ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
i dont understand, which other team has more depth ? there are only 53 people allowed on the roster ...
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Felger just needs to find something to complain about sometimes.
How many teams have backups as good as Jarvis Green? Very few. The Pats thrive on their depth.
Also, one important note is that we would have even more depth if it weren't for the injuries to Gardner, Jones & Mitchell. To say we went out and did nothing this offseason is stupid - we signed 3 guys who could provide versatility, depth and great special teams. They all just happened to get season ending injuries, which sucks, but Felger can't blame that on BB or Pioli.
Felger reminds me of a guy who has never played anything but Pong. He makes declarative statements about the overall state of the Pats but has no football insight at all. His thing with 3 reasons why the Pats/will/won't win thing is about as dumb as it gets and when he tries to analyze the game, I laugh at how he waits for others to fill in the broad strokes.
Just another media member that decided that marketing to the mass-ingnorant is better than providing insight and analysis.
Not much of a surprise, really. Although it is amusing how much Felger is like a dog with bone. He just keeps chomping on certain issues and any time some tries to free the story from his grip, he growls menacingly so he doesn't have to let go.
It's weird, we have good depth. Chad Scott has looked good for Hobbs. Hawkins has looked good for Wilson. Jarvis can stand in for Seymour. We have two quality RB. Dave Thomas looks like a capable #3 TE. Even the WR, we may be lacking at #1 and #2 but the #4 and #5 are better than last year. When healthy, Kaczur will have trouble beating out O'Callaghan.
I can't keep up with his rants. He had three or four just for Corey Dillon alone. FIrst he yammered aobut how Corey would be a locker room cancer and how he'd blow up when his carries were reduced. Then it was how he would blow up when Maroney got carries and how he would pout and not talk to Maroney, then he was all washed up.
Between that and "we lost Banch and Givens and other Pats WRs will never amount to anything and then first we can't rely on TEs and then why aren't we using the TEs more and Brady's body language was bad at the Denver game and we need to sign a big name DB and why do they always sign big names like Starks who are washed up and our LBs are too old oops wait a minute they are now too young and on and on and on ....
You'd need a program to keep up with his rants. Why bother? He is obviously saying anything controversial that he can to "improve" his show ratings. He even turned on Borges once.
Um...am I the only one here who didn't think he was ranting? Am I the only one who read that article, expecting it to be negative and found that, for the most part, he was saying he'd been wrong so far and thought the depth was improved? I can't stand Felger either, but I don't think this thread is a fair or accurate of that column.
Um...am I the only one here who didn't think he was ranting? Am I the only one who read that article, expecting it to be negative and found that, for the most part, he was saying he'd been wrong so far and thought the depth was improved? I can't stand Felger either, but I don't think this thread is a fair or accurate of that column.
Thoughts?
You could be right. I didn't read the article in question. I was talking obout his rants in general, but also I figure I know enough of his rants I can fill in the blanks without actually having to read his words. If he was saying that we have more depth in the DL than most any other team in the NFL then good for him.
Last edited by brady2brown; 10-30-2006 at 10:24 AM..
Um...am I the only one here who didn't think he was ranting? Am I the only one who read that article, expecting it to be negative and found that, for the most part, he was saying he'd been wrong so far and thought the depth was improved? I can't stand Felger either, but I don't think this thread is a fair or accurate of that column.
Thoughts?
I'm with you completely in your reading of the column. He was
A. Admitting his error.
B. Writing an easy column be regurgitating issues he'd raised before.
As somebody who's been known to sweat at great length over a monthly column, I have a lot of sympathy for B.
As for the issue of actual depth -- the Patriots are about two high-quality LBs from having equivalent depth to what they had in their depth glory years, when Felger and everybody else rightly credits them for having the greatest pro footballd depth accomplishments of all time.
felger continues his depth rant
Linear Mode
