Calling all flip-floppers - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-19-2006, 06:23 PM   #11
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,803
Default Re: Calling all flip-floppers

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBigglesWorth
I still think their offense lacked continuity. In the first half the majority of the passes went to the te's and rb's. I like their new wrinkle of two rb's in the back field, but they ran the same play with caldwell in the left slot too many times. They are still pretty predictable. I liked the caldwell long bomb, I just don't get why they don't send chad jackson on this with his speed.

I liked the toss runs to maroney and the short passes that have the potential to turn into runs(his td run as a prime example).

Still no screens from my recollection...why?

And maroney got more carries than average due to dillon's temporary absence.

The first half was impressive, the second half was against rodgers.

They better resolve the secondary issue in the offseason and draft a top cd or two. It's ridiculous brown is playing cb.
There was absolutely no pass rush or blitzing on Brady, why would you throw a screen pass. The offense was close to flawless today.
__________________
Great teams aren't always great. They are just great when they have to be. - NFL Films Narrator


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Willie55 is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-19-2006, 07:43 PM   #12
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 
JoeSixPat's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,353
Default Re: Calling all flip-floppers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie55
Those of you who said Brady should be benched, calling for more Maroney, questioning the FO, and all the other posts that were made this week, stand up and take a bow.

I know it was the now 4-6 and Packers, but being able to dominate like that anytime in the NFL , especially against a team that had won three straight, playing on the frozen tundra of the hallowed ground of Lambeau Field, was pretty impressive.

Just remember a search can be done to find what you wrote last week.
Do the search and I think all you'll see from me is criticisms of the playcalling and a calling out of the receivers to see if they can add consistency to their repetoire.

Those questions both need to be answered over the remainder of the season as the entire offense has been inconsistent all season - though I have a feeling if things still aren't going well in week 16 we'll have plenty of people still calling for us to give Brady and his receivers "more time" to get to know each other
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
JoeSixPat is offline  
Old 11-19-2006, 10:19 PM   #13
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Mass
Posts: 8,342
Default Re: Calling all flip-floppers

I don't think they had any screens against the jets. A screen today would have been another opportunity to get maroney open in space to make a play.

Although they scored 35 points I thought the pats benefited from two plays early on. The first was the no call on hobbs with jennings for PI. The second was the graham call that set up great field position. Reverse those two calls and the storyline of this game could be dramatically different.
MrBigglesWorth is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC