Chargers will get their sacks. Fine, whatever. We're going to punt some drives. What matters is that it's not more than about 3 times and that Brady holds onto the ball. No fumbles. No INTs while throwing to get rid of the ball. Take the sack, punt, try again.
BelichickFan is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:52 PM   #7
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 99
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
I have no idea what the point is but it's amazing they averaged 7 sacks against the Raiders.

FWIW here's where those teams rank in sacks allowed :

Oakland : 32
KC : 22
Seattle : 20
Pittsburgh : 9
SF : 29
Cleveland : 23
Denver : 25
St. Louis : 4
Buffalo : 28
Baltimore : 11
Cincy : 6
Arizona : 10
Tenessee : 30
You know, the Bolts contributed to those rankings.
boltssbbound is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:53 PM   #8
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In your empty skull
Posts: 189
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Quote:
Originally Posted by boltssbbound View Post
WTF does this have to do with anything? Yeah, we didn't record a sack versus the Titans. And we only beat them 40-7. Boo hoo. The Titans also didn't record a first down in that game until midway through the third quarter.

61 sacks while our best pass rusher missed 25% of the season, our 2nd best pass rusher missed 19% of the season and our best DL pass rusher missed 37% of the season. Too bad for you all those guys are back healthy now. Had we been a bit healthier, we probably would have broken the '85 Bears record for most sacks in a season.
The Bears played much tougher teams than your girls in sand diego did
The Dude is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:55 PM   #9
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Belichick says Sacks are overrated and He's right as rain. Add up the number of fumbles, INTs, 3rd and didn't make its, and 4th and didn't make its, and you have a much more reliable measure of a Defense. All are turnovers . so for that matter is th epunt but that is included in the 3rd and didn't make it figures.

Sacks, pressured incompletions, PDs and INTs when totaled are a much better measure of a pass defense, than an outlandish sack total. Sacks may stop a drive. Fumble INTs definitely do. PDs of the tip variety have a much higher probability of generating an INT and turnover, than a sack.

Sixty one sacks pumped up by 14 against the hapless Raiders alone, doesn't mean as much. Beside the Pats have 47 sacks themselves and play a read-and-react before pass rushing scheme. That statistic is probably just as, if not more spectacular, if you consider it.
AzPatsFan is online now  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:56 PM   #10
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,556
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: The San Diego "sack theory" explained

Quote:
Originally Posted by boltssbbound View Post
You know, the Bolts contributed to those rankings.
Duh.

But they only contributed 1 out of 16 games. By the way they really rank tied for 20/21 in opponents sacks faced because I forgot to factor in their AFCW opponents twice.

Look, we know the Charger pass rush is good. Allright ? But even with the numbers from SD subtracted they haven't exactly faced the top OL in the league most weeks.
BelichickFan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC